Why is the Catalyst the Kid from Earth?
#1
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:43
And what does that mean about the Kid from Earth?
I think Bioware dropped the ball pretty hard at the end...
#2
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:45
#3
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:45
#4
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:46
#5
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:46
#6
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:47
Modifié par Ebannaw1, 11 mars 2012 - 06:49 .
#7
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:47
The most pivotal plot point 3 whole games hinges on and they took a hot steaming pile of poop on the franchise.
The kid made no sense. What he said made no sense. my Sheperd would never agreed to any of the 3 options, because none of the options make sense, you never use the crucible.
It was just overall a herpity derpity that went to 11.
Even Metal Gear Solid games make more sense.
#8
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:48
As for why that god was in the form of some random child from Earth, I'm not sure. It certainly was him, because there's no denying that the damn thing was wearing a hoodie. Perhaps the way an organic perceives that being is relative to their experiences and the visions that may exist within their mind. I don't know. I'm just pulling that out of nowhere because there's no actual explanation.
EDIT: lolol was
Modifié par taylortexas, 11 mars 2012 - 06:48 .
#9
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:49
Maybe the kid is supposed to be a psychological play on the part of the catalyst to manipulate Shepard. The main problem with this is that every Shepard will react to the child differently. This exposes a less talked about issue with the game: the dream sequences where your reactions to the child are completely out of your control. My Shep doesn't give a rat's ass about that random kid she saw for 30 seconds. Haunt me with Mordin, haunt me with Tali, with Legion, with Ashley, but my god some random goddamn kid?
Modifié par aimlessgun, 11 mars 2012 - 06:52 .
#10
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:50
#11
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:51
#12
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:51
#13
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:51
#14
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:51
#15
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:53
As others have stated, the Reapers' entire system of indoctrination indicates that they've (and presumably the God-Child too) got some way to engage with your mind.Unender wrote...
Legion only was able to make things familiar because he was plugged into directly into Shepard's brain, the catalyst was not. Thus the conclusion that it's an extension of that makes zero sense.
#16
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:54
this is sci fi 101 not a hard concept people
#17
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:54
Der Estr Bune wrote...
The hallucination theories handle that pretty well, by representing him as a weighty piece of Shepard's psyche manifesting itself. Outside of those, you could take it as a continuation of Legion's level (where the system wants to present Shepard with images s/he'll understand and be able to make sense of), or (a new theory I'm working on), you could assume that the boy was the Catalyst the whole time.
I'd say either one works. The second one you mentioned is probably what it is supposed to be. The Catalyst takes some form that is relatable. Of course, the fact that only Shepard ever sees the boy does play into how it's the first real sign of some sort of indoctrination.
#18
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:55
VerdantSF wrote...
Because it's an indoctrination attempt by the Catalyst, using Shepard's memories and guilt to sway him.
you make more sense than mass effect 3
#19
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 06:57
"One child would be the face of the people on Earth whom Shepard could not save."
He's nothing more and nothing less than that. It can be assumed that the Guardian/Catalyst/whatever took that form to appease to Shepard's subconscious as something that held meaning to him, while not being too personal.
Edit: A link of the quote.
Leafs43 wrote...
Even Metal Gear Solid games make more sense.
And that's saying a lot. (I loved the MGS games, btw.)
Modifié par GuyWithFace, 11 mars 2012 - 07:03 .
#20
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 07:10
I started thinking that, but then realized it might be a long shot.
Maybe Shepard's lost his mind some, after some of the things he/she has endured.
I noticed in the end, the whole thing's really always been about Shepard, his/her decisions, and his/her fate.
Modifié par Mole267, 11 mars 2012 - 07:15 .
#21
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 07:11
#22
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 07:12
Of course it wasn't, because that would've been in danger of making sense.
#23
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 07:18
That's the theory I believe. Alternatively it could just be a case of poor writing.
#24
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 07:22
If it were a guilt attempt, why wasn't there any mention of that guilt? Not seein' it...
#25
Posté 11 mars 2012 - 07:23
And it sucked balls partially because of that.





Retour en haut







