1. The Reapers were being taken out left and right. At one point Shepard uses a Heavy Weapon from mass effect 2 that couldn't kill the Shadow Broker. This makes no sense with the ending for two reasons.
1.) In the history of ME two have been taken down before (from what can be gathered), I understand Soverign was adavanced and more powerful ,so I see the other sides view but that brings me to this 2.) If it is that easy to take the majorty of them down why can't a galatic sized fleet take the reapers in a fight.
2. Where are the Elcor, Drell, Batarians, the gangs, and the other half of my allies at? Did they miss the call?
3. The child, I can see why some people would not mind, but the argument the kid presents is terrible. He basically says that the reapers destroy organic life to protect it from synthetics. The same reapers, who are more machine than anything. Beyond this the crucible making no sense all fall under this point.
4. The Normandy leaving. Some say it was retreating. The same Normandy that fought Soverign and took on the Collector Homeworld is running away from a fight?
5. The ending basically screws over the entire crew of the Normandy.
6. If the mass relays are destroyed so to should the galaxy (Based off the arrival DLC)
7. What happend to getting the ending you want?
5 granted is personal, and six is a matter of opinon , but I do not really see how any of the rest of could be argued as making a "good" or senseable ending.
So why do you hate Mass Effect 3's endings? If you don't then why not start a thread in their defence?
Modifié par JohnCena94, 10 mars 2012 - 09:17 .





Retour en haut






