BioWare making announcement regarding ending at the end of the month?
#1
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:24
I read on facebook that BW are making an announcement @ the end of the month about the endings.
Just wanted to know... true or nay?
If it's true, I'm going to remain skeptical, and say that it won't be about adding new endings *SIGH*
#2
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:24
#3
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:25
#4
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:27
It was on my news feed. The page "Dr Liara T'Soni" posted something onto this page here, my friendDoomhams wrote...
Link or soemthing?
http://www.facebook....ngToMassEffect3
#5
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:29
lol you clearly need an explanation from Bioware (no offense) The endings provide closure to shep's story...just use your head...Xellith wrote...
They are making an annoucement "explaining" the endings. They havent said anything more. I call BS on the whole thing. We dont want an explanation. We want closure.
#6
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:30
Discuss. Interpretations.
Not official word on what they meant or what they are doing, if anything.
#7
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:31
alienatedflea wrote...
lol you clearly need an explanation from Bioware (no offense) The endings provide closure to shep's story...just use your head...Xellith wrote...
They are making an annoucement "explaining" the endings. They havent said anything more. I call BS on the whole thing. We dont want an explanation. We want closure.
No, they don't. I've used my head, and nothing makes sense.
But, you're obviously smarter than me. Why did the strong Commander Shepard beleive in the Catalyst without argument? And what happened to the fleet, and to your squadmates?
#8
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:32
alienatedflea wrote...
lol you clearly need an explanation from Bioware (no offense) The endings provide closure to shep's story...just use your head...Xellith wrote...
They are making an annoucement "explaining" the endings. They havent said anything more. I call BS on the whole thing. We dont want an explanation. We want closure.
Yes, the 30,000 people who voted on the poll are simply not using their head.
#9
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:33
Xellith wrote...
They are making an annoucement "explaining" the endings. They havent said anything more. I call BS on the whole thing. We dont want an explanation. We want closure.
That is bull. I don't want to watch them back track and MAKE UP an explination now. These endings so awful and so little effort put into them.
#10
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:33
rorako wrote...
alienatedflea wrote...
lol you clearly need an explanation from Bioware (no offense) The endings provide closure to shep's story...just use your head...Xellith wrote...
They are making an annoucement "explaining" the endings. They havent said anything more. I call BS on the whole thing. We dont want an explanation. We want closure.
No, they don't. I've used my head, and nothing makes sense.
But, you're obviously smarter than me. Why did the strong Commander Shepard beleive in the Catalyst without argument? And what happened to the fleet, and to your squadmates?
Or all the people you helped on the Citadel?
Why did I spend time upgrading their militia and making sure the Citadel Defence Force was as strong as possible if it meant NOTHING?
#11
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:33
#12
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:34
Modifié par Wattoes, 12 mars 2012 - 04:34 .
#13
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:35
I hate pointing people to my thread every time i post, but i guess it's better than copypasting the OP of it every time.
#14
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:35
Fact is, it may be biowares story, but the endings flopped. there was no variation at all. just death, destruction of relays... really..alienatedflea wrote...
lol you clearly need an explanation from Bioware (no offense) The endings provide closure to shep's story...just use your head...Xellith wrote...
They are making an annoucement "explaining" the endings. They havent said anything more. I call BS on the whole thing. We dont want an explanation. We want closure.
#15
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:36
#16
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:36
Wattoes wrote...
oops
I hope thats all the official statement from BioWare says, just "oops".
Modifié par HighScore 2600, 12 mars 2012 - 04:38 .
#17
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:36
to make the game longer... DUH?The Angry One wrote...
rorako wrote...
alienatedflea wrote...
lol you clearly need an explanation from Bioware (no offense) The endings provide closure to shep's story...just use your head...Xellith wrote...
They are making an annoucement "explaining" the endings. They havent said anything more. I call BS on the whole thing. We dont want an explanation. We want closure.
No, they don't. I've used my head, and nothing makes sense.
But, you're obviously smarter than me. Why did the strong Commander Shepard beleive in the Catalyst without argument? And what happened to the fleet, and to your squadmates?
Or all the people you helped on the Citadel?
Why did I spend time upgrading their militia and making sure the Citadel Defence Force was as strong as possible if it meant NOTHING?
#18
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:36
Wattoes wrote...
When you need to "explain" your ending, you know you've screwed up pretty bad.
Yeah, when you should find closer and you only get more questions there is a problem. No one cares that life eventually goes on in the galaxy(Stargazers) we want to know what happened with all the people/races we invested our hundreds of hours in.
#19
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:39
Bioware: "The explaination is in my car, just let me go get it." /Speeds off in Lambo purchased with ME3 revenue.Mr. Big Pimpin wrote...
"An announcement". Yeah, it'll probably be some half-assed "here's why the endings are so artistic, now buy our Omega DLC".
#20
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:40
"I saw... I'm not sure what i saw. Death... destruction... nothing's really clear."
#21
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:40
Favourite store on the CitadeI wrote...
HELLO FELLOW FORUMERS!
I read on facebook that BW are making an announcement @ the end of the month about the endings.
Just wanted to know... true or nay?
If it's true, I'm going to remain skeptical, and say that it won't be about adding new endings *SIGH*
That sounds unpromising. We don't want to talk about interpretations.
#22
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:40
#23
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:41
raeting wrote...
The community manager said she would discuss interpretations of the endings towards the end of the month.
Discuss. Interpretations.
Not official word on what they meant or what they are doing, if anything.
An ending that has to be interpreted is a broken ending. We don't need discussion, we need a fix.
#24
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:43
Or why he decided that the best way to prevent robots from killing everyone is to make robots to kill everyone?
Or who is he?
Or why can't we shove in his throat the quarian\\geth f& EDI facts?
Or why my squadmates magically teleported to the Normandy?
Or where the hell was Joker going?
Or why the crashlanded crew was happy when they crashlanded despite that they landed on a wild planet with no means of communication?
Or did the galaxy blown up along with the exploding relays?
Or why in blue ending Shep send the Reapers away, and not helps rebuild stuff?
Or why red option kills Geth aswell?
Or how Anderson made it to the citadel before me, despite even if you look around you see noone alive when Habinja hits you?
Or why couldn't space god turn the citadel himself all that time in ME1 \\ ME2 ?
Or why Sovereign states they have no beginning?
Or why we even condider Reaper threat as undestructible when it took just one Cain rocket to kill one?
I can go on forever.
#25
Posté 12 mars 2012 - 04:44
Players: "How does the crucible turn every organic creature in the universe into a cyborg? It doesn't make sense. How does a signal telling the reapers to withdrawl destroy relays and a starship? How is anyone getting back to their home planets when most advanced technology has been destroyed in the destroy ending?"
Bioware: "This was very clearly explained. The plans for the crucible were handed down by many cycles worth of organic races. Their finest wizards and sorcerers imbued it with massive amounts of space magic. As you are well aware, space magic comes in three varieties. Thus we had to limit ourselves to only the 3 endings."
Players: "Why would the Normandy be in FTL flight when at the time it was supposed to be engaged in the space battle that was still being waged?"
Bioware: "Oh come on! Did you see that cinematic?!? It's trying to outrun a shockwave! And you think their dead, but their not! Michael Bay inspired that scene."
Players: "So the reapers are synthetics who kill organics, to prevent organics form creating synthetics who will kill organics?"
Bioware: "Correct."
Players: "..."
Bioware: "Glad you finally understand. Now buy some DLC."
Modifié par Atraiyu Wrynn, 12 mars 2012 - 04:44 .





Retour en haut






