216 réponses à ce sujet

[Patriota125]

vigna wrote...

Patriota125 wrote...

It's realistic because theres no way we couldve win this war without making huge sacrifices.

Most people here are allowing for the fact that Shephard and allies could die, and they wouldn't be mad.....that's not most people's issue with the endings...ugghhh

B.i.tch please, theyr BlTCHlNG because they wanted Shepard to live and something with LI.

[AtreiyaN7]

The thread tile alone is likely to get this shut down, but I do think the endings make sense in context of the story and the themes from all three games. I blogged about it, so if you want my detailed reasoning about it all, go read it. I've written too many walls of text today as it is.

[Spaceguy5]

Patriota125 wrote...

It's realistic because theres no way we couldve win this war without making huge sacrifices.

Fallacy.

While you could say "It's a very intense war, there's no way we could have won without making a huge sacrifice" that does not imply that said 'huge sacrifice' has to be a crazy, illogical, nonsensical sacrifice.

I see no logical way that magical space plasma could instantly change every living thing in the galaxy (not to mention that at the rate that wave was moving, it would take billions of years to reach everyone).

Plus, why the heck was the Normandy going through a mass relay when it happened? Seriously. There's no reason for that what so ever.

[Lexagg]

Grumpy Midget wrote...

Please stop feeding the troll

But that would hurt his feelings.

[Patriota125]

Lexagg wrote...

Patriota125 wrote...

Whatever kiddie I dont care if you think youre mature or something, go pretend  youre grown up somewhere else.

Ooooh, "mature" talk again. Please, keep going.

"look im so cool and mature and I can troll this guy"

lol youre so funny

[Eterna]

Patriota125 wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

Patriota125 wrote...

"oh im so cool and its a complete rip off of deus ex, yeah men"

No.

The ending is REALISTIC to the series. That's all.

 How can you expect them to respect your opinion when you crap all over theirs? 

Because their opinion is stupid.

 No it isn't. I don't agree with them but it's not stupid. 

[vigna]

Patriota125 wrote...

vigna wrote...

Patriota125 wrote...

It's realistic because theres no way we couldve win this war without making huge sacrifices.

Most people here are allowing for the fact that Shephard and allies could die, and they wouldn't be mad.....that's not most people's issue with the endings...ugghhh

B.i.tch please, theyr BlTCHlNG because they wanted Shepard to live and something with LI.

Some yes....some no.   no more food for you..

[SaltyWaffles-PD]

According to the OP, "Realistic" is:

1) The Normandy, which is near Earth's surface, somehow made it to the Mass Relay before the Crucible fired, knew to do so (even though 2 of the 3 endings would have been totally fine for it), and actually abandoned the most important battle in history at a critical point.

2) The Normandy, travelling at mass relay FTL speeds gets hit by an even faster "shockwave" full of energy, starts to violently shake and break up while at FTL speeds...and then somehow ends up on a completely habitable world mostly intact, with no serious injures. What.

3) The Synthesis ending: so this "wave of energy" changes DNA to INSTANTLY create huge amounts of glowing synthetic components inside the skin of organic people? And does nothing to synthetic life, despite being supposed to (EDI looks no different). And how does changing DNA make an organic being more synthetic? Without killing them, no less? How would it know HOW to do so for EVERY species in the galaxy, and every person?

4) The Catalyst controls the Reapers, but can't just kill them himself?

5) Why didn't the Catalyst just use the Synthesis option himself? He's had thousands of years to construct the Crucible, and knew how. All he needed was a single organic...

6) Why would using the Crucible destroy the relay network, yet leave the Citadel intact?

7) In the Destroy ending, how is all advanced technology destroyed without killing organics? Even some super-EMP wave would be lethal to humans if it's powerful enough to span huge chunks of the galaxy in seconds...

[Nefelius]

This is in no way realistic just because u work so hard proving unknowingly this SOB VI kid is wrong, and then all of a sudden you submit to the whole "synthetics will always wage war on organics" idiocy.

[GuyWithFace]

So much feeding of trolls. I thought these guys were obvious to everyone by now.

[Mr. Big Pimpin]

Gotta hand it to the OP; he trolled some of you pretty well.

[SaltyWaffles-PD]

Oh, and can one of the devs or moderators lock this thread for having a homophobic slur (in both spelling and usage) in the TITLE?

[kramerfan86]

Yup Joker and the squadmaters running away from the battle definitely is true to the series and realistic, I mean the squadmates and joker are pretty clear cowards from day one.

[Lexagg]

Patriota125 wrote...

"look im so cool and mature and I can troll this guy"

lol youre so funny

You can do better than repeating my own insults. Can you maybe at least call me "fat loser who lives in his moms basement" or something? I could troll better than this when I was 13, and I didn't even have internet.

[Notho]

Do not feed the troll. Thanks.

[hector7rau]

[deathscythe517]

Eterna5 wrote...

Patriota125 wrote...

"oh im so cool and its a complete rip off of deus ex, yeah men"

No.

The ending is REALISTIC to the series. That's all.

 How can you expect them to respect your opinion when you crap all over theirs? 

For once we're in agreement, my advice to everyone? Report the hell out of him and quit responding to him.

[Pandaman102]

The availability of endings only take two things in consideration: the Collector Base status and your Effective Military Strength. The problem is the former only influences the EMS threshold, but if you gather every war asset available - regardless of what you do in ME1 and ME2 - you'll be able to unlock all endings a their best possible result regardless.

So, simply put: the endings are disappointing in that they reduce your choices in ME1 and ME2 to cameos and side missions. That's hardly what was expected from the promises given over the years of this franchise.

That being said, I would like to turn your attention to that little announcement you seem to have failed to read before posting this "mature" opinion you hold, as well as your repeated, beligerant replies. More specifically: "Anyone posting a personal attack on staff, moderators or other Community members will, at the sole discretion of staff or moderators, be banned from the BioWare Social Network without notice and is no longer welcomed. "

Hope they fixed that whole "banned from forum equals banned from game" bug.

[Stokie Stallion]

best thread title ever

[KainrycKarr]

Patriota125 wrote...

"oh im so cool and its a complete rip off of deus ex, yeah men"

No.

The ending is REALISTIC to the series. That's all.

Why did Sovereign need to open the citadel if the citadel was IN CONTROL OF THE REAPERS?

Why was the Normandy way off, by itself, with the squadmates you took with you to EARTH THAT MAGICALLY TELEPORTED, by the relay?

Why did the kid NOT mention that the relay energy opens up wormholes that suck in ships and spit them out on random locations?

Why did I see Liara in my flashback instead of Tali, my LI?

Why was there no text-based epilogue detailing the consequences of my actions and the state I left the galaxy in?

Oh, and the kid is space wizard. Yup. Very realistic.

[Drake_1000]

Notho wrote...

Do not feed the troll. Thanks.

Same here.
You make him happy.

[Lexagg]

Looks like he gave up =( Now I'm bored again.

[Patriota125]

KainrycKarr wrote...




Why did Sovereign need to open the citadel if the citadel was IN CONTROL OF THE REAPERS?

Why was the Normandy way off, by itself, with the squadmates you took with you to EARTH THAT MAGICALLY TELEPORTED, by the relay?

Why did the kid NOT mention that the relay energy opens up wormholes that suck in ships and spit them out on random locations?

Why did I see Liara in my flashback instead of Tali, my LI?

Why was there no text-based epilogue detailing the consequences of my actions and the state I left the galaxy in?

Oh, and the kid is space wizard. Yup. Very realistic.

Play the whole series again, you dont even have a clue.

[Greed1914]

Lexagg wrote...

Patriota125 wrote...

"oh im so cool and its a complete rip off of deus ex, yeah men"

No.

The ending is REALISTIC to the series. That's all.

Oh the irony, someone claiming to be "mature" yet throwing homophobic slurs. This looks like a typical example of a "mature" "love the ending" group. Basically proves everything I've been saying so far.

Just what I thought.  The title alone ruins any ounce of credibility.

[Archereon]

Spaceguy5 wrote...

Patriota125 wrote...

It's realistic because theres no way we couldve win this war without making huge sacrifices.

Fallacy.

While you could say "It's a very intense war, there's no way we could have won without making a huge sacrifice" that does not imply that said 'huge sacrifice' has to be a crazy, illogical, nonsensical sacrifice.

I see no logical way that magical space plasma could instantly change every living thing in the galaxy (not to mention that at the rate that wave was moving, it would take billions of years to reach everyone).

Plus, why the heck was the Normandy going through a mass relay when it happened? Seriously. There's no reason for that what so ever.

There's no way we could've won the war period without a device that generates a Deus Ex Machina. Earth versus Reapers in Mass Effect went about as well as Earth versus Combine in half life; it took them about an hour to destroy most of the Alliance's assets on Earth.