This whole section of the forum is NO SPOILERS, put this in the gameplay/story forumTopWargamer wrote...
Then if you thought it was spoilers when entering this thread, why read it?VolusvsReaper wrote...
kind of a spoiler not going to lie
You guys CLEARLY don't understand the Mass Effect 3 ending
#26
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:49
#27
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:50
TopWargamer wrote...
What?LeonardoLuiz wrote...
Why the dead squadmate appears on the normandy then?
Maybe that was for you....and not everybody else?
We should not be discussing this on a no spoilers forum but anyway. Guys who dont want be spoiled, dont read this.
Get a low EMS and bring your LI with you to the ending.
He/She will appear on the infamous normady scene
#28
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:50
Come on now, stop avoiding the topic. You guys are avoiding the discussion because you know you can't counter what I said.
#29
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:51
LeonardoLuiz wrote...
TopWargamer wrote...
What?LeonardoLuiz wrote...
Why the dead squadmate appears on the normandy then?
Maybe that was for you....and not everybody else?
We should not be discussing this on a no spoilers forum but anyway. Guys who dont want be spoiled, dont read this.
Get a low EMS and bring your LI with you to the ending.
He/She will appear on the infamous normady scene
Lulz
#30
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:51
ok.....endings are still crapTopWargamer wrote...
I love how you guys are avoiding true discussion by posting "I READ SPOILERS THAT I COULD HAVE CLICKED OUT OF" and "YOU'RE GETTING BANNED GOT THIS!"
Come on now, stop avoiding the topic. You guys are avoiding the discussion because you know you can't counter what I said.
#31
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:51
No one is avoiding your topic, its just IN THE WRONG SECTION.TopWargamer wrote...
I love how you guys are avoiding true discussion by posting "I READ SPOILERS THAT I COULD HAVE CLICKED OUT OF" and "YOU'RE GETTING BANNED GOT THIS!"
Come on now, stop avoiding the topic. You guys are avoiding the discussion because you know you can't counter what I said.
#32
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:53
For doing.....what?Kingme17 wrote...
TopWargamer.... you are a douchebag.
Posting stuff that EVERYBODY could have easily clicked out of? How hard is it to click out of a thread if you KNOW spoilers are involved?
I'm sorry that I have said something that pissed off the community and that you guys can't counter. Oh well.
#33
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:53
And saying very general stuff is not discussion.ediskrad327 wrote...
ok.....endings are still crapTopWargamer wrote...
I love how you guys are avoiding true discussion by posting "I READ SPOILERS THAT I COULD HAVE CLICKED OUT OF" and "YOU'RE GETTING BANNED GOT THIS!"
Come on now, stop avoiding the topic. You guys are avoiding the discussion because you know you can't counter what I said.
You are not and none of you CANNOT counter what I have said in my OP. Why? Because it's fact.
#34
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:54
TopWargamer wrote...
I love how you guys are avoiding true discussion by posting "I READ SPOILERS THAT I COULD HAVE CLICKED OUT OF" and "YOU'RE GETTING BANNED GOT THIS!"
Come on now, stop avoiding the topic. You guys are avoiding the discussion because you know you can't counter what I said.
-I dont usually employ ad hominems in any sense... but you make rocks seem like AI. And in your feeble arrogance you presume to have a patent on the truth and aesthetical judgement of writing. Despite apparently not knowing crap about how many plotholes there are basically from the word "go" in this game.
#35
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:54
Farbautisonn wrote...
Oh I undestand.
I undestand that 3 similar endings that basically violates the lore and setting logic in the last 10 minutes of the game has ruined the entire IP and made any playthrough (I had alot) completely redundant. It insults my intelligence that bioware thinks Im too stupid to notice.
This.
Although it doesn't speak of their view of fans' intelligence so much as how much they keep track of their own lore.
Edit: THe Mass Effect team, that is.
Modifié par NovinhaShepard, 13 mars 2012 - 03:55 .
#36
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:54
#37
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:54
TopWargamer wrote...
This is all copy and pasted from another website.That's the point.Posted by: halomaster10144How can you enjoy them? They're all melancholy and sad, along with lacking a real objective.
You are in the final battle to defeat the Reapers, everybody thinks that the Crucibal is a huge ship that shoots out beams or some crap like that to take down all of the Reapers.
The Crucibal lands on The Citadel, and then that's when you found out the only decisions to choose. Each would stop the Reapers, but in the end, you would still have to sacrifice your life to save the galaxy.
Kill one, save the rest. You can't change the purpose of the Crucibal. The Crucibal's only way to defeat the Reapers was one of those 3 decisions. You can't change canon to make the community happy, i'm sorry, but that's what the Crucibal is, and that's how you activate it.
It's spelled Crucible. But anyway.
Most of the people have problems with the plot holes all over the endings. Not with the fact that they're sad. I personally like a sad ending just as much as a happy one when it's well written.
The trouble is, these endings are just plain bad and not very well executed either. The holes, all over. Seriously. If it was a piece of clothing, you'd wonder where the fabric is because all you see is a naked person. The holes are that big.
Modifié par Nachtritter76, 13 mars 2012 - 03:57 .
#38
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:55
no it is not.....and this is still the non-spoile forum get some glassesTopWargamer wrote...
And saying very general stuff is not discussion.ediskrad327 wrote...
ok.....endings are still crapTopWargamer wrote...
I love how you guys are avoiding true discussion by posting "I READ SPOILERS THAT I COULD HAVE CLICKED OUT OF" and "YOU'RE GETTING BANNED GOT THIS!"
Come on now, stop avoiding the topic. You guys are avoiding the discussion because you know you can't counter what I said.
You are not and none of you CANNOT counter what I have said in my OP. Why? Because it's fact.
#39
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:55
#40
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:56
TopWargamer wrote...
Come on now, stop avoiding the topic. You guys are avoiding the discussion because you know you can't counter what I said.
No, it's just that what you said was so monumentally idiotic that it's not worth the time to write up a serious response.
#41
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:56
If you smoke in the 'no smoking' area and you shout, "I'm smoking in here!" should people not be pissed because you warned them?
Modifié par The Big Nothing, 13 mars 2012 - 03:56 .
#42
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:56
How so?VolusvsReaper wrote...
It's funny you could have just deleted your OP and people would have understood but then you spout off like a child and just make yourself look ridiculous.
By telling people that they could have easily clicked out of a thread? By saying something in my OP that is clearly canon?
And how would people understand if I deleted my OP? That makes no sense....deleting it will do nothing.
#43
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:56
The endings were bull, you know it, I know it, thousands of other people know it.
#44
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:56
#45
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:56
How is canon idiotic?BaladasDemnevanni wrote...
TopWargamer wrote...
Come on now, stop avoiding the topic. You guys are avoiding the discussion because you know you can't counter what I said.
No, it's just that what you said was so monumentally idiotic that it's not worth the time to write up a serious response.
#46
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:57
TopWargamer wrote...
And saying very general stuff is not discussion.ediskrad327 wrote...
ok.....endings are still crapTopWargamer wrote...
I love how you guys are avoiding true discussion by posting "I READ SPOILERS THAT I COULD HAVE CLICKED OUT OF" and "YOU'RE GETTING BANNED GOT THIS!"
Come on now, stop avoiding the topic. You guys are avoiding the discussion because you know you can't counter what I said.
You are not and none of you CANNOT counter what I have said in my OP. Why? Because it's fact.
This is quite possibly one of the most stupid things I have ever read.
How can your opinions be a fact?
Really?? Fact??
Disregard what the OP thinks. Lets talk about waffles.
#47
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:58
I can see Sherlock. I can read correctly.ediskrad327 wrote...
no it is not.....and this is still the non-spoile forum get some glassesTopWargamer wrote...
And saying very general stuff is not discussion.ediskrad327 wrote...
ok.....endings are still crapTopWargamer wrote...
I love how you guys are avoiding true discussion by posting "I READ SPOILERS THAT I COULD HAVE CLICKED OUT OF" and "YOU'RE GETTING BANNED GOT THIS!"
Come on now, stop avoiding the topic. You guys are avoiding the discussion because you know you can't counter what I said.
You are not and none of you CANNOT counter what I have said in my OP. Why? Because it's fact.
Stop avoiding topic. Discuss, if this thread gets locked, so be it. If I get banned, so be it.
#48
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:58
MattFini wrote...
Keep trolling like a boss. You're doing an excellent job.
There is a difference between trolling and just being dumber than a stump....
otherwise Forest Gump would be the Stephen Hawking of trolling.
#49
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:58
So no, the whole time you spent building up assets was a waste, in the end you attack regardless maybe with 1 or 2 bad scenes where a few ships die more quickly, and then you get to the end and are thrown a horrible ending.
You can defend the ending, but you can't defend the final level which proves that throughout the entirety of the game, your assets really don't matter at all and so it was a lie that they would.
#50
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 03:58




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






