Ce sujet est fermé
Eyjh wrote...
not sure if anyone seen this?
http://i1115.photobu...31778596081.png
tobito113 wrote...
Did anyone read what i just typed? :
The new twitter that was imediately deleted, they stated that there was no plan atm for a new ending. This is the only evidence we need to dismiss the theory as real, the ingame evidence might be compeling but the real world evidence is overwelming.
Ask Bioware to make the theory canon, but i dont believe they wanted it to be.
Eyjh wrote...
not sure if anyone seen this?
http://i1115.photobu...31778596081.png
Modifié par Sammuthegreat, 19 mars 2012 - 05:08 .
Sammuthegreat wrote...
blueboxblues wrote...
Sammuthegreat wrote...
wantedman dan wrote...
Sammuthegreat wrote...
Is this new?
It's a picture of some of the teasing Twitter replies Jessica Merizan has made over the last few days...
They're doing a lot of double-talk. It looks as though their PR division is so splintered, one hand doesn't know what the other is doing.
I'd say she steps well beyond PR double-speak in a lot of those responses...
@masseffect has had some interesting replies to people today as well.
A few more past responses halfway down this page (in italics).
Could you list a few of those "interesting" replies please?
JTP117 wrote...
tobito113 wrote...
Did anyone read what i just typed? :
The new twitter that was imediately deleted, they stated that there was no plan atm for a new ending. This is the only evidence we need to dismiss the theory as real, the ingame evidence might be compeling but the real world evidence is overwelming.
Ask Bioware to make the theory canon, but i dont believe they wanted it to be.
What they ment was that they are not going to change the pre-installed endings, instead they are going to use them as a step-ladder into new endings and DLC
It has been done before, with prinze of persia.Capeo wrote...
I can't believe this is still being debated. BW said last night they are not changing the endings. IT doesn't make sense and fits none of the actual evidence anyway (i.e. script, app, dev interviews, the friggin title screen at the end of the game, the epilogue, what BW said LAST NIGHT, etc.) but that's besides the point. BW admitted it already. These are the ends they intended.
Use your brains for a second. Outside of the above objective evidence (the IT depends on utterly subjective evidence) you honestly believe BW would have shipped their biggest game to date with an incomplete ending? Really? Think about that. The gaming press has already given their reviews which they are touting in their commercials. Millions have already played. You honestly think they are holding an ending in the wing that invalidates two of the final choices in the game? You think that wouldn't be a worse clusterF than this? Do you think the gaming press is going to go back and re-review the game? Do you think they wouldn't come out guns blazing over such a cheap deception?
Honestly, the whole idea is ridiculous.
Capeo wrote...
I can't believe this is still being debated. BW said last night they are not changing the endings. IT doesn't make sense and fits none of the actual evidence anyway (i.e. script, app, dev interviews, the friggin title screen at the end of the game, the epilogue, what BW said LAST NIGHT, etc.) but that's besides the point. BW admitted it already. These are the ends they intended.
Use your brains for a second. Outside of the above objective evidence (the IT depends on utterly subjective evidence) you honestly believe BW would have shipped their biggest game to date with an incomplete ending? Really? Think about that. The gaming press has already given their reviews which they are touting in their commercials. Millions have already played. You honestly think they are holding an ending in the wing that invalidates two of the final choices in the game? You think that wouldn't be a worse clusterF than this? Do you think the gaming press is going to go back and re-review the game? Do you think they wouldn't come out guns blazing over such a cheap deception?
Honestly, the whole idea is ridiculous.
Capeo wrote...
I can't believe this is still being debated. BW said last night they are not changing the endings. IT doesn't make sense and fits none of the actual evidence anyway (i.e. script, app, dev interviews, the friggin title screen at the end of the game, the epilogue, what BW said LAST NIGHT, etc.) but that's besides the point. BW admitted it already. These are the ends they intended.
Use your brains for a second. Outside of the above objective evidence (the IT depends on utterly subjective evidence) you honestly believe BW would have shipped their biggest game to date with an incomplete ending? Really? Think about that. The gaming press has already given their reviews which they are touting in their commercials. Millions have already played. You honestly think they are holding an ending in the wing that invalidates two of the final choices in the game? You think that wouldn't be a worse clusterF than this? Do you think the gaming press is going to go back and re-review the game? Do you think they wouldn't come out guns blazing over such a cheap deception?
Honestly, the whole idea is ridiculous.
Capeo wrote...
I can't believe this is still being debated. BW said last night they are not changing the endings. IT doesn't make sense and fits none of the actual evidence anyway (i.e. script, app, dev interviews, the friggin title screen at the end of the game, the epilogue, what BW said LAST NIGHT, etc.) but that's besides the point. BW admitted it already. These are the ends they intended.
Use your brains for a second. Outside of the above objective evidence (the IT depends on utterly subjective evidence) you honestly believe BW would have shipped their biggest game to date with an incomplete ending? Really? Think about that. The gaming press has already given their reviews which they are touting in their commercials. Millions have already played. You honestly think they are holding an ending in the wing that invalidates two of the final choices in the game? You think that wouldn't be a worse clusterF than this? Do you think the gaming press is going to go back and re-review the game? Do you think they wouldn't come out guns blazing over such a cheap deception?
Honestly, the whole idea is ridiculous.
Aedera wrote...
Only they retracted that statement from last night. That being said, you raise some good points. One day I think they will change it and the next I think they won't...
monrapias wrote...
http://koobismo.devi...llery/#/d4t2v53 funny
Pathero wrote...
Seriosuly, the longer this goes on, the more I LOVE IT.
I've spent more time looking at teh forums and Indoctreading than I have on multiplayer!
CHECK OUT THIS TWEET:
https://twitter.com/...792009009381376
The teasing. IT BURNS US.
Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
monrapias wrote...
http://koobismo.devi...llery/#/d4t2v53 funny
Marauder Shields was Nihlus?! Holy **** it all makes sense now! I knew he would not end as simply a dead body on Eden Prime!
JTP117 wrote...
Something I do not believe has been covered (though it may as well have since I've only been reading comments from Page 600 and up) is the damage to Shepard and his armor after the Harby blast-o-doom. Obviously many people customize their N7 armor to look different and get them the advantage on the enemy. But it's what happens to the armor that gets me thinking.
Okay, so Shepard is shot (indirectly mind you) with a laser we have seen cut through buildings, ships, tanks, and so on. Bear in mind that Shep is only what? 10 yards away when it hits? if that?
Now let's look at the damage to his body, his left arm has had the armor melted/blown clean off, where the arm itself really only has shrapnel damage. No real burnt tissue from what I can see, just bruising and bleeding, if the beam was hot enough to burn that armor off of him, you can be damn sure that arm would be in waaaaay worse shape.
Now let's look at custom-ability. When I play, my Shep never wears a helmet so I was very surprised when he woke up and only had minor scars when his entire breast-plate was scorched and melted. Unless you are a girl, your chest really isn't that far out in front of your face, and even then the distance would be so insignificant given the power of the blast.
After watching other play-throughs, I have noticed that the same thing happens to people who WERE wearing helmets. How is it that your helmet can be completely destroyed (no evidence of it being around you anywhere when you get up) but your face, for the most part, is in good shape? It just doesn't make sense.
Now I have never seen anyone do the hammer team charge with anything other than some form of N7 on, does anyone know how he looks if say you were wearing Terminus, Inferno, or even Collector armor? Does that change what he looks like when he is limping away or what he looks like in the rubble?
Modifié par nyrocron, 19 mars 2012 - 05:44 .
Earthborn_Shepard wrote...
A little short something to make you all feel better:
monrapias wrote...
It has been done before, with prinze of persia.Capeo wrote...
I can't believe this is still being debated. BW said last night they are not changing the endings. IT doesn't make sense and fits none of the actual evidence anyway (i.e. script, app, dev interviews, the friggin title screen at the end of the game, the epilogue, what BW said LAST NIGHT, etc.) but that's besides the point. BW admitted it already. These are the ends they intended.
Use your brains for a second. Outside of the above objective evidence (the IT depends on utterly subjective evidence) you honestly believe BW would have shipped their biggest game to date with an incomplete ending? Really? Think about that. The gaming press has already given their reviews which they are touting in their commercials. Millions have already played. You honestly think they are holding an ending in the wing that invalidates two of the final choices in the game? You think that wouldn't be a worse clusterF than this? Do you think the gaming press is going to go back and re-review the game? Do you think they wouldn't come out guns blazing over such a cheap deception?
Honestly, the whole idea is ridiculous.
Retour en haut
