64 réponses à ce sujet

[cipher86]

Yep.

[G3rman]

I shouldn't have to pay for a satisfying ending.

[twistedforsaken]

buts thats bethesda, i used to think real highly of bioware but many things have made me think twice about them, theyre just out for the money same with every other dev, its the sad truth one we have to get on with

[DTKT]

The issue at hand is that Bioware just discarded ME1 and ME2. Fallout had an "okay" ending, not an ending that makes you wonder why you played through ME3.

[Mr. MannlyMan]

Blame hardcore gamers for spending a fortune on their games.

[hawat333]

No.

It wasn't released to amend the ending. It was necessary to keep the main character alive because the DLC were basically post-game DLC.
That was the reason. Not that they wanted to amend anything.

[Eag07]

G3rman wrote...

I shouldn't have to pay for a satisfying ending.

Yep, you shouldn't. But you will. We both know it, if they release a DLC pack fixing that abomination  the majority of game owners will buy it. Such DLC would practically be a guaranteed profit. I wouldn't be surprised if that was EA's intention from the begining - make endings a bad joke and then charge for the fix... remember the whole thing with treatment of Liara in ME2? Screwed up bad, then fixed with a DLC players gladly and gratefully bought?

Funny, what kind of ideas can mind filled with all-consuming hatred conjure...

[Farbautisonn]

I actually liked the FO3 ending. You had a "renegade" and a "paragon" option.

[G3rman]

Eag07 wrote...

G3rman wrote...

I shouldn't have to pay for a satisfying ending.

Yep, you shouldn't. But you will. We both know it, if they release a DLC pack fixing that abomination  the majority of game owners will buy it. Such DLC would practically be a guaranteed profit. I wouldn't be surprised if that was EA's intention from the begining - make endings a bad joke and then charge for the fix... remember the whole thing with treatment of Liara in ME2? Screwed up bad, then fixed with a DLC players gladly and gratefully bought?

Funny, what kind of ideas can mind filled with all-consuming hatred conjure...

I won't actually.

I'll just youtube the damn thing.

[Dionkey]

G3rman wrote...

I shouldn't have to pay for a satisfying ending.

[DJ CAVE SLAVE]

^Thats why I don't like cannon DLCs, if it happens whether I buy it or not, might as well just watch it on youtube.

[DeinonSlayer]

At this point, I think they'll pretty much have to. It's starting to get noticed outside this forum.

http://www.gamefront...ffect-3-ending/
http://www.ign.com/b...em-the-trilogy/

You don't climb a mountain just so someone waiting at the top can kick you in the balls and send you tumbling all the way back down. You certainly don't climb it a second time for the same treatment. How they thought this ending would give the game any kind of replay value is a mystery to me.

Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 10 mars 2012 - 08:21 .

[Ronin1325]

hawat333 wrote...

No.

It wasn't released to amend the ending. It was necessary to keep the main character alive because the DLC were basically post-game DLC.
That was the reason. Not that they wanted to amend anything.

Huh. It's been 4 years, but I had thought the 'Broken Steel' expansion for Fallout 3 actually *did * have fan dissatisfaction with the ending as a major reason for its creation. Especially given how snottily the game treats you if you pick Fawkes to go into the reaction chamber. 

[Saberchic]

Dionkey wrote...

G3rman wrote...

I shouldn't have to pay for a satisfying ending.

Count me in this group.

[PirateT138]

The ending for FO3 sucked because they half-assed the post-ending wrap-up.
Part of the cool part in the series was to see how your choices echoed even years after.
Then Bethesda was like, "herp derp u ded" -fin

[JohnCena94]

cipher86 wrote...

Yep.

To me fallout's made sense.  Granted a certain character was just about the biggest douche in video game history, but in comparsion that ending does not have anything on Mass Effect 3's ending. 

[AkiKishi]

Fallout is different because it cut you off when there could still be a lot of game left to play. In ME3 by the end the game is already over.

[Bad King]

FO3 had a good ending- in my opinion the Broken Steel DLC felt very artificial in how it was tacked on (although overall the DLC was quite enjoyable).

[AkiKishi]

Bad King wrote...

FO3 had a good ending- in my opinion the Broken Steel DLC felt very artificial in how it was tacked on (although overall the DLC was quite enjoyable).

My problem with the ending was I had Fawkes stood 5 feet away. I can't believe they overlooked that possibility.

[Bad King]

Farbautisonn wrote...

I actually liked the FO3 ending. You had a "renegade" and a "paragon" option.

There was also the 'derp' ending which I ended up achieving after screwing up with activating the water purifier.

[Bad King]

BobSmith101 wrote...

Bad King wrote...

FO3 had a good ending- in my opinion the Broken Steel DLC felt very artificial in how it was tacked on (although overall the DLC was quite enjoyable).

My problem with the ending was I had Fawkes stood 5 feet away. I can't believe they overlooked that possibility.

Agreed, what they did with Fawkes was a mistake, him being radiation resistant and everything. But I didn't have him with me in my game- it ended with an emotional "Goodbye boy, I'm going to miss you" to dogmeat.

When my character was randomly ressurected in Broken Steel, I felt somewhat robbed of an emotional ending. It would be like the Warden randomly 'waking up' after dying at the end of DA:O.

Modifié par Bad King, 10 mars 2012 - 08:24 .

[nitefyre410]

BobSmith101 wrote...

Bad King wrote...

FO3 had a good ending- in my opinion the Broken Steel DLC felt very artificial in how it was tacked on (although overall the DLC was quite enjoyable).

My problem with the ending was I had Fawkes stood 5 feet away. I can't believe they overlooked that possibility.

 

Dang you beat me to it ...I was about  to say  that..  I had Fawkes..  radation resistent friendly super mutant.. 

"No I can't do that.." 

me: WTF 

[JohnCena94]

nitefyre410 wrote...

BobSmith101 wrote...

Bad King wrote...

FO3 had a good ending- in my opinion the Broken Steel DLC felt very artificial in how it was tacked on (although overall the DLC was quite enjoyable).

My problem with the ending was I had Fawkes stood 5 feet away. I can't believe they overlooked that possibility.

 

Dang you beat me to it ...I was about  to say  that..  I had Fawkes..  radation resistent friendly super mutant.. 

"No I can't do that.." 

me: WTF 

I played after the update, If I had not ,before I would have went in, I would have shot him

Modifié par JohnCena94, 10 mars 2012 - 08:25 .

[DarthKoza]

This must be the free DLC - I always loved BioWare, but now...

Modifié par DarthKoza, 10 mars 2012 - 08:29 .

[Farbautisonn]

BobSmith101 wrote...

Bad King wrote...

FO3 had a good ending- in my opinion the Broken Steel DLC felt very artificial in how it was tacked on (although overall the DLC was quite enjoyable).

My problem with the ending was I had Fawkes stood 5 feet away. I can't believe they overlooked that possibility.

-Oh, year... That "feature". I found it amusing but not really critical. Oversight... a bad one to be sure, but not the worst kind.