391 réponses à ce sujet

[see_kay]

No. Shephard's story ends here, good or bad. It's time for new cast of characters to take over for the next iteration of mass effect franchise.

[alberta]

see_kay wrote...

No. Shephard's story ends here, good or bad. It's time for new cast of characters to take over for the next iteration of mass effect franchise.

Mind if I were to say - without the relays there is no Mass Effect as such. If my memory serves me correctly - in ME1 it said this was the Mass Effect - the relays.

[DrDark101]

I accepted long before Mass 3 was released that this would be Shapards last outing and I'm okay with this. Moving on from Shepard may be hard but its important to do so. As Bioware needs new subject matter to build a new story with. Continuing to be Shepard doesn't really allow for much creative forward thinking at this point.

[mackan__s]

This isnt the end of Sheoard, i just know it. Why the hell did they put the Stargazer scene and the breath scen there for then?

[tobiasks]

I actually still want Shepard.

[leimana]

RebelByDesign wrote...

Only if by Mass Effect 4 they mean Mass Effect 3, Part 2. The game so epic they realized they had to split it in half.

I wouldn't be happy about being misled but I'd still play it (probably).

I kinda think the same thing. But I am OK with Shepards story ending (in 3) if the ending made sense. 

Modifié par leimana, 27 mars 2012 - 06:40 .

[Hexley UK]

Desecrator wrote...

Well title says it all, Bioware should stop noobing out and bring Shepard and the core companions back in ME4.

I dont understand why Bioware wants to stop the Shepard story in Mass Effect, they should make it so that Shepard IS Bioware just like Master Chief IS Xbox.

Lets be honost for a moment, most of us (if not all of us) want Shepard to continue his Legacy as the main character in future Mass Effect games, and we want to see the core companions back aswell.

So Bioware, stop trying to make things a hell of a lot more complicated and keep it simple... Gives us Shepard and his team back in future Mass Effect Games! That way you keep everyone happy AND you make alot more money... It really is that simple...

P.S Im not english and im trying my best to word what im thinking, sorry if i messed it up a bit

Damn straight OP, at this point I can't imagine playing another ME game without the Shepster.

[Bellendaine]

I started a thread about this a week or so ago. I totally agree. I'm not ready to let go of Shepard, personally; he's a great character, and I think a clever writer could continue his story for *at least* one more story ... if Holmes can have multiple books, why not Shep? I find the idea of killing off (or ending) an awesome protagonist silly on the part of a creator ... Conan Doyle eventually had to agree.

[kkndgr]

Um no offense bit since Shepard destroys either the whole galaxy or turn everybody into some kind of cyborgs ill be no point ,unless if finally we get proper kind of ending but then again Shepard suppose to be only for the trilogy according to bipware now ofcpurse if EA can milk more money by continuing shepards story then I am sure tha Shepard will be back.But I don't think it will happen.

[Mitra]

Now that I think about this after few days....

No, no thinking anymore, Shepard is Mass Effect. That's it.
There is a great potential (or it's just my rich imagination), but Shepard has a lot more to say. Shepard IS Shepard for a reason. And you don't have to have Reapers as enemy, every good writer can make even worse enemy (You don't have to believe me, but it's true, tried that with my writings, "turn the tide" works pretty fantastic if done correctly). It can be done perfect and correct. They don't have to end this trilogy with Shepards end, only the Reaper one.
I see the great potential (if they fix this nonsense of ending properly).
I'm so sorry if BW has stepped into the grey zone and lacks sights.


EDIT: There is a great deal with that stupid thing what they did in the first place by saying "This was ment to be only a trilogy". They have a great story. Why limits? No good. Don't force/put limits in peoples minds if you already gave them a great story. I really hope that they do want to make a serious business
And yet then, they told us there will be more ME games, but without Shep. I kinda don't believe that they will stay at this thought.

Modifié par Mitra, 27 mars 2012 - 07:24 .

[Bellendaine]

Mitra wrote...

Now that I think about this after few days....

No, no thinking anymore, Shepard is Mass Effect. That's it.
There is a great potential (or it's just my rich imagination), but Shepard has a lot more to say. Shepard IS Shepard for a reason. And you don't have to have Reapers as enemy, every good writer can make even worse enemy (You don't have to believe me, but it's true, tried that with my writings, "turn the tide" works pretty fantastic if done correctly). It can be done perfect and correct. They don't have to end this trilogy with Shepards end, only the Reaper one.
I see the great potential (if they fix this nonsense of ending properly).
I'm so sorry if BW has stepped into the grey zone and lacks sights.


EDIT: There is a great deal with that stupid thing what they did in the first place by saying "This was ment to be only a trilogy". They have a great story. Why limits? No good. Don't force/put limits in peoples minds if you already gave them a great story. I really hope that they do want to make a serious business
And yet then, they told us there will be more ME games, but without Shep. I kinda don't believe that they will stay at this thought.

Agreed, agreed, agreed, agreed, agreed ... short-sighted imho, to call Shep's story a definitive "trilogy."  Always a bad idea to limit yourself with a creation, especially if it's a hit ...

[Drake_1000]

Wait. What ? There is no ME4 and we still dont see the ending of ME3 so what is this thread ?

[Logiwonk]

Yeah NO. I want it to end already. I was promised an ending. Seriously.

[CerealWar]

I think it would be awesome if ME4 had a 80 year old Shepard as a squadmate. Oldman Shepard. He was kicking asses and saving the galaxy before you were even a twinkle in your pappy's eye.

[BubbleDncr]

After the way ME3 ended...I don't want a Mass Effect 4.

[Michael177]

I know one thing, I definitely do NOT want shepard in another game. Like I think it's a great character and all but... If you have shepard in another game people want to have most of his companions, and if you have all of his companions again it's only possible to have the same conversation about calibrations before it gets silly .

Also I don't really want to keep having to buy more and more mass effect games simply because I want to find out what happens to shepard and his buddies. but yeah

[DJ CAVE SLAVE]

rma2110 wrote...

I'm ready for a fresh new face as well.

Same here.

[in2seconds]

Well if the leaks are true, you'll definitely see shepard again, albeit on a different form.

[luzburg]

nah. providing that we get a ending dlc with the possebilety to shepard to survive.. i only want to se
shepard as a random character you can met or decendents of her (prefably asari shepards XD)

one thing i can se if you had a romance where a child is produced you can be that child as an adult in future games. if its an asari they add some years in the prolouge or if human you are the grandchild of shepard

[Makatak]

This is like saying that Master Chief IS Halo.

Personally, I thought ODST was an incredible stand-alone title. I loved the Rookie, I loved the game, and I thought the story was the best in the Halo series short of Halo 1 itself. So to say that Mass Effect can't exist without Shepard is to take a stance that argues against precedent.

[JELLAQTP]

I don´t have a problem with a new ME without Shepard. Bit it will be very hard to do it.

[Deventh]

I would love to play Shepard again in ME4, but if they give an AWESOME ending to ME3 and probably to play as the child of Shepard in ME4 i would still be happy.

[Nighthunteer]

gimzod76 wrote...

DarkSpider88 wrote...

No Shepard no Mass Effect for me. I tried it with no Warden in DA2, didn't work then doesn't work now.

my thoughts exactly. 

[Apocsapel91]

I'm actually hoping for a new protagonist for the next ME game. Why you may ask? It's because I hope the next game takes place at least a century in the future. That way, the galaxy has enough time to recover from the Reaper Invasion (assuming that the ending is changed so that the galaxy isn't completely screwed over).

[jzzabelle]

I just want liara