BatmanTurian wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
HellishFiend wrote...
fr33stylez wrote...
The problem I'll always have with the IT is the weakest part of the theory involves WHEN Shepard tactually became indoctrinated. I'm in the belief that there's nothing really in the game to suggest he's ever in close proximity with a Reaper long enough to become indoctrinated. Even if he were, he wouldn't be the only one indoctrinated.
There is a lot of speculation and information on this topic. One of the most prevalent theories is that Shepard's indoctrionation started during his exposure to Object Rho in Arrival. This is supported by the fact that the Arrival DLC was made in the same time frame that Bioware was putting together Mass Effect 3. If they felt they needed a more tangible story element to suggest that Shepard was about to undergo some form of indoctrination attempt, they sure managed to work a strong one into Arrival.
If a player didn't do the Arrival DLC, then all of the time spent in the Collector Base and the time spent on the derelict reaper, all of the times spent around Harbinger-possessed Collectors, and all of the times Shepard interacted with Sovereign (all the way back to Eden Prime) counts as a gentle 3-year indoctrination similar to what Seren experienced before he caved to Synthesis.
But morever, it doesn't make as much sense as Rho, and to be honest, that jives pretty well with their track record of explaining certain things for n00bs
Oh, I agree. It's just that n00bs may not have played Arrival so you have to satisfy those inevitable nitpickers who will say " Well, my shepard didn't do Arrival. So my Shepard can't be in the process of being indoctrinated" *sigh*
First I'd like to say I find the Indoctrination Theory very intriguing. I also think pople who have developed the IT have spent more time than BW bother to with their endings. Bottom line, my opinion is that the IT tries its best to make sense of a garbled and poor communicated ending.
My understanding of Indoctrinaion throughout the trilogy is that there is evidence of a progression in the individual being indoctrinated. It is true we must reject Object Rho from Arrival (BW's fault), beause this 'indoctrination' occurs in ME3 even if Shepard never came into contact with Object Rho. I also haven't seen any characters in ME that were indoctrinated due to 'acute' exposure to Reaper/Reaper artifacts. Shepard talking to the VI in Vimire, or fighting Collectors wouldn't qualify in my opinon as constant exposure, as I don't even see how these two things can lead to indoctrination.
1) If Shepard is the only member of his crew that was expericing indoctrination, one would expect there would be clues in the things Shepard says in the course of the game which would suggest Shepard having
1a) If the argument is we couldn't see these subtle changes in Shepard's beliefs because we are in his perspective (technically that's not true, it's third-person) one could still wonder why none of the dozen people on your ship that familiar with indoctrination since ME1 didn'tnotice anything.
2) If fighting Collectors, being in a Collector base, talking to Soverign on Vimire, going on the Derelict Reaper is enough to cause Indoctrination, there is no reason why others on your team (Tali, Garrus, etc.) wouldn't have suffered the same fate.
So my problem lies that there is no evidence of the progression of indoctrination in Shepard's thoughts and beliefs in the trilogy preceding the ending. If anything, they get stronger during the course of the series.
Modifié par fr33stylez, 01 mai 2012 - 02:53 .