Ce sujet est fermé
Arian Dynas wrote...
To which I say again, one it's not one person saying it, it's three or four different ones, and I am saying, if you want to do so, and count it as evidence, go and corroborate it.
waldstr18 wrote...
youve called? whats up? anything been proven yet?
HellishFiend wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
To which I say again, one it's not one person saying it, it's three or four different ones, and I am saying, if you want to do so, and count it as evidence, go and corroborate it.
I've no interest in corroborating it, and will continue to disbelieve it unless I see a video...
The game has been out for two months. A video would be posted already if this were true.
HellishFiend wrote...
waldstr18 wrote...
youve called? whats up? anything been proven yet?
The fact that you're standing here proves it! But it also proves that Arian's solution wont work anymore.
liggy002 wrote...
HellishFiend wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
To which I say again, one it's not one person saying it, it's three or four different ones, and I am saying, if you want to do so, and count it as evidence, go and corroborate it.
I've no interest in corroborating it, and will continue to disbelieve it unless I see a video...
The game has been out for two months. A video would be posted already if this were true.
Go play all 3 games and find out for yourself. Don't romance anyone. At least that's what I'm going to do. Think about it though, how many people went through all 3 games without romancing anyone, almost no one. It's an easy way to hide something important from us.
Modifié par liggy002, 11 mai 2012 - 11:49 .
Arian Dynas wrote...
Dissolving him in a soloution. Tempting thought. You tease.
liggy002 wrote...
The anti IT believers are just going call this new evidence with Anderson bad writing... and they say that we are the ones who are in denial
Modifié par liggy002, 11 mai 2012 - 11:54 .
waldstr18 wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
Dissolving him in a soloution. Tempting thought. You tease.
sorry, cant stay. but dont you also have anything better to do than still theorizing about a game from .. when was it released again? long ago...
there is stuff outside. like trees! you like trees. or so i have read in your theory. but mind the sun, its like the harbinger beam, except it gives you cancer instead of indoctrination theories.
Modifié par Arian Dynas, 11 mai 2012 - 11:55 .
1st: That video is crap.Anchor654 wrote...
Anchor654 wrote...
I'm just going to leave this here...
Maybe this is how Shep is indoctrinated. What exactly is in that drive core sphere anyway? We only know what we've been told from Cerberus.
I think it could be a reaper artifact like in Arrival and the one that affected Saren and the Illusive Man in the comics. Perhaps it just took longer because Shep never touches the one on the Normandy. It takes time.
Also, I had just finished watching the 1hr 1/2 documentary on indoctrination theory by the way and am completely sold. (Found here: http://m.youtube.com...h?v=caAqFFhBn2U ) I just see a reaper artifact being inside the Normandy drive core sphere being a way to explain how Shep gets indoctrinated through ME2-3 than just by encounters with reaper tech over time and/or the Eva/Edi robot reaper tech body theory that I've heard.
HellishFiend wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
To which I say again, one it's not one person saying it, it's three or four different ones, and I am saying, if you want to do so, and count it as evidence, go and corroborate it.
I've no interest in corroborating it, and will continue to disbelieve it unless I see a video...
The game has been out for two months. A video would be posted already if this were true.
liggy002 wrote...
You don't know it's not in the game. You can't make that statement until you prove or disprove it. And suppose it was cut? That means that Bioware intended to use it at one point. Think what you want but I bet that it's true.
Arian Dynas wrote...
HellishFiend wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
To which I say again, one it's not one person saying it, it's three or four different ones, and I am saying, if you want to do so, and count it as evidence, go and corroborate it.
I've no interest in corroborating it, and will continue to disbelieve it unless I see a video...
The game has been out for two months. A video would be posted already if this were true.
If that were the case, then we'd also have a video of EDI walking off the Normandy in the Destroy ending.
MegumiAzusa wrote...
1st: That video is crap.Anchor654 wrote...
Anchor654 wrote...
I'm just going to leave this here...
*snip*
*snip*
Maybe this is how Shep is indoctrinated. What exactly is in that drive core sphere anyway? We only know what we've been told from Cerberus.
I think it could be a reaper artifact like in Arrival and the one that affected Saren and the Illusive Man in the comics. Perhaps it just took longer because Shep never touches the one on the Normandy. It takes time.
Also, I had just finished watching the 1hr 1/2 documentary on indoctrination theory by the way and am completely sold. (Found here: http://m.youtube.com...h?v=caAqFFhBn2U ) I just see a reaper artifact being inside the Normandy drive core sphere being a way to explain how Shep gets indoctrinated through ME2-3 than just by encounters with reaper tech over time and/or the Eva/Edi robot reaper tech body theory that I've heard.
2nd: The drive core got a complete overhaul compared to ME2, just look at it in ME2, it looks completely different. If it would be an artifact like you think they would have some husks running around.
In my opinion, none of the leaked script can be taken as any evidence, given microsofts policy regarding certification I find it hard to believe the beta with script embedded was an accidental release, it's not like it was hard to spot that it was a beta, lack of textures, no lip movement,, and the certification process takes weeks, so someone had to be sleeping on the job for weeks not to notice the glaring issues, I'm more convinced than ever that the leak was deliberate, false information.HellishFiend wrote...
liggy002 wrote...
The anti IT believers are just going call this new evidence with Anderson bad writing... and they say that we are the ones who are in denial
Except it's not evidence since its not in the game. I'm still 99% sure IT is correct, but we cant use the cut Anderson lines as evidence. That would be like trying to use the cubemap tree reflections as evidence if the cubemaps werent actually used in the game.
HellishFiend wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
HellishFiend wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
To which I say again, one it's not one person saying it, it's three or four different ones, and I am saying, if you want to do so, and count it as evidence, go and corroborate it.
I've no interest in corroborating it, and will continue to disbelieve it unless I see a video...
The game has been out for two months. A video would be posted already if this were true.
If that were the case, then we'd also have a video of EDI walking off the Normandy in the Destroy ending.
What's your point? I never cited "EDI walking off the Normandy in the Destroy ending" as evidence, nor did it come up in this discussion, so I'm not sure what that has to do with the point I'm trying to make.
Arian Dynas wrote...
Also, let's see, for my next script re-write... things I gotta do... work in the Coates is a turncoat subplot, the "crucible as a Mass Accelerator cannon" theory, and potentially the "Crucible doesn't work" theory, and some places for gameplay possibly, perhaps using a laser to pain Harbinger while badly wounded? Hmm, though that would remove the dramatic exit I have planned for Harby... hmmmm... decisions decisions, what do you guys think? After all, I only write these for your collective enjoyment.
DJBare wrote...
In my opinion, none of the leaked script can be taken as any evidence, given microsofts policy regarding certification I find it hard to believe the beta with script embedded was an accidental release, it's not like it was hard to spot that it was a beta, lack of textures, no lip movement,, and the certification process takes weeks, so someone had to be sleeping on the job for weeks not to notice the glaring issues, I'm more convinced than ever that the leak was deliberate, false information.HellishFiend wrote...
liggy002 wrote...
The anti IT believers are just going call this new evidence with Anderson bad writing... and they say that we are the ones who are in denial
Except it's not evidence since its not in the game. I'm still 99% sure IT is correct, but we cant use the cut Anderson lines as evidence. That would be like trying to use the cubemap tree reflections as evidence if the cubemaps werent actually used in the game.
It can also be viewed as evidence for IT, "deception"HellishFiend wrote...
DJBare wrote...
In my opinion, none of the leaked script can be taken as any evidence, given microsofts policy regarding certification I find it hard to believe the beta with script embedded was an accidental release, it's not like it was hard to spot that it was a beta, lack of textures, no lip movement,, and the certification process takes weeks, so someone had to be sleeping on the job for weeks not to notice the glaring issues, I'm more convinced than ever that the leak was deliberate, false information.HellishFiend wrote...
liggy002 wrote...
The anti IT believers are just going call this new evidence with Anderson bad writing... and they say that we are the ones who are in denial
Except it's not evidence since its not in the game. I'm still 99% sure IT is correct, but we cant use the cut Anderson lines as evidence. That would be like trying to use the cubemap tree reflections as evidence if the cubemaps werent actually used in the game.
I agree. I've never considered anything from the leaked script to be evidence for IT.
DJBare wrote...
It can also be viewed as evidence for IT, "deception"HellishFiend wrote...
I agree. I've never considered anything from the leaked script to be evidence for IT.
There are at least 4 blatant errors in the first 20 minutes, that can even be disproven with the footage at these points, so no need to call yourself a nerd because of thatArian Dynas wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
1st: That video is crap.
First off, yeah saw said documentary, and I actually have a number of errors he made that I feel he needs to fix. Yes I am a nerd with an absurdly good memory.
Maybe you are already completely indoctrinated and your reality is completely skewed and in destroy you actually destroy the Normandy?pirate1802 wrote...
The Normandy drive core looks suspiciously like the destroy tube
Retour en haut
