SS2Dante wrote...
TheConstantOne wrote...
Salient Archer wrote...
Updated my EMS system again, added more theories on Synthesis:
*snip*
2800 - 3999
Shepard by this stage has proven how valuable he really is as an asset to the Reapers, not only this but by this stage the Reapers realize how powerful Shepard’s will is becoming and hence they fear he might break free of the indoctrination process.
Fearful of loosing their best potential asset, the Reapers pull out their big guns and present another tempting choice: The synthesis of Organics and Synthetics. This choice is not only the moral high-ground but also seems incredibly amazing due to implications it has of galactic peace for both Synthetics and Organics for all eternity and essentialy ends the cycle and removes the need of the Reapers. It represents the hope of a permanent end to the cycle of destruction and the dawn of the next evolutionary step for galactic life. To bad it’s a big fat lie.
Pause and think about what Synthesis and final evolution is to the Reapers; well to be honest it's more Reapers. Think about Sovereign’s conversation with Shepard or any of the taunts Harbinger gives you in ME2, both reapers state that "they are our destiny, they are the final evolution". Also take note that during the suicide mission EDI points out that the human reaper was both made from organic and non-organic materials, which would be the very definition of Synthesis from a Reaper's perspective.
This added choice is also the Reapers attempt to get Shepard to see things their way, just as they did with Jack Harper and Saren. Indoctrination isn't about being told what to do or being controlled, it's more subtle than that, it's design is more like inception in that it makes the individual full heartedly believe that the Reapers are to be revered, and that the individual came to this conclusion themselves, this creates the distinction of the control they have of the husks and the conviction of their indoctrinated mouth pieces such as Saren. Indoctrination is to truly believe that whatever thought they've planted in your head is your own.
What about Synthesis being the last additional choice as far as being a game mechanic?, aren’t ‘we’ as players expected to be rewarded for more work and accomplishments? Well, yes we are!, We’ve been conditioned time and time again for this to be the case! So wouldn’t it stand to reason that if BioWare wanted to indoctrinate “us the player” that they would use a game mechanic and typical reward system as their last best chance to throw us off the right path?
Notes: When picking this option Shepard seems to morph into an almost husk like appearance complete with glowing blue eyes which also share the same iris pattern as the Illusive man.
*snip*
If synthesis is anything other than what Star Bieber leads you to believe, it does seem to be an unequivocally bad thing. The biggest question that remains is which will have the worst effect: Shepard succumbing to Reaper indoctrination for synthesis or Shepard giving in for control?
Think synthesis is worse. Control just means you're deluded, Synthesis means you agree with the Reaper aim.
I agree with SS2Dante on that, to me Control is like being missguided, deceived, or even apathetic, where as Synthesis shows total obedience to their cause and very nature.
To be honest, it's a case of which is the better of the two evils, but considering one is the opinion of a raving, xenophobic, indoctrinated, psychopathic man-man and the other is the opinion of a raving, xenophobic, indoctrinated, psychopathic Turian ... well you can see where I'm going with this.
Modifié par Salient Archer, 10 mai 2012 - 12:31 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut










