Why is the only argument against changing the endings come down to fairy tale?
#1
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:30
#2
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:34
What internally consistent and sensible solution is there at this point? Short of changing the plot up until the ending?
#3
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:36
#4
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:38
QuirkyGroundhog wrote...
You're Shepard on the Citadel. The Crucible is connected. The fleet is losing badly, as we knew it would, the Crucible was our last hope. The Catalyst tells you the deal.
What internally consistent and sensible solution is there at this point? Short of changing the plot up until the ending?
Adding an epilogue telling us what happens after that in more details maybe?
Something like... say... Dragon Age: Origins' Epilogue from which we learn what happens after the Archdemon is dealt with and most Darkspawn retreat back into the Deep Roads? Yeah something like that. No necessary need for a "blue babies on a farm" happily ever after type of ending. What's necessary is information.
Modifié par Lyrandori, 10 mars 2012 - 08:38 .
#5
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:38
QuirkyGroundhog wrote...
What internally consistent and sensible solution is there at this point?
Instead of collapsing on a magic elevator that takes you to visit a magical Reaper God Child, the Crucible acts the way everyone expects it to, and shoots a billion lasers that kill all the Reapers.
Congratulations. You now have a satisfying, internally consistent and sensible solution.
Modifié par KingNothing125, 10 mars 2012 - 08:38 .
#6
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:38
#7
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:39
All of that is totally fine. Just through in an ending where you make it work, and everyone is completely happy. Even if it's just a button push, that's fine. I'll walk through the corpse hallway to kill TIM and push a button, and then gleefully watch credits.QuirkyGroundhog wrote...
You're Shepard on the Citadel. The Crucible is connected. The fleet is losing badly, as we knew it would, the Crucible was our last hope. The Catalyst tells you the deal.
What internally consistent and sensible solution is there at this point? Short of changing the plot up until the ending?
#8
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:41
#9
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:41
#10
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:45
#11
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:46
#12
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:48
QuirkyGroundhog wrote...
You're Shepard on the Citadel. The Crucible is connected. The fleet is losing badly, as we knew it would, the Crucible was our last hope. The Catalyst tells you the deal.
What internally consistent and sensible solution is there at this point? Short of changing the plot up until the ending?
You answered your own question.
You. Are. Shepard.
Shepard doesn't care about rules, about odds. That's the whole point about him/her. He can accomplish the impossible, and s/he never bows before adversity. Shepard always finds a way. That is, until now.
#13
Guest_MissNet_*
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:53
Guest_MissNet_*
#14
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:54
QuirkyGroundhog wrote...
But....the Catalyst is not an anti-Reaper weapon...that's not the point of it. So no...
Says who? The dumb Reaper God Child Thing in the current stupid ending? Who cares. Rewrite it.
#15
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:56
#16
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:56
Modifié par AxisEvolve, 10 mars 2012 - 08:56 .
#17
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:56
QuirkyGroundhog wrote...
You're Shepard on the Citadel. The Crucible is connected. The fleet is losing badly, as we knew it would, the Crucible was our last hope. The Catalyst tells you the deal.
What internally consistent and sensible solution is there at this point? Short of changing the plot up until the ending?
#18
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 08:57
KingNothing125 wrote...
QuirkyGroundhog wrote...
But....the Catalyst is not an anti-Reaper weapon...that's not the point of it. So no...
Says who? The dumb Reaper God Child Thing in the current stupid ending? Who cares. Rewrite it.
I agree. We didn't know what the Crucible did until the end of the game, and if we weren't happy with the ending and there's a new one, what's the big deal? Besides, I honestly thought that the red ending was just going to kill Reapers and Geth, not eradicate Technology.
#19
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 09:02
Sure the civilizations of the galaxy didn't create the reapers but even if they never made an AI they would still get harvested after meeting the FTL and size factors for the cycle. (If their real mission was to stop rouge AI incidents then they would just monitor and cull systems that developed an advanced AI so that it would never happen. )
Their reason for existence is just poor and its easy to see how their objective is incomprehensible.
#20
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 09:08
actually me either
ps: sry for bad english if existing
#21
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 09:11
I dont get your argument, the bad ending makes sense and is the only option because the bad ending says so? Up until the bad last 5-10 minutes anti-reaper weapons was EXACTLY what the crucible was sold as.QuirkyGroundhog wrote...
But....the Catalyst is not an anti-Reaper weapon...that's not the point of it. So no...
#22
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 09:14
QuirkyGroundhog wrote...
You're Shepard on the Citadel. The Crucible is connected. The fleet is losing badly, as we knew it would, the Crucible was our last hope. The Catalyst tells you the deal.
What internally consistent and sensible solution is there at this point? Short of changing the plot up until the ending?
Nobody's saying the dots don't connect. They're saying the lines between them are a bit too long and wiggly.
#23
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 09:14
pomrink wrote...
The catalyst is where the internal consistency breaks
This.
#24
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 09:16
#25
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 09:31
Reapers = synthetic/organic hybrid race, that kills all organic civilizations every 'cycle', yes that's right, kills, as being liquefied doesn't leave much room for living on no matter how much they want to spew the "we're ascending your people" line.
These reapers do this to make sure synthetics don't rise up and kill all organics.. So to solve all organics being killed by synthetics, you systematically kill all organics, over and over and over..
Makes total sense.. Hey, I heard you've got cancer, lemme bash your brains out to save you from it... Oh, you're having trouble paying your mortgage? I'll just light your house on fire so you don't have to worry about it. What's that? The oceans are being over fished? Well lets just nuke all the fish so that doesn't happen.
Modifié par Revan312, 10 mars 2012 - 09:32 .





Retour en haut







