When has Microsoft ever let players play online with a free/silver account? >.>AfflictionODP wrote...
I didn't play the demo. Well, that's about the most f***ed up thing I've heard today!
An Xbox LIVE privilege limitation prevents you from accessing this feature
#26
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 10:28
#27
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 10:29
What it Dookie wrote...
Xbox Live will be free to play July 1st, if you want to hold out for that long.
#28
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 10:32
DarkSpider88 wrote...
What it Dookie wrote...
Xbox Live will be free to play July 1st, if you want to hold out for that long.Reallly... do you have a soure?
Check the previous page...
#29
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 10:33
#30
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 10:38
Aaperture wrote...
What PC gamers don't realize is that they paid 3 times or more for their unstable gaming rig.
I laugh my ass off when you try to compare prices, are way off, and don't even bother to include the fact that you are paying for internet TWICE on your "stable" (ahahahahaha) gaming rig.
#31
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:14
LostMem0ry wrote...
Well since my PC hasn't had any magic yellow or red lights of death, I would consider it more stable than any console.Aaperture wrote...
What PC gamers don't realize is that they paid 3 times or more for their unstable gaming rig.
PC Multiplayer games consistently have the worst issues and glitches.
#32
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:19
Actually, I am way off. It's more like 5 times the price of an xbox, usually more.Blackest_Knight wrote...
Aaperture wrote...
What PC gamers don't realize is that they paid 3 times or more for their unstable gaming rig.
I laugh my ass off when you try to compare prices, are way off, and don't even bother to include the fact that you are paying for internet TWICE on your "stable" (ahahahahaha) gaming rig.
#33
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:22
Aaperture wrote...
Actually, I am way off. It's more like 5 times the price of an xbox, usually more.Blackest_Knight wrote...
Aaperture wrote...
What PC gamers don't realize is that they paid 3 times or more for their unstable gaming rig.
I laugh my ass off when you try to compare prices, are way off, and don't even bother to include the fact that you are paying for internet TWICE on your "stable" (ahahahahaha) gaming rig.
Bah, you can build a computer that can run pretty much any current game for about $700. Only about twice what a ps3 or maybe 3 times what an xbox costs. Plus it does more than play games. Don't get me wrong, I have an xbox as well and love it, but pc is better in almost every way.
Modifié par dgumb, 09 avril 2012 - 11:25 .
#34
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:30
LostMem0ry wrote...
Well since my PC hasn't had any magic yellow or red lights of death, I would consider it more stable than any console.Aaperture wrote...
What PC gamers don't realize is that they paid 3 times or more for their unstable gaming rig.
Neither has my Xbox. The new chips seem pretty solid. .... yeah, I'm crossing my fingers while I type that. *g*
The nice thing, though, is that I can buy a game for the console without worrying about whether it'll be compatible, whether I'll need to update or tweak my drivers, and whether I'll have to adjust its settings to Medium, Low, or 1995.
#35
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:32
And if you're doing a more honest evaluation, things look bad for the console real fast. Your display, for instance - your Xbox isn't much use without that. So why isn't your $300 TV included in the price? If you ignore it since it will be used for other purposes, the non-gaming portions of your PC get ignored for the same reason - and now your PC requires just a video card, and it's $150 for the PC vs $200 for the Xbox.
I don't know why anybody would even try to make this argument now though - a pc that performs equivalently to a 360 is now best described as a klunker, and you'll be buying it off ebay anyway.
#36
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:34
Phatose wrote...
If you want a PC that only has to match the performance of an XBox, $700 is stupidly overkill. If all you need is comparable performance to the console, you're looking more $300 tops.
And if you're doing a more honest evaluation, things look bad for the console real fast. Your display, for instance - your Xbox isn't much use without that. So why isn't your $300 TV included in the price? If you ignore it since it will be used for other purposes, the non-gaming portions of your PC get ignored for the same reason - and now your PC requires just a video card, and it's $150 for the PC vs $200 for the Xbox.
I don't know why anybody would even try to make this argument now though - a pc that performs equivalently to a 360 is now best described as a klunker, and you'll be buying it off ebay anyway.
Good points, let's remember that the xbox hardware is now what, 7 years old?
As for not having to change the settings between low, medium and 1995? Yeah, the xbox only does "low".
Modifié par dgumb, 09 avril 2012 - 11:34 .
#37
Posté 09 avril 2012 - 11:44





Retour en haut






