Valo_Soren wrote...
Yes I have. I love the endings, I have played through Me 1 and 2 both seven bloody times, and I love the ending choices of Mass Effect 3. Try not to make any more general statements.
Modifié par Izhalezan, 11 mars 2012 - 12:11 .
Izhalezan wrote...
The ending left me confused and wondering if I really did just play a Mass Effect game... why did Harby have a 6 second cameo where he just zaps you and runs, why did the catalyst take the form of the kid that's been haunting your dreams, what proof is there that organics are destined to create synthetics that will destroy them........
The Angry One wrote...
Even with the proof of organics and synthetics learning to co-exist (Geth and Quarians) being literally RIGHT THERE. They alone disprove everything the idiot child says, so of course let's just ignore them!
Lexagg wrote...
To be fair, I kinda understand this. Have you ever tried arguing with kids? What was Shepard supposed to say?
Shepard: "You are wrong. I got organics and synthetics to coexist peacefully"
Guardin: "No I'm right"
Shepard: "No, you are wrong"
Guardian: "Right"
Shepard: "Wrong"
Guarding: "Nuh-huh"
Shepard: "Uh-huh"
Guardian: "Nuh-huh"
Shepard: "Screw this. DESTROY ENDING!"
JanakiLotus wrote...
I posted this somewhere else and I felt the need to post this here also. This is my response to someone who said the ending did not make sense in a derisive tone.
Actually the ending makes complete sense. Every single cycle is destroyed precisely because their technology was based on the Mass Relays. Sovereign says this itself. The reason every single choice you make(only chose to destroy Reaper and Synthetic will make different choice next runs) The Mass Relays being destroyed in all three endings makes sense because youre giving Organics something they havent had in MILLIONS of years; freedom to develop on their own path.
And getting some picture and text explanation of your squadmates and galaxy would contradict that. How can a future be provided for you the player, when the whole entire point of all three games was fighting against a future imposed on you for evolving?
Meeting the Catalyst makes sense also because the Catalyst is a Boltzmann Brain. A self realized entity the manifests from a state of chaos. Which the Catalyst and Reapers have been doing for countless cycles. Imposing order on the chaos out of an act of self-preservation. Only ONE existed when others could have if Organic and Synthetic life could flourish and reach some equilibrium on its own, or evolve to a consciousness of a higher order of the AIs own level.
That is why the ending is beautiful and doesn`t need to be changed. It is perfect.
JanakiLotus wrote...
I posted this somewhere else and I felt the need to post this here also. This is my response to someone who said the ending did not make sense in a derisive tone.
Actually the ending makes complete sense. Every single cycle is destroyed precisely because their technology was based on the Mass Relays. Sovereign says this itself. The reason every single choice you make(only chose to destroy Reaper and Synthetic will make different choice next runs) The Mass Relays being destroyed in all three endings makes sense because youre giving Organics something they havent had in MILLIONS of years; freedom to develop on their own path.
And getting some picture and text explanation of your squadmates and galaxy would contradict that. How can a future be provided for you the player, when the whole entire point of all three games was fighting against a future imposed on you for evolving?
Meeting the Catalyst makes sense also because the Catalyst is a Boltzmann Brain. A self realized entity the manifests from a state of chaos. Which the Catalyst and Reapers have been doing for countless cycles. Imposing order on the chaos out of an act of self-preservation. Only ONE existed when others could have if Organic and Synthetic life could flourish and reach some equilibrium on its own, or evolve to a consciousness of a higher order of the AIs own level.
That is why the ending is beautiful and doesn`t need to be changed. It is perfect.
Lexagg wrote...
Valo_Soren wrote...
Yes I have. I love the endings, I have played through Me 1 and 2 both seven bloody times, and I love the ending choices of Mass Effect 3. Try not to make any more general statements.
No you don't. You don't give a damn about ME story, you just like it for the pew pew.
Guest_ShadowJ20_*
Dr_Hello wrote...
However they could do well by adding at least 1 which would reward the particular players who excelled in the 3 games based on paragon points, right decisions, max. war assets and even perhaps completion of games at high diffilcutly levels. As Legion or EDI would say, "It's only logical to do so".
Modifié par ShadowJ20, 11 mars 2012 - 12:42 .
DthJk34 wrote...
Also if they add an ending that allows you to keep the relays it ruins the power of having to make the decision to destroy them, the inevitability of it. In fact I loved that twist at the end, even if the ending could use some more polish, and removing it ruins the trilogy.
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Lol this guy...Lexagg wrote...
Valo_Soren wrote...
Yes I have. I love the endings, I have played through Me 1 and 2 both seven bloody times, and I love the ending choices of Mass Effect 3. Try not to make any more general statements.
No you don't. You don't give a damn about ME story, you just like it for the pew pew.
Retour en haut