158 réponses à ce sujet

[nitefyre410]

Spectre_Shepard wrote...

*snip* 


yeah the music was terrific.

haunting.

but in the wrong sort of way.

 

I try not to let it ruin it the music ..but yeah...  haunting for all the wrong reasons.. 

All the great moments of the game have this asteriek next them... like  Barry Bonds homerun record. Its tragic... really. 

Modifié par nitefyre410, 15 mars 2012 - 03:24 .

[Catroi]

No they didn't
I'm sorry guys, the game is good but not awesome, there are so many weakness...
It's not an RPG anymore it's a TPS and I know for sure that when I play a Mass Effect game I want to play an RPG not a shooter, if I wanted a shooter I would have played, hum I don't know? Gears of War for example...
Let me tell you all the things I'm disapointed with:
- Less dialogues with nearly no choices and Shepard answering automaticaly
- Less squadmates with NO "deeper involvment", a lot of the time it's just autodialogue, even the "calibrations" were more interactive. Plus we don't get any loyalty missions, even in ME1 each of our squadmates gave us something to do.
- Only one hub, the citadelle, wich is just a small corridor. ME2's citadelle had disapointed me but this is worst! Oh and btw, why do they always change everything? Like the human ambassy?
- No appearance of a lot of secondary characters
- Cameo appearances of old ME2 squadmates: I'm really sad for those who romanced Jacob or Jack...
- The whole endmission is bullcrap: The suicide mission felt way more epic with you choosing what role your squadmates will be playing, etc... Oh and also no appearance of EMS, the rachni are the worst because it felt like such a huge decision and what did we get? Yay 100 EMS and that's all! just a number in a menu!
- Very few side missions and all of them consist of shooting. I don't mind having most of them being like that but ALL of them? Hell no! I remember this mission in ME1 where biotics had taken a politician hostage: that was awsome negociating his liberation and all!

So no the game is not Perfect it's actually far from it but I agree on one thing: without the ending fixed they can fix all the aformentioned (I think that's what you say in english...) problems it'll still be crappy because of the ending.
But oh well they wanted it to go mainstream just for the cash-grab I can't blame them but I guess I'm one of the few who prefered ME1 to ME2 because it was getting less and less an RPG and more and more an action game =(

[Dusty Boy T]

It would have been great. Now that the end tainted my view on the game, however, I'm starting to find a lot more wrong with it...

[ElectronicPostingInterface]

It's like, when I watch a movie that is bad, I don't care the ending is bad.

I only care if what came before was something I was invested in.

[Spectre_Shepard]

important not to forget how great a game it was overall.... too bad

[Computron2000]

As EDI said "And just like that the magic's gone". And the magic was freaking strong up to when Shepard was saying "I can't see..., I don't know whats wrong..."

[TrueHD]

Not really. I felt nothing for Earth at the beginning of the game; practically nothing happens other than a giant desk flying at you. You leave way too quickly.

And the game completely stopped being Mass Effect when you land in London, with old-ass telephone booths around.

[merylisk]

Yeah. This game/series was 99% on it's way to being my favorite thing ever.

I want it to be that. I don't want it to be "almost" and I don't want it to be remembered for having a terrible dismount. I want it to be what it almost was.

[Spectre_Shepard]

merylisk wrote...

Yeah. This game/series was 99% on it's way to being my favorite thing ever.

I want it to be that. I don't want it to be "almost" and I don't want it to be remembered for having a terrible dismount. I want it to be what it almost was.

yes