ticklefist wrote...
Let me preface by saying I don't find any of these endings satisfying. Still, they are what they are and they're not going away. Every single ending has its own positives and negatives.
So true. This I agree with completely.
ticklefist wrote...
Green creates what will be a peaceful end of the cycle for all time. It is both the most virtuous and most selfless. You save everybody at the cost of your own life but you destroy the mass relays in the process.
Not quite.
Sure, The Catalyst claims it's the next step in evolution and a "final solution", but it said the same thing about Reapers and then admitted that their solution doesn't work anymore.
Also, the Reapers may be changed in this ending, but they're still out there somewhere and this time without anyone to control them. Who's to say they won't decide to revert back to their original goal of destroying all advanced life every 50k years?
Finally, what right does Shepard (or anyone else for that matter) have to decide what life in the galaxy should be like? Isn't one of the main themes of Mass Effect the premise that every form of life has the right to choose it's own destiny, make it's own choices (including mistakes) and solve it's own problems?
Isn't that right to live and self determine the very reason you're fighting the Reapers?
And you'd throw all that away based on a word of some entity you met 5 minutes ago and which, by it's own admition, was wrong before and could be wrong again?
Sorry, but synthesis leaves far to many unknowns to be considered the "best" solution for the whole galaxy.
ticklefist wrote...
Blue is the middle road. You develop a peace of sorts. You save the Citadel and mass relays (watch the vids) but you're no better than TIM. You do not die, but you do not carry on living. While seemingly good, not entirely selfless.
IMO, this is the worst case scenario of all 3.
Nobody, aside from the Catalyst, has ever been able to control the Reapers. The last guy who tried that, TIM, got indoctrinated. If no organic being could do it, what guarantee do we have Shep will? Because he/she is a an extraordinary individual? Sure, but he/she is still human. There's no guarantee she/he won't slip at some point or get overwhelmed by the Reapers.
ticklefist wrote...
Red is the seemingly right choice. Using Anderson as the avatar of this choice is a deception. It's actually the worst and most selfish. You only end the current cycle. You kill all synthetic life including allies and friends. You destroy the mass relays. You live.
It also gives you the least unknowns.
1) the Reapers are destoyed and the cicle is broken. Nass Relays ad Citadel go BOOM!
2) Synthetic life (EDI and Geth) is destroyed, yes, but organic life that remains stay as it is and is free to pursue a future on their own terms. The pirce is heavy, but the result is complete freedom for those who remain.
3) Organics will make new synthetics which will turn on their creators
The most deceptiive notion out of everything the Catalyst said. Sure, Geth and Quarians initially support this claim, due to them turning on each other, but Geth were pushed into conflict to preserve themselves. They were willing to accept a peeaceful solution when it was presented to them.
And finaly, EDI herself. A creation that turns on it's creators (Cerberus) and does what? Saves organics (crew of the Normandy) and evolves into something quite human. A perfect example that the 2 forms of life can coexist and even become similar without the whole "godlike transformation" of synthesis.