Aulis Vaara wrote...
LinksOcarina wrote...
What did he add to the table other than more layers to the Prothean Lore?
Another important biotic squadmate.LinksOcarina wrote...
It just sounds better with him there.
It doesn't "just" sound better. It sounds so much better that it was obvious he was supposed to be there. And without him, it sounds like something is seriously missing there. I was happy to go through the game without him, but when I got there, it pissed me off all over again.LinksOcarina wrote...
Javik is not integral to the plot of Mass Effect 3, but he is integral to the lore of Mass Effect 3.
He is important to both. Or is the fact that we are only fighting this war because of the Protheans suddenly irrelevant? Is it not so that we are fighting this war as much for them as for every other species still alive. Are we not trying to make them proud? Making their sacrifices worthwhile?LinksOcarina wrote...
As for Garrus, he is vital to the story by virtue of the fact of being involved in the story. His arc; becoming a leader under the tutalege of Shepard, concludes in 3 after taking a turn in 2. Garrus comes full circle and finally has responsabilites and makes decisions on his own without second guessing them. He is also part of the story because he is involved in the main plot, albiet indirectly as one of the few Turians who was working to help his kind be prepared for the Reapers. So Garrus is the opposite of Javik, he brings little to the Turian lore, but he is important to the story because of the comraderie with Shepard and his arc as a character.
How is Javik not "involved in the story" ? How is Garrus' character arc any more important than that of Javik? How does Javik not come full circle for fighting and defeating the enemy he was born to fight and defeat, avenging his entire species in the process? How does Javik not have a unique relationship with Shepard, much different from Garrus' but no less important?
1) A game mechanic that means little. Liara is the only definite biotic you have, and she is really all you needed. Its a nice bonus to have a second biotic, but its not necessary, like Sebastian in Dragon Age II being a second archer.
2) I guess it affected me differently, I played both sides of that with and without him, it was cooler with him id admit, but he was still unecessary to the scene overall.
3) Shepard is not fighting for the Protheans, he is fighting for Earth. The Protheans may have saved him in game one, but since then he has been on his own doing the dirty work against the Reapers. So yeah, it is irrelevent because they already did their part in game one. They only come back because of the Crucible in game three, and even then its not a design they made as we found out from the catalyst anyway.
There is no reason to make them proud because they are dead. You can honor the sacrifice, but Shepard already did that because the Protheans bought them some time. And we need to keep in mind Javik was not a part of that group at all, ergo he offers nothing useful to the plot that can save them. Javik as a character, as a prothean, did nothing to help Shepard, its John Doe the Prothean, the guy who programmed Vigil, that deserves the credit.
4) You got me there, he does go through growth. But one thing that is very apparent is that he changes little when compared to Garrus. Javik comes to respect what Shepard does as a leader, despite disagreeing with a lot of what Shepard can do. Javik comes full circle because he believes these primitive species deserve the right to try to win. He doesn't think they will win, he never states that in the game until one specific moment towards the end.
And Garrus is more important because he has three games of growth to go through, whereas Javik has one. Its cold, hard math really; Garrus had a planned arc that peaks, decends, and he learns from it, and Garrus' arc is mostly due to the struggles of the plotline, not the games lore. Javiks arc involves his direct connection to his previous beliefs, the lore of the Protheans. He learns from Shepard yes, and begins to let go some of his edge, but it is always within the context of what his people should do. "In my cycle" is a common phrase, and is very appropriate because he discusses the past history of his people, and it colors his judgements in the present.
Modifié par LinksOcarina, 16 mars 2012 - 04:12 .





Retour en haut






