Aller au contenu

Photo

Connection between Endings and Galatic Readiness - Help? [Spoilers]


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
12 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Zhuinden

Zhuinden
  • Members
  • 2 480 messages

Rating < 1750 - Earth is destroyed regardless of your choice
Rating 1751-2050 - If Shepard destroys the Reapers, Earth is destroyed.
Rating 2051-2350 - If Shepard becomes a Reaper, Earth is saved.
Rating 2351-2650 - If Shepard destroys the Reapers, Earth is only devastated.
Rating 2651-2800 - If Shepard destroys the Reapers, Earth is saved.
Rating 2801-4000 - Shepard can create a synergy between organics and synthetics.
Rating 4000-5000 - If Shepard destroys the Reapers and "saves" Anderson, Shepard
will also live as Earth is saved.
Rating 5000+ - If Shepard destroys the Reapers and does not "save" Anderson,
Shepard will also live as Earth is saved.


This is what a guide on the internet says.
Now, my question is: if you have 6000 readiness, for example - then can you still get the synergy ending, or will you only be able to do the destroy ending?

#2
IronHam

IronHam
  • Members
  • 41 messages

Zhuinden wrote...

Rating < 1750 - Earth is destroyed regardless of your choice
Rating 1751-2050 - If Shepard destroys the Reapers, Earth is destroyed.
Rating 2051-2350 - If Shepard becomes a Reaper, Earth is saved.
Rating 2351-2650 - If Shepard destroys the Reapers, Earth is only devastated.
Rating 2651-2800 - If Shepard destroys the Reapers, Earth is saved.
Rating 2801-4000 - Shepard can create a synergy between organics and synthetics.
Rating 4000-5000 - If Shepard destroys the Reapers and "saves" Anderson, Shepard
will also live as Earth is saved.
Rating 5000+ - If Shepard destroys the Reapers and does not "save" Anderson,
Shepard will also live as Earth is saved.


This is what a guide on the internet says.
Now, my question is: if you have 6000 readiness, for example - then can you still get the synergy ending, or will you only be able to do the destroy ending?


You'll be able to do all the endings. The catalyst's perspective shifts depending on your actions throughout Mass Effect 3 (how much peace you accomplished) as represented by your warscore, thus opening new possibilities for it (the only new solution, synthesis. Note that control/destroy are not solutions to the catalyst's problem, the catalyst just realizes that it's cycle has been beaten, and it's solution is destroyed, as organics have managed to obtain technological superiority over the reapers with the crucible.)

#3
Zhuinden

Zhuinden
  • Members
  • 2 480 messages
Ah, that's good to hear.

#4
Cossack72

Cossack72
  • Members
  • 1 726 messages
And how does one "save" Anderson? Interrupt TIM from killing him or something else?

#5
Bfler

Bfler
  • Members
  • 2 991 messages
Does this mean that there is an ending with Shepard as survivor?

#6
Adamantium93

Adamantium93
  • Members
  • 1 171 messages

Bfler wrote...

Does this mean that there is an ending with Shepard as survivor?


Yeah. Its the same as the "destroy" ending except there's an extra scene that shows a burnt body holding N7 tags in the rubble and it takes a breath.

#7
Tapkomet

Tapkomet
  • Members
  • 515 messages
How do you save Anderson anyway? Anyone got a vid?

#8
Bfler

Bfler
  • Members
  • 2 991 messages

Adamantium93 wrote...

Bfler wrote...

Does this mean that there is an ending with Shepard as survivor?


Yeah. Its the same as the "destroy" ending except there's an extra scene that shows a burnt body holding N7 tags in the rubble and it takes a breath.


Hm, in my game the green bar with the allied troops is full and I don't have such an extra scene.
That would mean you need multiplayer for it and if I remember right someone of the developers has said that you don't need mp for the best end.

Modifié par Bfler, 10 mars 2012 - 10:32 .


#9
GBGriffin

GBGriffin
  • Members
  • 2 259 messages
I feel like a noob for asking this, but:

Do changes to the Readiness from multiplayer (the one that is default 50% if I'm getting the name wrong) carry over across multiple playthroughs, or should I only bother with multiplayer once I've settled on a single player campaign?

Modifié par GBGriffin, 10 mars 2012 - 10:32 .


#10
Darkov

Darkov
  • Members
  • 232 messages

Bfler wrote...

Adamantium93 wrote...

Bfler wrote...

Does this mean that there is an ending with Shepard as survivor?


Yeah. Its the same as the "destroy" ending except there's an extra scene that shows a burnt body holding N7 tags in the rubble and it takes a breath.


Hm, in my game the green bar with the allied troops is full and I don't have such an extra scene.
That would mean you need multiplayer for it and if I remember right someone of the developers has said that you don't need mp for the best end.


The green bar is only like 4000 war assets or something, you can have more assets than that and it recognises them beyond the green bar.

#11
Bfler

Bfler
  • Members
  • 2 991 messages

Darkov wrote...

Bfler wrote...

Adamantium93 wrote...

Bfler wrote...

Does this mean that there is an ending with Shepard as survivor?


Yeah. Its the same as the "destroy" ending except there's an extra scene that shows a burnt body holding N7 tags in the rubble and it takes a breath.


Hm, in my game the green bar with the allied troops is full and I don't have such an extra scene.
That would mean you need multiplayer for it and if I remember right someone of the developers has said that you don't need mp for the best end.


The green bar is only like 4000 war assets or something, you can have more assets than that and it recognises them beyond the green bar.



Yes, with all side quests and planet scans you can have around 7k but this is multiplied with 0.5 because of the readiness lvl. What means that you have to play MP to raise it above 4k

Modifié par Bfler, 10 mars 2012 - 10:52 .


#12
Eumerin

Eumerin
  • Members
  • 524 messages
From what I understand, "saving" Anderson merely means that he dies a few minutes later. You don't really save him. He just doesn't die as quickly.

I'm guessing that 75% of the people who didn't pick Destroy (including me, incidentally) for their ending would have picked Destroy if it hadn't taken the now friendly Geth and EDI as well. Shepard makes the choice that quite literally stabs one of his crewmembers in the back, and it's the "happy" ending because Shepard survived?

Is Bioware serious?

#13
Doronamo

Doronamo
  • Members
  • 53 messages

Eumerin wrote...

From what I understand, "saving" Anderson merely means that he dies a few minutes later. You don't really save him. He just doesn't die as quickly.

I'm guessing that 75% of the people who didn't pick Destroy (including me, incidentally) for their ending would have picked Destroy if it hadn't taken the now friendly Geth and EDI as well. Shepard makes the choice that quite literally stabs one of his crewmembers in the back, and it's the "happy" ending because Shepard survived?

Is Bioware serious?


I agree completely. I had chosen to control the Reapers because I did not want to lose EDI or the Geth, which I had chosen over the Quarians. I wasn't going to make the Quarian's sacrifice in vain.

But if we're destroying all synthetics, doesn't that mean that the people that rely on technology are going to be screwed? Like Shepard? If he lives after destroying all Synthetics... how is that possible?

Modifié par Doronamo, 10 mars 2012 - 11:03 .