Was the ending a hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory
#15176
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:36
If indeed this theory is correct, which I wholeheartedly hope it is, what are they waiting for to reveal it to us?
Because if the ending is really going to be some kind of DLC, I doubt they're still developing/designing it.
#15177
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:39
#15178
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:39
Descedent wrote...
VanDex wrote...
Ona Demonie wrote...
Some times I feel like this thread is an American English class where Mass Effect 3 was our assigned book we all had to read and the teacher (BioWare) told us to discuss the "symbolism and why the events happened" in the book. Some say "Because the writer wanted to have the character do that" while others are taking points from the book and supporting why its more than "just cause".
(English major here).
you poor soul
Hahahaha! I'm an Englsih Major too and I feel the exact same way!
#15179
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:40
#15180
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:41
Ms_Alison_Gunn wrote...
Descedent wrote...
VanDex wrote...
Ona Demonie wrote...
Some times I feel like this thread is an American English class where Mass Effect 3 was our assigned book we all had to read and the teacher (BioWare) told us to discuss the "symbolism and why the events happened" in the book. Some say "Because the writer wanted to have the character do that" while others are taking points from the book and supporting why its more than "just cause".
(English major here).
you poor soul
Hahahaha! I'm an Englsih Major too and I feel the exact same way!
That reminds me of (native) German class back in the last years of school, where all those books where so "great" because they didn't provide answers but forced the reader to reflect. I hated them...
"Faust" was the only one I enjoyed because it actually had an ending^^
#15181
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:43
Illusive Man can shoot himself.....how does that apply to this?
#15182
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:44
Mr. Mistake wrote...
So, I have a question.
If indeed this theory is correct, which I wholeheartedly hope it is, what are they waiting for to reveal it to us?
Because if the ending is really going to be some kind of DLC, I doubt they're still developing/designing it.
Asia just got ME3 yesterday, so they're going to give everyone time to play through it so they don't spoil anything. They have a panel at PAX East in three weeks, and Shepard's birthday is April 11, so if/when they say anything my guess is it would be somewhere around there.
#15183
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:45
TheRaggyGandalf wrote...
Ms_Alison_Gunn wrote...
Descedent wrote...
VanDex wrote...
Ona Demonie wrote...
Some times I feel like this thread is an American English class where Mass Effect 3 was our assigned book we all had to read and the teacher (BioWare) told us to discuss the "symbolism and why the events happened" in the book. Some say "Because the writer wanted to have the character do that" while others are taking points from the book and supporting why its more than "just cause".
(English major here).
you poor soul
Hahahaha! I'm an Englsih Major too and I feel the exact same way!
That reminds me of (native) German class back in the last years of school, where all those books where so "great" because they didn't provide answers but forced the reader to reflect. I hated them...
"Faust" was the only one I enjoyed because it actually had an ending^^
Yeah I hate those types of books so much and then to see my favorite game seires go that route just broke my heart. I found it very frustrating. But I am hoping this theory holds up to be true because right now it is the only thing that is making ME3 playabe again.
#15184
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:45
We read "The Crucible" (no pun intended
#15185
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:46
It is not unlike what happend to Saren. Shepard's mind is replaying the same scenario.kylecouch wrote...
I find a slight problem with
Illusive Man can shoot himself.....how does that apply to this?
#15186
Guest_simfamUP_*
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:46
Guest_simfamUP_*
kylecouch wrote...
I find a slight problem with
Illusive Man can shoot himself.....how does that apply to this?
It's mostly all symbolic, so think of the message behind these things.
I doubt BioWare are THAT good though :-/ who knows... I am starting to doubt this theory since it tends to read into things I don't think even BioWare would think of. If Chris Avellon was in the project then sure, but he isn't...
#15187
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:50
See, the thing is (and I'm sure somebody's already mentioned that in the thread) that a game is a much more personal and interactive experience compared to books, films and tv series, and that's where all the hate at the endings comes from.
It's not about "Oh, I don't like where you went with the ending thing, Bioware!", but rather "I don't like that i hardly decide anything in the end, even though i was promised otherwise".
As for books and films, some of the finest ones I've seen/read are actually the ones with ambiguity everywhere, the ones that encourage you to make your own conclusions (Nolan's Memento immediately comes to mind).
Modifié par VanDex, 16 mars 2012 - 02:51 .
#15188
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:50
simfamSP wrote...
kylecouch wrote...
I find a slight problem with
Illusive Man can shoot himself.....how does that apply to this?
It's mostly all symbolic, so think of the message behind these things.
I doubt BioWare are THAT good though :-/ who knows... I am starting to doubt this theory since it tends to read into things I don't think even BioWare would think of. If Chris Avellon was in the project then sure, but he isn't...
I agree, with the Final Hours stuff I'm starting to think it's more of a big mistake, but, having 2 main antagonists die exactly the same way would just be terrible storytelling.
#15189
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:52
VanDex wrote...
@TheRaggyGandalf
See, the thing is (and I'm sure somebody's already mentioned that in the thread) that a game is a much more personal and interactive experience compared to books, films and tv series, and that's where all the hate at the endings comes from. It's not about "Oh, I don't like where you went with the ending thing, Bioware!", but rather "I don't like that i hardly decide anything in the end, even though i was promised otherwise". As for books and films, some of the finest ones I've seen/read are actually the ones with ambiguity everywhere, the ones that encourage you to make your own conclusions (Nolan's Memento immediately comes to mind).
I never said I liked the ending for mass effect I hate it as much as those books.
Probably even more since as you said you crafted parts of the story and the complete loss of control (
Modifié par TheRaggyGandalf, 16 mars 2012 - 02:52 .
#15190
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:52
simfamSP wrote...
kylecouch wrote...
I find a slight problem with
Illusive Man can shoot himself.....how does that apply to this?
It's mostly all symbolic, so think of the message behind these things.
I doubt BioWare are THAT good though :-/ who knows... I am starting to doubt this theory since it tends to read into things I don't think even BioWare would think of. If Chris Avellon was in the project then sure, but he isn't...
See thats the only reason I don't believe this....I don't think Bioware is anywhere near that talented...I reeeaallly don't. DA2 proved that to me personally, sure their different teams and all...but still.
#15191
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:56
#15192
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:57

Caution

Danger

Just sayin...
#15193
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:58
#15194
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:58
kylecouch wrote...
simfamSP wrote...
kylecouch wrote...
I find a slight problem with
Illusive Man can shoot himself.....how does that apply to this?
It's mostly all symbolic, so think of the message behind these things.
I doubt BioWare are THAT good though :-/ who knows... I am starting to doubt this theory since it tends to read into things I don't think even BioWare would think of. If Chris Avellon was in the project then sure, but he isn't...
See thats the only reason I don't believe this....I don't think Bioware is anywhere near that talented...I reeeaallly don't. DA2 proved that to me personally, sure their different teams and all...but still.
DA2 was also one of the buggiest RPGs I've ever played, and DA2's graphics don't even come close to ME2 or ME3's. (I still enjoyed DA2, but just saying.) Same company, different artists, different writers, different QA, different amount of people working on it, etc.
Modifié par savionen, 16 mars 2012 - 02:59 .
#15195
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:58
MJF JD wrote...
lol nice pics
Sign Language?
edit: What I mean is if we are interpreting anything. One could try to see if the kid is doing official sign language
Modifié par TheRaggyGandalf, 16 mars 2012 - 03:00 .
#15196
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 02:59
TheRaggyGandalf wrote...
MJF JD wrote...
lol nice pics
Sign Language?
ba dum tish?
#15197
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 03:00
kylecouch wrote...
simfamSP wrote...
kylecouch wrote...
I find a slight problem with
Illusive Man can shoot himself.....how does that apply to this?
It's mostly all symbolic, so think of the message behind these things.
I doubt BioWare are THAT good though :-/ who knows... I am starting to doubt this theory since it tends to read into things I don't think even BioWare would think of. If Chris Avellon was in the project then sure, but he isn't...
See thats the only reason I don't believe this....I don't think Bioware is anywhere near that talented...I reeeaallly don't. DA2 proved that to me personally, sure their different teams and all...but still.
There's a million more reasons not to believe it. The interviews in the app. The leaked script that matches the end exactly and makes no mention of indoctrination. The fact that game it self tells you you one no matter the ending. The fact the epilogue makes it clear the events are real and fires after every ending. The tweets last night where she said again this is the end of Shep's story and discussing the non-destroy endings as though they are real as well as the Normandy escape shown in all three endings. The simple fact that even Bioware would never, ever withold the real ending to cash in on it later. They would be crucified. They would have had to mean this game actually only have ONE ending. No choice at all at the end. The entire fanbase would have to replay the endings with enough EMS (only to be gotten through MP) to get the supposed "real ending" to even continue the story which they would never, ever do. The whole indoc theory is ridiculously grasping at straws to a degree I've never even seen before.
#15198
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 03:02
savionen wrote...
kylecouch wrote...
simfamSP wrote...
kylecouch wrote...
I find a slight problem with
Illusive Man can shoot himself.....how does that apply to this?
It's mostly all symbolic, so think of the message behind these things.
I doubt BioWare are THAT good though :-/ who knows... I am starting to doubt this theory since it tends to read into things I don't think even BioWare would think of. If Chris Avellon was in the project then sure, but he isn't...
See thats the only reason I don't believe this....I don't think Bioware is anywhere near that talented...I reeeaallly don't. DA2 proved that to me personally, sure their different teams and all...but still.
DA2 was also one of the buggiest RPGs I've ever played, and DA2's graphics don't even come close to ME2 or ME3's. (I still enjoyed DA2, but just saying.) Same company, different artists, different writers, different QA, different amount of people working on it, etc.
Yes I know all that...but I just can't imagine their writers being that awsome....considering the DA team basiclly called us idiots for not understanding their "brilliance" when it came to the writeing......I mean....yea.
#15199
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 03:04
#15200
Posté 16 mars 2012 - 03:06
I like how there goes a bolt into the head on that sign too, like...indoctrination maybe.obie191970 wrote...
Warning
Just sayin...




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





