Davies, entertaining though your indignation is, it was my intention to insult your intelligence. The lead writer's end-game notes came out and you still can't let go of your disproven theory!
And YES, I compared you to Birthers and Truthers. Is it an apt comparison in terms of scope or context? No. In terms of rabid denial of any contradictory evidence, desperate clinging to theories even as they dissolve, and inability to acknowledge any circumstance in which you might be wrong? YES. A THOUSAND TIMES YES.
That's actually why I said don't insult it.
Where does it disprove it? Again and again you mindless drones say the same thing but fail EVERY single time to follow it up. Surely it's not that hard to provide it if the evidence is so abundant?
Does it refute it because it says they wanted it open to interpretation?
Who is to say that therefore they are not planning DLC in relation to the ending?
Does it refute it because he said it is LIKELY that there will be no end game DLC?
Indoc theory takes place during + likely does not = definitely.
You are basing your entire argument of incomplete data that was subject to change during production. NOTHING, in those notes that were shown disproves nor proves indoc theory. Back up your claims for crying out loud.
Come on, just one single credible answer.
Again, proving that you cannot provide any evidence. What does it contradict? Where has the OP said that it is the answer and you must believe? It's a theory. By definition it is not fact. I certainly have not asserted this. You are making a massive assumption and taking a gigantic leap of logic. Why don't you get back on your motorcycle of hyperbole, and come back when you are willing to talk rationally.
You actually remind me of a truther, cannot provide evidence for claims and asserts that they are right and we are simply blind.
Modifié par Davies993, 15 mars 2012 - 11:42 .