Its all wrong, machines do not need organics to survive when they are advanced like the reapers. They would have no reason to let organics evolve anyway. If organics where a threat, why would the reapers give us 50000 years to evolve in the first place. The end has to do with the reapers harvesting organics for their own survival only!!!
That is why I hate the way EDI evolves because I know a machines cannot feel anything unless it would be programmed for it and it would defiantly not choose evolve morally because its survival would be compromised and they are not curious either .
The geth were also a mistake, they evolved backwards in sense. They geth where basically a perfect democracy and now each geth platform has its own free will which is actually bad from them because they endanger themselves.
The geth would have never choosen this for there own survival by free will and legion is no different because he is the same only his software is all on his unique platform.(it was legions idea)
Mass Effect 3 Reaper ending problem
Débuté par
dave1904
, mars 10 2012 10:02
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 10:05
John Locke N7
-
- Members
- 856 messages
EDI has the ability to program herself, just like humans. so her evolution was awesome.
as for the reapers waiting every 50k years? well they did it for reasons that were scrapped at the beggining of ME3 so..... theres that
as for the reapers waiting every 50k years? well they did it for reasons that were scrapped at the beggining of ME3 so..... theres that
#3
Posté 10 mars 2012 - 10:08
dave1904
-
- Members
- 18 messages
Just cause she can doesnt mean she would any reason what so ever to do itJohn Locke N7 wrote...
EDI has the ability to program herself, just like humans. so her evolution was awesome.
as for the reapers waiting every 50k years? well they did it for reasons that were scrapped at the beggining of ME3 so..... theres that
