"When the truth does come out..."
Is that a confirmation of the "truth" DLC?
Modifié par nyrocron, 25 mars 2012 - 11:23 .
Modifié par nyrocron, 25 mars 2012 - 11:23 .
Modifié par masster blaster, 25 mars 2012 - 11:29 .
Modifié par Turbotanden, 25 mars 2012 - 11:30 .
nyrocron wrote...
Wowowow... Chris Priestly in a conversation about the recent leak: https://twitter.com/...048052535963648
"When the truth does come out..."
Is that a confirmation of the "truth" DLC?
Those textures are used in many scenes and can be explained by simple asset reuse.masster blaster wrote...
tobito113 legalinho was saying that the dream texture was used in the part when Shepard get's knocked out after Harby attacks through out the rest of that point.
Modifié par nyrocron, 25 mars 2012 - 11:36 .
Turbotanden wrote...
My brother alerted me to an interesting point about the last track of the OST before the credits. It is called "An End, Once and For All", but I have never in my life heard a song finish in that way without leading up to something.
Disregard what happens during the in game video and just listen to the end of this song. Then imagine Shepard taking a wake up-breath right after the end of it.
Modifié par BleedingUranium, 25 mars 2012 - 11:41 .
masster blaster wrote...
But you all have to admit the whole Adam and Eve thing at the end was funny, especially when your love interest comes out with Joker and we all know that if they can not get back to Shepard there is only one thing left to do.
earth_angel wrote...
it seems they will tell us at PAX 2012
byne wrote...
Rksmithers wrote...
[...] PEOPLE [...] scare the hell out of me... [...] quote me [...] be fox news...
I agree. People are scary. I have taken your advice and quoted you, just like Fox News!
Paraphrasing is fun.
Baltar2009 wrote...
Well I'm not going to wade through ~900 pages of posts but I will add my $0.02.
My principle objection to the indoctrination theory, even before questioning what appears to be pretty clear pattern seeking, is this:
If the intent really was to close the trilogy with a hallucination, and therefore not actually resolve the conflict sprawling across three games...shame on the writers of such an ending. It is still every bit as bad as if the ending we have now were actually the literal ending, which I'm 99% sure it is.
QED.
Modifié par Denvian, 25 mars 2012 - 11:52 .
nyrocron wrote...
Wowowow... Chris Priestly in a conversation about the recent leak: https://twitter.com/...048052535963648
"When the truth does come out..."
Is that a confirmation of the "truth" DLC?
Denvian wrote...
Baltar2009 wrote...
Well I'm not going to wade through ~900 pages of posts but I will add my $0.02.
My principle objection to the indoctrination theory, even before questioning what appears to be pretty clear pattern seeking, is this:
If the intent really was to close the trilogy with a hallucination, and therefore not actually resolve the conflict sprawling across three games...shame on the writers of such an ending. It is still every bit as bad as if the ending we have now were actually the literal ending, which I'm 99% sure it is.
QED.
I think the interesting part about the Indoc theory is people noticed the pattern before they had a theory for it. I noticed everything that was pointed out but I could not put my finger on why it was out of place or what the significance of these things were.
And that would suck if they did not end up resolving things...
Something based on this would be a great bad ending IMO.N7xELITE wrote...
......Watch this its interesting.(and no its not a funny video)
No you fought Saren in the top of Presidium Tower, while your meeting with the Starchild is on the other side of that platform ("under" the Presidium Tower), watch the cutscene where Crucible and Citadel dock, you are in between of them (when you speak to Starchild, the Crucible is above you).masster blaster wrote...
Oh wait the Catalyst scene is actually taking place on the Citidle Counsel place were you fought Saren just up top so why hasn't anyone seen this before Vinisor with a ? mark?