Aller au contenu

Photo

Still sore about the ending? This may help soothe one of those wounds (dev comments).


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
207 réponses à ce sujet

#51
BrotherFluffy

BrotherFluffy
  • Members
  • 561 messages

GBGriffin wrote...

It's really an odd move to make, to condition us to care about our squad, who become the closest to us as a PC and a player, and then to say, "They don't matter because the galaxy might be better off and your sacrifice was necessary for them."

I don't care about the millions, billions, trillions, whatever number of faceless characters in the galaxy I saved. I care about the outcome of the small group of lovable characters I've been leading for 3 games.


This.

#52
Gigerstreak

Gigerstreak
  • Members
  • 158 messages
http://www.ign.com/b...em-the-trilogy/

#53
Hakumen

Hakumen
  • Members
  • 222 messages
Well, for me it was pretty obvious that Joker was trying to get out with the Normandy crew as far away as possible from that blue/red/green energy blasts from Mass Relays. And now all of a sudden the relays are not exploded, but just destroyed, which means that these are just fancy fireworks. So, why the hell blast wave put Normandy down on some random planet? I can only imagine what one of these "not explosions" did to the nearest planet or such.

#54
Captain_Obvious

Captain_Obvious
  • Members
  • 1 236 messages
You know, no offense to the developers and their honest intentions to provide a good game, but if we have to rant and rave and complain to get someone to explain the ending to us, then obviously they did the ending wrong. This isn't about resolving a philosophical difference with the developers or writers, it's about playing a game where the ending was so completely out of left field that you require additional resources independent of the game to make sense of it.

It's about an ending that breaks the continuity of the series themes so badly as to be jarring and confusing rather than an unexpected plot twist.

It's about perception that making significant decisions have been rendered insignificant.

It's about ending a trilogy without ending it, and it's about creating questions where there should have been answers.

ME3 was a fantastic game with the worst ending I've ever played, bar none. I'm sorry, but that's how I feel, and no amount of trying to explain the ending in a forum is going to change that for me.

#55
Superninfreak

Superninfreak
  • Members
  • 128 messages

manwiththemachinegun wrote...

The problem with this line of logic is that the universe is set up to make the same mistakes again generations in the future. Eventually civilization will recreate mass relays, etc, and the reaper cycle can eventually start anew (with the possible exception of one ending choice with its own flaws).


Only if you believe people never learn from mistakes. What Shepard says to the catalyst at the end is, "no, it's NOT inevitable."

This wasn't a conventional war, Shepard says this. This is a war about survival. You broke your arm punching out cosmic gods. It's not fun. We're shown in the good endings life on Earth does survive. Do people even realize the difference between a 'dark age' and losing Mass Effect technology is?

Humans aren't going back to living in caves. FTL travel still likely works. It may take generations but society will rebuild.


Losing the relays completely cripples the society and makes every society have to live in a bubble, and many species are lacking food in the Sol system.

Many planets are also probably dependent on Mass Relay travel now. I wouldn't be suprised if some species imported most of their food from across the galaxy.

Imagine if humanity lost airtravel and had to go back to using boats to transport things. That would arguably cause less damage than losing the relays.

I get the idea that the costs were going to be high, but weren't they already high enough? We lost trillions of people, and Shepard worked so damn hard. Why can't we have a victory that doesn't ruin things so much?

#56
Phaedra Sanguine

Phaedra Sanguine
  • Members
  • 480 messages

manwiththemachinegun wrote...

Shepard survives and so does most of the crew. You get a half hour scene pre final assault where you get to say GOODBYE to all your surviving friends.

That is character focused.

I'm not trying to change people's minds, I'm just pointing out maybe things aren't quite as bleak as they may seem.

Just thought some more info for you would put things in perspective.

If the final battle was all Ewoks and dancing, people would be complaining the Reapers were too "weak" and not a credible threat over the course of thee games.

We broke our arms punching out Cthulu. That's not unreasonable.

Even in the 'nice' ending the goal of the Reapers has been accomplished. Space faring civilizations have been set back to industrial or pre-industrial levels and many other species may just go extinct.


You are completely wrong. All organic life has not been wiped out. The Reapers are dead or pacified. The cycle is broken. The galaxy has a chance to pick its own future free of the Reapers. FTL travel still exists.

This is not opinion, this is a fact. There will be horrible fallout but also a chance to rebuild.


What this guy said. There is too much of a hive-mind mentallity going on here. Just because movies always give you 100% happy endings doesn't mean a story as a great as Mass Effect will. The only thing I agree with in any of these discussions is that the Normandy crash scene was a little confusing, but aside from that it all makes sense.

Your decisions DID matter. Why do you think you deserve 57 different endings for every little detail you changed? You saw the effect of your choices THROUGHOUT EACH GAME.

No, you don't get to build a home with Tali or whoever you chose - you fought a damn war against almost invincible machines and had to use an alien super-weapon to stop them. IT'S NOT GONNA BE THAT HAPPY. 

Stop whining. Cool off. Walk outside, take a breath of fresh air and reflect on the story you've experienced and the characters you've learned to love. It's not totally over, anyway. Just Shepard.

#57
SandTrout

SandTrout
  • Members
  • 4 171 messages

Heldenbrand wrote...

The more accurate parallel would be; now imagine after Leningrad has been completely cut off from the rest of the world. Those few people who managed to survive the brutality of the war and its unadulterated destruction now have to somehow scrape together survival without trade, without agriculture (after all, I imagine the fields aren't in good shape, neither is the livestock) and with a population that has been severely depleted.

I imagine at this point many homeworld civilizations no longer depend upon locally grown crops but likely import due to massive urban congestion. The soil is likely in no shape to support growth and the amount of fires have likely polluted the atmospheres severely. Also consider that a majority of all the fleets are now stuck around Earth, very likely straining that one systems resources beyond survival.

Now consider also that the Quarians who fought so hard to get their home and numbers had already suffered extreme losses due to the war with the Geth are now trapped in the Sol system as well, with a smaller segment of their population on Rannoch. Now let's say you took the good ending and all those Geth that were supporting them suddenly are destroyed. All those Geth that were helping them rebuild and repair their immune systems.

Now lets look at the Krogan. They were cured of their genophage, but held together solely by the leadership of Wrex and Eve. Wrex has been trapped on Earth, so now Eve has to hold it together.  Their planet was already devastated by nuclear conflict; I doubt any livestock or crops are going to grow there.  Now look at the fact they are very likely facing a sudden population explosion and have suddently been cut off from the rest of the galaxy.  How long will it take them to turn on them in the same manner that Thane described happening to his own planet?

It's silly writing to expect that; "the war is over, things are rough but life goes on". They're right, life does go on but most of the civilizations would be absolutely ruined for thousands of years to come. Some civilizations may not survive at all.

Even in the 'nice' ending the goal of the Reapers has been accomplished. Space faring civilizations have been set back to industrial or pre-industrial levels and many other species may just go extinct.

Truth.

#58
Muezick

Muezick
  • Members
  • 621 messages
people who played all three games and enjoyed all three games are in denial about this ending being anything but bad.

16 different endings my ass. there's over a hundred different kinds of penny to.

There are three endings and they ALL drop the proverbial bomb on the entire galaxy.

Modifié par Muezick, 10 mars 2012 - 09:03 .


#59
jestermarcus

jestermarcus
  • Members
  • 18 messages
Yes the relays did destroy all life in their respective solar systems (namely most species home planets). If it was just a shock wave destroying the reapers, Joker would not have to fly at FTL speeds to escape it. Sure colonies on planets in distant solar systems might survive, but only as long as they are on garden worlds.

#60
Avilan II

Avilan II
  • Members
  • 285 messages

Slappy Ya Face wrote...

I don't care about earth, the quarians, the geth, the turians or even the krogan. Unite shepard with the squad and I'll walk away a satisfied fan.


This is actually something I DON't agree with. Only a pure renegade Shepard who is also completely insane would prioritize his friends over the galaxy. 

That said, I want Bioware to add all of their intentions to some sort of epilogue. 
Also: No mass relays =/= "stone age".

#61
JimJohnJim

JimJohnJim
  • Members
  • 121 messages
Its pretty bad when their own devs need to try and rationalize their own endings to try and make some sense out of this.

#62
Ukjack44

Ukjack44
  • Members
  • 323 messages
I must say I agree with the developer. You'd almost think its like we are playing a game and want to have fun.... No but seriously how can you liken a ****** poor ending in the game to WWII Russia!

#63
WarBaby2

WarBaby2
  • Members
  • 1 019 messages

MPSai wrote...

That would be fine if any of this was explored in the least in-game.


Exactly... If you do a 2 hour+ build up for the final battle, you cannot end the game in 5 minutes.

#64
Tartilus

Tartilus
  • Members
  • 68 messages

Paxcorpus wrote...

What this guy said. There is too much of a hive-mind mentallity going on here. Just because movies always give you 100% happy endings doesn't mean a story as a great as Mass Effect will. The only thing I agree with in any of these discussions is that the Normandy crash scene was a little confusing, but aside from that it all makes sense.

Your decisions DID matter. Why do you think you deserve 57 different endings for every little detail you changed? You saw the effect of your choices THROUGHOUT EACH GAME.

No, you don't get to build a home with Tali or whoever you chose - you fought a damn war against almost invincible machines and had to use an alien super-weapon to stop them. IT'S NOT GONNA BE THAT HAPPY. 

Stop whining. Cool off. Walk outside, take a breath of fresh air and reflect on the story you've experienced and the characters you've learned to love. It's not totally over, anyway. Just Shepard.


It must be very reassuring knowing that your opinions are always the reasonable ones and everyone who disagrees with you is just 'whining.' I'm sure that'll get you far.

#65
nitefyre410

nitefyre410
  • Members
  • 8 944 messages

Captain_Obvious wrote...

You know, no offense to the developers and their honest intentions to provide a good game, but if we have to rant and rave and complain to get someone to explain the ending to us, then obviously they did the ending wrong. This isn't about resolving a philosophical difference with the developers or writers, it's about playing a game where the ending was so completely out of left field that you require additional resources independent of the game to make sense of it.

It's about an ending that breaks the continuity of the series themes so badly as to be jarring and confusing rather than an unexpected plot twist.

It's about perception that making significant decisions have been rendered insignificant.

It's about ending a trilogy without ending it, and it's about creating questions where there should have been answers.

ME3 was a fantastic game with the worst ending I've ever played, bar none. I'm sorry, but that's how I feel, and no amount of trying to explain the ending in a forum is going to change that for me.

 

thank you Captian Obilivous...  =]  


  I agree that game was so good up until the end its just heart breaking. The Game had a real Earn you happy ending vibe going.. its going to  dark but light at the end of the tunnel but damn it you going to make it.  Instead we get crappy, very poorly done,  bioware trying to play philosopher nonsense... smh 

#66
-Area51-Silent

-Area51-Silent
  • Members
  • 678 messages
I think we are missing a point here, I will be completely honest, I thought the endings were fine, they simply stopped short of what they should have been. Shepard dying makes sense! he is an action hero, and to think of him simply wiling away like in the beginning of Mass Effect 2, doing mundane BS just doesn't make any sense. Shepard is a warrior of the galaxy, and it is well within his character to die a glorious and impressive death to bring about the end of the cycle! That much I am fine with.

My issue stems from the lack of follow up. The game is a very character diven game, and like many of those, we see an aftermath and follow up with characters that played important roles. There should be more of a follow up with what happened after some of the rebuild, with the crew members of the Normandy. Can you have an ending where they survivded? did the love interest survive? what happened with those who fought with you? Since there is no next game where we can see what happened, is why it left so many people flat.

#67
kramerfan86

kramerfan86
  • Members
  • 346 messages
The more I think about this the more it makes me angry.  We are really supposed to celebrate the destruction of the one positive thing the reapers left the galaxy?  Especially after we spent so much effort to save glactic society?  Please, in the dumb "stargazer" epilogue its clear that even after such a long period of time has passed that Shepard is a mere legend and not history that society still hasnt regained an interstellar level of technology.  That sucks, that isnt joyful rebuilding like Leningrad.

#68
Kloborgg711

Kloborgg711
  • Members
  • 833 messages
Um, if we just killed the Reapers at the end, then it would be like Leningrad/Petersburg. Trillions would have died, the entire galaxy would've need to be rebuilt with a shattered economy on all fronts. And yet, we would've won. We would've had closure. Temporary troubles like rebuilding are nothing.

No, that's not what we get. We see everything we fight for taken away. A better analogy would be like "What if after the fight for Leningrad, everyone was relocated to isolated regions and their technology was pushed back into the stone ages. Sure, everyone is now stranded, wearing tiger-skin loincloths and using sticks to start fires, but at least the Germans are gone!

#69
locsphere

locsphere
  • Members
  • 422 messages
I would rather the reapers winning as an ending and the cycle resuming than the ending we got. I am writing a new ending deserving of all of our hard work and sending it to Bioware ASAP. I have all spring break to write it. I will release it via my facebook page. I only want credit for writing it if it is ever used. Thats it, When you make a trilogy people need closure for all their hard work, they need to be rewarded, the difficult choices need to be rewarded regardless of the future games that could come to be. This ending is a cheat, Its like saying it all was just a dream. This story is epic and amazing, but its end is disgusting

#70
Phaedra Sanguine

Phaedra Sanguine
  • Members
  • 480 messages

Tartilus wrote...

Paxcorpus wrote...

What this guy said. There is too much of a hive-mind mentallity going on here. Just because movies always give you 100% happy endings doesn't mean a story as a great as Mass Effect will. The only thing I agree with in any of these discussions is that the Normandy crash scene was a little confusing, but aside from that it all makes sense.

Your decisions DID matter. Why do you think you deserve 57 different endings for every little detail you changed? You saw the effect of your choices THROUGHOUT EACH GAME.

No, you don't get to build a home with Tali or whoever you chose - you fought a damn war against almost invincible machines and had to use an alien super-weapon to stop them. IT'S NOT GONNA BE THAT HAPPY. 

Stop whining. Cool off. Walk outside, take a breath of fresh air and reflect on the story you've experienced and the characters you've learned to love. It's not totally over, anyway. Just Shepard.


It must be very reassuring knowing that your opinions are always the reasonable ones and everyone who disagrees with you is just 'whining.' I'm sure that'll get you far.


That's the way it looks. You don't get the present you want for christmas so you stand around and stomp, cross your arms and make mean faces until your parents do something about it. Except this is a mob of kids on christmas morning and they're all feeding off of each other like this is 4chan or something.

#71
DrDetective

DrDetective
  • Members
  • 271 messages
I don't care about the relays blowing up, or Shepard dying. The stupid space magic toddlergod is what ruined it all. A sad ending is fine. It's the fact that the ending makes no sense that pisses me off.

#72
Kloborgg711

Kloborgg711
  • Members
  • 833 messages

Paxcorpus wrote...

Tartilus wrote...

Paxcorpus wrote...

What this guy said. There is too much of a hive-mind mentallity going on here. Just because movies always give you 100% happy endings doesn't mean a story as a great as Mass Effect will. The only thing I agree with in any of these discussions is that the Normandy crash scene was a little confusing, but aside from that it all makes sense.

Your decisions DID matter. Why do you think you deserve 57 different endings for every little detail you changed? You saw the effect of your choices THROUGHOUT EACH GAME.

No, you don't get to build a home with Tali or whoever you chose - you fought a damn war against almost invincible machines and had to use an alien super-weapon to stop them. IT'S NOT GONNA BE THAT HAPPY. 

Stop whining. Cool off. Walk outside, take a breath of fresh air and reflect on the story you've experienced and the characters you've learned to love. It's not totally over, anyway. Just Shepard.


It must be very reassuring knowing that your opinions are always the reasonable ones and everyone who disagrees with you is just 'whining.' I'm sure that'll get you far.


That's the way it looks. You don't get the present you want for christmas so you stand around and stomp, cross your arms and make mean faces until your parents do something about it. Except this is a mob of kids on christmas morning and they're all feeding off of each other like this is 4chan or something.


Actually 99% of us are incredibly civil and just expressing our heartfelt reactions to a game series we love more than any other. There's no justification for your unwarranted insults.

And no, it was never a GIVEN that we would lose everything. Obviously it wasn't since most fans seem to be utterly shocked. As I've said before, the entirety of Mass Effect 3 is spent focusing on a hope-filled future. It doesn't "make sense" to leave every Quarian stranded right after finally giving closure to the Geth-Quarian war. What, pray tell, were the hints we all missed that led us to absolute oblivion?

Was it when I promised my LI that I would always come back? Was it when I promised Jacob I would join him in Rio? Was it when I told Garrus I'd meet him on the other side? Were those all foreshadowings that no matter what I do everything I love will be destroyed? No. Mass Effect, despite your insisted fantasy, was NEVER about a defeatist, fatalistic outcome. Every other game has you OVERCOMING impossible odds, not submitting to them.
So no, we're not whining. We're begging on our knees for a satisfactory, consistent ending to the story of characters we've spend years and hundreds of hours getting to know. And we have that right.

Modifié par Kloborgg711, 10 mars 2012 - 09:21 .


#73
Deztyn

Deztyn
  • Members
  • 885 messages

Paxcorpus wrote...

That's the way it looks. You don't get the present you want for christmas so you stand around and stomp, cross your arms and make mean faces until your parents do something about it. Except this is a mob of kids on christmas morning and they're all feeding off of each other like this is 4chan or something.


Fail analogy. ME3 wasn't a gift.  I paid over $200, and invested several hundred hours of my life for a product that ultimately disappointed me. I'll complain and commiserate as much as I like.

Modifié par Deztyn, 10 mars 2012 - 09:26 .


#74
JohnCena94

JohnCena94
  • Members
  • 158 messages

manwiththemachinegun wrote...

I know we're all still processing the ending. But I thought this dev comment gave me a lot of hope for the future of the Mass Effect universe (especially since people are screaming for Dev responses).

This is from the awesome, awesome dude who wrote a lot of Mordin's lines and ME3 sidequests.

Fan Question: A'ight, you don't have to answer this if you don't want too, but is every ending you losing? The one I read was the mass relays being destroyed or somesuch, I didn't dig too deep but it sounded like the reapers got rid of effective FTL travel.

Dev response: That's one way to look at it. Another way to look at it is that the galaxy is free from the specially limited technology that the Reapers have been using to guide evolution from time before memory.

My boss talks about Leningrad after WW2. A whole lotta dead people. A whole lotta buildings knocked down. The war really kicked the crap out of it.

I went to Saint Petersburg (aka Leningrad) back in 2004. It's a gorgeous city full of vibrant people, wonderful art, great food (and sure, crime, pollution, poverty, and all the bad stuff, too). From the end of the war, that's, what, 60 years?

A lot of planets are going to be looking like Leningrad at the end of ME3. That doesn't mean that they lost, and it doesn't mean that they've been destroyed forever.

There is light at the end of the tunnel folks. Image IPB

I call bull****, the galaxy cannot make them yet so many people will die waiting for supplies, not to mention he completly ignores that the mass relays should kill everyone.  Oh and the qurians, krogan, turians and everyone else will be stuck on Earth.  With out Shepard one could assume a massive war would break out for what few resources remained.  Before anyone says a damn thing about myassumption read the dev's responce and you can see how he assumed as well.

Modifié par JohnCena94, 10 mars 2012 - 09:32 .


#75
Militarized

Militarized
  • Members
  • 2 549 messages
I have to admit I do not have... as huge a problem with destroying the relays and citadels as others do. The Protheans unlocked the secret of the Relays. Why can't the entire galactic community?

Oh what's that you say? The Crucible scientists are trapped in a special/hidden system, the best and brightest of each civilization? So.... they're stuck there? Great.

The other problem with not having the ME relays is that even if they can do FTL travel in a reasonable time, the Relays negated the problem of running into ****. There are no star charts to navigate the galaxy with... you could potentially run into a star and be molten goo because you're blindly running straight at Thessia to provide logistical support(if they even bother because Earth is such a mess).