Let's just follow some logic here.
1) We have circa. 30,000 people coming out saying that the endings are flawed factually and logically.
2) Let's assume an average spread of the I.Q. spectrum across that 30,000 sample group.
3) A significant enough number of people of either:
a) average intelligence; or
have therefore stated the endings adhere to point 1.
3) Therefore, either the highly established rules of probability and I.Q. spectrums have totally broken down or 30,000 people have randomly become temporarily insane due to some environmental factors we're not aware of (unlikely due to the geographic spread of the grouping).
Conclusion: There is likely some merit in what is being said.
Modifié par Epiph1, 12 mars 2012 - 04:46 .





Retour en haut






