135 réponses à ce sujet

[Harbinger of Hope]

Taleroth wrote...

Because causing the genocide of billions of innocents as collateral damage is unacceptable when there is another way.

+1. My headcanon for it is once my Shep had control, he flew the entire reaper fleet into a black hole.

[Madkipz]

Tsantilas wrote...

I picked synthesis because destroying the Geth and EDI after all Shepard went through is complete bull****. It is the obvious choice for those that sided with the Quarians against the Geth though.

Except the Godchild thing tells you that you are partly synthetic. So why are you alive if you picked the destroy ending?

[VinWizzy]

Well after I decided to destroy and when I did, I felt bad because the Geth were killed as well as EDI. There sacrifice will not be forgotten.

[kevchy]

I chose synthesis. I did not want Legion to sacrifice himself for nothing.

[d-boy15]

I don't know the scene doesn't even show that Geth are destroy

Beside, are you trust every word from the hologram kid that claim to be Reaper boss?

[Ieldra]

Painaid wrote...
Because I refuse to cause the Genocide of the Geth who I just redeemed in the eyes of Galactic civilization and EDI who has shown through her conversation to possess empathy for life and its struggles.

This.

[Lexander53]

I would of chosen Destroy in a heartbeat if it didn't mean the end of the Geth and EDI who are the prime examples that Synthetics can co-exist with organics.

Destroy does follow the ideal that I think (My) Shepard would of followed, that we would find our own way and we do not to be reliant on technology that you left for us to develop under.

But because killing the Geth and EDI were placed on destroy I couldn't do it... so I chose synthesis. I don't agree with it 100% but it does go along with the effect that "I'm going to forge a new path."

[phimseto]

MerchantGOL wrote...

"With Control, you're just being a fool like the Illusive Man. No good can come from all that power."

shepard isn't as dumb as T.I.M and even a renegade will know when to stop

Your words right there have me starting to believe that there really is something to this indoctrinatieon/false ending theory. That's always where it starts: that you know better and you can handle it where others can't.

And synthesis is a vile choice. Shame on all you little eugenics freaks out there.

Modifié par phimseto, 12 mars 2012 - 03:58 .

[Oshunsar]

Anyone is able to rewrite the Geth (happened before) and even EDI if you carefully listen to her at the Normandy and on Shoreleave.
You miss something? Rebuild them / her - the plans are there.
They are different then? That is what life is doing with your DNA also!
Destroy is obvious and isnt against "morale" it just doesnt feel right.
Saving a Rachni Queen AGAIN is right, killing her is genocide, not destroing machines.

Come on be real: Me and my tribe first... its the same like anytime since climbing down the trees...

[statistx]

i wasn't able to broker peace between quarians and geth, so the geth were out of the picture allready, cause letting Legion upload and then getting all quarians including tali killed, plus Legion dies in the attack, was no option for me, so it was bye bye legion for me long before the end.

[TobiTobsen]

Madkipz wrote...

Tsantilas wrote...

I picked synthesis because destroying the Geth and EDI after all Shepard went through is complete bull****. It is the obvious choice for those that sided with the Quarians against the Geth though.

Except the Godchild thing tells you that you are partly synthetic. So why are you alive if you picked the destroy ending?

Exactly. The godchild is talking ****.