NubXL wrote...
I think you guys are giving BioWare way too much credit. Assuming they concocted some hallucination ending, with plans to patch in a real one later. What about people who bought it and don't have their console connected to the internet (yes, they exist)? Can you ever imagine EA backing a plan like that? The corporate suits' heads would explode. They play it as safe as possible. It's a PR nightmare waiting to happen.
Couple points.
1. The game is perfectly playable, and beatable, in the form that it exists in now. It's not like it shipped without an ending - okay, well, we would argue that it did, but that's a whole different issue - and people saw fit to review it like it was released. It was well-received by the reviewers.
2. You notice that it took us a good five or six days of close analysis before the idea even
occurred to us? The data we have all fits, yes, but that doesn't mean that it's obvious. What slipped by a few thousand incredibly dedicated fans for days could easily slip by a QA team... or the QA team could have just been given a "WAI" or "WNF" in response to bugs raised on the issue. Or they might even know! We can't be sure.
3. Corporate wouldn't necessarily disapprove of it if they said "Hey, we want to release this in this state, and then expand on our ending with a DLC pack later on." So long as said state wasn't unfinished and the game was well-received, I could see that getting approval.
4. The XBox and PS3 versions of the game require an internet connection. The PC version requires one for initial launch. The single player is, as you might be aware by now, tied heavily into their online system. The game is one of the big ways they're planning on pushing their new Steam competitor.
I think it's risky, yes, but it's also exploring new fields, and it fits pretty much every piece of data we have. Given how out there it is, I'm not willing to say "THIS IS REALLY WHAT HAPPENED" but I am certainly willing to consider it as a possibility.