But don't exploding Mass Relays wipe out entire star systems?
#1
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:30
#2
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:31
Watch for it. Here they come!
#3
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:31
#4
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:32
#5
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:34
#6
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:35
#7
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:36
QuarianHIV wrote...
BW's deploying their usual propaganda scrubs to tell everyone that the relays didn't 'explode'.
Watch for it. Here they come!
boy you called it LOL
#8
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:37
On the other hand, the ME3 was a more controlled explosion and many of the fragments were consumed in the explosion radius before they went flying off so not an impossible guess that there was much less damage than Arrival would suggest.
#9
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:42
The goal of the endings that we have (I don't like them, but if the goal anyhow) is to ensure that whatever civilization can "survive" after the endings will have to find "their own way" over time (thousands of years surely). If, or whenever space travel becomes wide spread again one day then it won't have been done via the mass relays even if they are still physically there, but done via a way that one or more civilizations will fabric on their own, perhaps another network, perhaps a mimic of the relays network, but made out of a technology created by the civilizations themselves, and not the Reapers.
That's how I see it anyway. But I repeat, I don't like it anyhow, but given what we have then that's what I understand of it.
#10
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:45
Had I not seen that scene, then I would have thought the same as you because the blast wave trashes the Normandy.
Modifié par raeting, 11 mars 2012 - 03:46 .
#11
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:47
Lyrandori wrote...
To be honest I don't think that the Mass Relays exploded, I think that they have been deactivated permanently, or made "inert". The energy we see traveling around the galaxy via the relays network I believe is just that, the energy that passes through the whole network to disable it, but the physical relays themselves remain where they are, they just turn off perhaps forever.
The goal of the endings that we have (I don't like them, but if the goal anyhow) is to ensure that whatever civilization can "survive" after the endings will have to find "their own way" over time (thousands of years surely). If, or whenever space travel becomes wide spread again one day then it won't have been done via the mass relays even if they are still physically there, but done via a way that one or more civilizations will fabric on their own, perhaps another network, perhaps a mimic of the relays network, but made out of a technology created by the civilizations themselves, and not the Reapers.
That's how I see it anyway. But I repeat, I don't like it anyhow, but given what we have then that's what I understand of it.
You may want to re-watch the ending. With the pieces of relay flying every which way, followed by what certainly LOOKS like an explosive energy burst, I call that an explosion. I guess you could refer to it as being 'rendered inert in the most violent way imaginable' instead, though.
#12
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:50
Uh, what? Pieces of the Charon relay clearly explode. Its rings stop spinning, and they go flying off into space shortly after.Lyrandori wrote...
To be honest I don't think that the Mass Relays exploded, I think that they have been deactivated permanently, or made "inert". The energy we see traveling around the galaxy via the relays network I believe is just that, the energy that passes through the whole network to disable it, but the physical relays themselves remain where they are, they just turn off perhaps forever.
I could see you saying the Citadel may not actually explode, but the relay? We clearly see it get blown apart. There's no indication that the same isn't true for all the other relays.
That said, the inconsistency can be handwaved away as a difference between crashing a small planetoid into an active relay and whatever method was used to destroy all the relays in the end.
Modifié par devSin, 11 mars 2012 - 03:51 .
#13
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:51
#14
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:51
#15
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:52
Of my many problems with the ending (the destruction of the infrastructure represented by the Relays among them), this was not actually one of them.
#16
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:54
Biotic Sage wrote...
Deactivating the relays through the Crucible seems far different than ramming an asteroid in it to me. Not once did I think it was going to be a repeat of the Batarian system in "Arrival" when I was playing through the ending. People will look for every little window of opportunity to criticize.
Dude, I clearly did not buy TWO copies of this game, one for myself and one for my son, so I could bounce about on some forum and find things to nit-pick about. Quite characterizing people who disagree with you in a negative light - I haven't done it to you.
#17
Guest_Chvywolf_*
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:56
Guest_Chvywolf_*
eye basher wrote...
they didn't explode they relesed an energy wave desiged to destroy anything with reaper tech.
And the tail end of SSV Normandy’s. Not to mention pieces flying off in random directions due to the release of said energy. I believe that's called an explosion.
#18
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 03:58
Now, the problem is... if the relays exploded and each of them destroyed the star system they were located in... then it means that a lot of systems (thousands?) in the galaxy were destroyed, including Sol, therefore including Earth (hug... what a horrible ending). Now, the galaxy is big, there's millions of other systems in which there might have been zero relays, always isolated from the network that we don't know of. From those systems then maybe some civilizations will continue to flourish happily ever after... let's hope.
#19
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 04:01
Like someone said up top the excuse is that God-Child "Destroyed" them in such a fashion that they didn't wipe out all life.
And yes "destroyed" is confirmed for those of you "How do you know they were destroyed?" Because it was confirmed that the destruction of the Mass Relays "freed" organics from Reaper control. Basically my toy, and i'm bringing it home.
#20
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 04:02
Lyrandori wrote...
Ooooh, my bad lol, I forgot about that mass relay exploding, it was the Charon relay then? I see, yeah thing is the ending depressed me so much that I refused to look at it again since I completed the game about two days ago, I forgot completely about that part. Well, they exploded then... that's bad. But in any case really, explosions or not, the goal is to ensure that civilizations find their own way.
Now, the problem is... if the relays exploded and each of them destroyed the star system they were located in... then it means that a lot of systems (thousands?) in the galaxy were destroyed, including Sol, therefore including Earth (hug... what a horrible ending). Now, the galaxy is big, there's millions of other systems in which there might have been zero relays, always isolated from the network that we don't know of. From those systems then maybe some civilizations will continue to flourish happily ever after... let's hope.
But then, how do they know of Shepard? If they weren't advanced enough to have a stake in the battle against the Reapers, and were removed enough from the center of the Galaxy not to witness the battle, how do they know Shepard ended it? (as expressed in the "Stargazer" epilogue)
#21
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 04:18
#22
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 04:32
#23
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 04:34
That's the only logical way to explain this if it is a plot hole. When we destroyed the other relay we did it unconventionally with an Asteroid.





Retour en haut







