60 réponses à ce sujet

[Grumpy Midget]

When presented with the three choices at the end, I'd give the stupid kid the middle finger, then proceed to contact Admiral Hackett. I would tell him that earth is lost, and he should retreat what's left of the fleet back through the mass relay. The last ship to reach the relay blows it up, wiping out the solar system in order to prevent the reapers from harvesting the earth's population while taking out a sizable chunk of the reaper fleet in the process.

Because that's preferable to any of the endings the game gives you.

Modifié par Grumpy Midget, 10 mars 2012 - 05:55 .

[Nobrandminda]

I went with the Synthesis ending because it seemed to me that the game was subtly suggesting that that was the correct choice. When the Star Child presents the Destruction option, you see Anderson doing so, when he presents the Control option, you see the Illusive Man doing so. When he presents the Synthesis option, no such clip is shown, which to me implied that this was Shepard's choice, instead of the choice of another.

After going back and looking at the other endings, Synthesis is still my first choice, if only because it is such a Deux Ex Machina that it's somewhat easier to believe that all of the issues with the ending (Quarians never getting to see their homeworld again, Normandy stuck on Neverland, Endor Holocaust on earth from the Citadel exploding) will magically work themselves out.

[Lord fiSh]

Destroy, so that Sheppard is alive , also synergy, so that Joker and EDI can be together  

[Sashimi_taco]

It pissed me off that I had proven the guardian's point of synthetics will destroy life completely wrong with the geth/quarian peace. I wanted destroy because dammit i wanted to LIVE but he negated the work i had done with the geth and quarians by killing the geth. It is so ****ing stupid I can't stand it. If we were going to kill all synthetic life, then the quarians would die as well since they have so much tech in them.

What exactly is synthetic life anyway? A program? A machine?

It doesn't even matter if I live or not anyway since I never get to see my LI and crew ever again. I doomed them by taking me with me. I hate this so much.

[Dynomite15]

Nobrandminda wrote...

I went with the Synthesis ending because it seemed to me that the game was subtly suggesting that that was the correct choice. When the Star Child presents the Destruction option, you see Anderson doing so, when he presents the Control option, you see the Illusive Man doing so. When he presents the Synthesis option, no such clip is shown, which to me implied that this was Shepard's choice, instead of the choice of another.

After going back and looking at the other endings, Synthesis is still my first choice, if only because it is such a Deux Ex Machina that it's somewhat easier to believe that all of the issues with the ending (Quarians never getting to see their homeworld again, Normandy stuck on Neverland, Endor Holocaust on earth from the Citadel exploding) will magically work themselves out.

I like that theory.  I also chose synthetic because it was the oddest and most interesting, I wanted to see what everyone looked like.

[HKR148]

Synthesis is the easiest way out and the most unethical option even considering the controlling the reapers. So because some insane vent-kid robot is telling you that cycle will repeat over and over again while the entire storyline was dedicated to prove this wrong and difference between life-form can be acceptable and possibly co-exist is beyond me. What is the purpose of this ultimate contradiction? Is this the vision of humanity that Bioware believes in?

[3Minotaur3]

I crawled to the blue one at the left first, because I assumed blue=paragon ending...

Then I couldn't believe my eyes and tried the red 'Shoot-it' one, just to see if it was as bad...

Modifié par 3Minotaur3, 10 mars 2012 - 07:34 .

[Chromako]

I chose the control ending. Shepard, while "destroyed," whatever that indicates , still has control over the reapers. So her consciousness/will can't be entirely gone, right? The indoctrination mechanism was disabled at the very end when that kid appeared.

I decided that since femshep was so dedicated to killing the reapers, she had them lift off and self-destruct / disable themselves and let themselves be shot at. You wouldn't want them to be destroyed while inside London, right? There wouldn't be enough time to let her be "corrupted" due to the power she got, as the alliance would simply destroy the reaper bodies when they stopped fighting and lifted off.

The "destroy" ending would be horrible, as so many people are supported with synthetics, and their destruction would kill the galactic way of life. That wouldn't be acceptable.

[kramerfan86]

I went destruction, didnt trust the creator of the reapers that they could be controlled or that giving in to machine-organic merger like a bunch of super husks was safe. Decided to finish it while the chance was there. Moot point though, all three endings are the same end result pretty much.

[Kiltman]

Synthesis...only way to stop the cycle for sure....plus now Edi and Joker can has robo-human babies

[MattFini]

I did synthesis last night ... but only because I was so confused/baffled by the whole thing that I just lumbered forward in disbelief.

Today, my fiancee wanted to see what was so bad about the ending, so I reloaded my save and went though it again - this time choosing the "destroy" option. Um, I guess this is now my canon choice? If only because stopping the Reapers once and for all was always Shep's goal - and, of course, the hint that he/she may still be alive at the end.

But I couldn't imagine replaying this from the beginning with a new Shep. It's just too damn unrewarding and thankless.