Aller au contenu

Photo

Which tech does the 'Destroy' ending destroy?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
10 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Cimeas

Cimeas
  • Members
  • 774 messages
 Is it just the mass relays, or FTL/ the communicators/spaceships?  Someone said its all those things, but I thought it was just the endings?  I guess it doesn't matter if Mass Effect isn't continuing, but if anyone knows (and please, if you don't know/they didn't say, dont turn this into and endings rant) that would be great. 

#2
Fjordgnu

Fjordgnu
  • Members
  • 267 messages
This is the main reason the Destroy ending makes no sense, it seems to me. Where is the line drawn between organic and synthetic life, or non-life? It's not answered, and it seems like a pretty important question.

#3
I can Hackett

I can Hackett
  • Members
  • 698 messages
im curious about this as well was it everything from the geth to simple ipod or just advanced stuff

#4
Mahrac

Mahrac
  • Members
  • 2 624 messages
I'm pretty sure the god manchild says it destroys all reaper tech. I don't know if that means everythig the reapers built or all mass effect technology though

#5
Penguins

Penguins
  • Members
  • 152 messages
Who knows. We only know that in the ending, spaceflight is either impossible or extremely limited. [Relays gone, and by the time Stargazer is around fuel may be used up for FTL, or ships are now defunct.]

It also destroys EDI, and destroys the geth. But somehow Shepard can survive, so... /headhold

#6
Kmead15

Kmead15
  • Members
  • 515 messages
"synthetic life, including the geth." Also the mass relays, as in all endings.

#7
Greed1914

Greed1914
  • Members
  • 2 638 messages
Yeah, another case of where, at a minimum, the logic is flawed in the end. The Catalyst flat out says that the destroyed technology includes Shepard's implants. As in the things that brought him back to life, and yet that is the only option where Shepard lives. What? You just told me that said option would probably kill me, and then I find out that it's actually the only one that doesn't.

#8
Arthorius

Arthorius
  • Members
  • 528 messages
All reaper-based tech it seems. Mass effect fields included.

How? Space magic. Don't ask.

#9
Atraiyu Wrynn

Atraiyu Wrynn
  • Members
  • 415 messages
They say it will also destroy "much" of the technology that people rely on, going as far as to point out that Shepard is partially synthetic. So good luck getting medical attention after surviving the destroy ending.

#10
DocturKnowles

DocturKnowles
  • Members
  • 5 messages
I quote, "I know you've thought about destroying us. You can wipe out all synthetic life if you want; including the Geth AND MOST OF THE TECHNOLOGY YOU RELY ON. Even you are partly synthetic."

So basically, anything derived from Protheans, Reapers, etc.

#11
AlloutAce

AlloutAce
  • Members
  • 73 messages
I think the mass relays and other major technologies, saying that all mass effect tech belongs to the reapers is like saying Nuclear weapons are only for Americans. Mass effect, eezo and all that other jazz is a law of physics (in the game) the reapers simply manipulated it. The reaper tech would be things, they created and left behind like the citadel and mass relays. Not something that uses the same principled but is completely different. For example, every assault rifle is a mass accelerator, they werent destroyed in the cutscene when the wave passed over the marines. I'm not sure what exactly the wave did to the Normandy though, so my theory may be completely void.