MassEffectFan11 wrote...
N7xELITE wrote...
Maybe the child was his imagination, maybe the child was never there on earth. Nobody else seems to notice him????
I noticed that too, nobody but Shepard pays attention. And when you see the kid in the vent, a Reaper just happens to be walking by. And right before the kid gets blown up, he looks right at Shepard.
And it all is odd. Mostly, I am leaning towards him not being real at that point, but again, I haven't been fully convinced yet.
I guess maybe I should explain why I set myself against proof that comes up, even though I'm one of the original supporters.
You may all have noticed, but we aren't exactly popular on here, and for good reason. Every time someone finds something, instead of presenting it to be debated, they claim it as proof and wave it for all to see. Honestly, it's getting a bit out of hand that threads get continuously made not only relying on some of the more doubtful indicators, but that they prop up the theory as a fact, and not only a theory/speculation.
There are a lot of angry/disappointed fans on here. Heck, I'm sure some, if not most, of you were at some point. Trying to shove this view on them, while they do the same on here, isn't the way to go. We want the same things, but now there is a divide between the IT and literal interpretors, which is just insanely stupid of the community.
We are not about post-game DLC. We are not about what is/isn't facts, as there is no way to confirm or deny anything. This is about speculating on why the ending was executed as it was at a design and lore standpoint.
All-in-all, I'm here to make sure we don't get too ahead of ourselves, and debate it thouroughly here before throwing it out to the wolves. Not to police. Not to block opinions. Just to debate it as much as we can to make sure it holds.
I stand by IT theory. Let's just make sure what we are standing on is as solid as it can be.