SubAstris wrote...
It is frankly on par with the space magic which caused Shepard to be resurrected
Not even remotely true. Given that the Reapers can pretty much mind control every known organic species, it's fair to say that their billion years of existence have taught them a few things about the way brains work. Remember that scene where the scientist says that "for whatever good it's worth" Shepard's helmet kept his brain in tact? That's all they need. As long as Cerberus, who we know has always had a stiffy for Reaper tech, can save his memories and such from that in-tact brain then it's doable. Everything else is unimportant. It can be cloned or made with tissue from poor saps that Miranda tricked into a date and then murdered (anyone else got an explanation for her shadow broker dossier?). The brain is all that's truly important. They had the brain in-tact and they study the tech of a species that knows everything there is to know about brains.
I can't seem to come up with anything to explain a galaxywide reworking of the most basic levels of life, even leaving everyone unharmed but with printed circuitry on their skin. Seriously, printed circuitry? It's like they're trying to tell us how retardedly impossible that ending is.
Uncle Jo wrote...
I'll just add something about the "age" of Harby... It's assumed in the codex that Harbinger is the oldest and the largest Reaper. Well the Reapers maybe don't have the same value scale about this point as the organics do...
Nice to see somebody else thinks it has some merit hehe. But yeah, there's literally no way they could know Harbinger is the oldest one. Hell, they're (they being whoever wrote the codex) not even positive which one he is. "Alliance intelligence has tentatively identified Harbinger as one of the Reapers leading the attack on Earth." Tentatively identified?
I mean yeah, the codex doesn't exactly support this theory but it's hardly a dealbreaker. It's about the same as "Shepard can't be indoctrinated because the Prothean VI would've caught it." And I still find it very suspicious that EDI doesn't give her reasoning on the assumption that the Prothean Reaper failed. Not that it would exclude the possibility that it was attempted elsewhere anyway. It's a shame that the subject of Harbinger never comes up around Javik. It'd be interesting to see what he says.
And really, the Protheans have always seemed to figure a lot more into the grand scheme of things than we expect. ME1 was all about taking advantage of the opportunity they left us by sabotaging the Keepers. ME2 was the Collectors of course. And now we've got these "phoenix" rumors for 3...
bigstig wrote...
I take things like this with a grain of salt, file names aren't necessarily proof of anything, it could be be signficant or it could just as easily be a a place holder, mean somthing entirely different or refer to internal naming
Sorry to say, those same plants appear in places like Sanctuary and parts of the Citadel (the real one). My assumption on their naming is that they were named such because they were made for the dreams and the dreams were in the early part of production. When areas were made later on, they reused the same plant models.
That's up for debate, we know next to nothing about the reapers, a codex entry states that Harbringer is the oldest but doesn't say how they established this
It says "The Reaper called Harbinger is believed to be the oldest and largest in the Reaper armada." "Believed" is the key word.
Rosewind wrote...
Harbringer isn't prothein based, I dont think any of them are thats why they where turned into the collectors. Isn't Harvy meant to be one of the oldest reapers?
There's no given reason for the "failed" Prothean Reaper. But it's definitely not something as simple as DNA type. They wouldn't have even attempted it if the Protheans were an incompatible DNA type. I have no earthly idea where you got anything about Harbinger being protean based or not.