Actually...while it's better, I still don't think this ending is great. It retains too many of the same problems. It still has the 3 confusing choices at the end, including the fact that destroying the reapers also destroys other synthetic life. And it's nice that only that option destroys the mass relays, but then again it gets muddled with the fact that it's still the only ending where Shepard lives. And the synthesis choice still doesn't make sense. So all the endings are still kinda bad and confusing.
Yeah there are more varied outcomes and the final cut-scenes seem more satisfying (and no more stupid ghost kid), but it's still disorienting and unclear. So...close but not quite.
proof endings were changed
Débuté par
Tazzmission
, mars 13 2012 07:01
#126
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 06:55
#127
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 07:02
I'm Commander Shepard and I see 0 proof in this post. (but I like these better then the crap we were given)
#128
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 07:07
I don't believe anything Tazz says. His threads are always retarded. Saying you have proof when you actually don't is, well.....stupid, to be honest.
Modifié par TexasToast712, 14 mars 2012 - 07:08 .
#129
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 07:14
Bumping this because I still like this version of the ending a lot.
#130
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 08:51
True or not, the lack of Harbinger in the entire ME3 game means there is more to come IMO. If not, i'll still be a fanboy of ME.
#131
Posté 15 mars 2012 - 08:19
This idea just makes these seem so much better as endings
#132
Posté 15 mars 2012 - 09:55
Too bad that went to hell when Microsoft accidentally leaked the script along with the beta. I don't this is even Bioware's fault. Well except for what the writers put in to replace the original endings..
#133
Posté 15 mars 2012 - 10:26
I still see no proof to this so far.
It does make more sense.
Delivers a more acceptable ending as your choices play a bigger role and you have the opportunity to get a fairly positive ending, if you played well enough, got enough choices right.
This combined with a sort of that happened to them and those, (even if it was just in text) would have made me happy.
Hell, I got almost 8000 EMS, lost no one in ME2, didn't lose Tali, didn't loose Miranda or Samara and what did I get for that? This would have been a much, much better ending.
It does make more sense.
Delivers a more acceptable ending as your choices play a bigger role and you have the opportunity to get a fairly positive ending, if you played well enough, got enough choices right.
This combined with a sort of that happened to them and those, (even if it was just in text) would have made me happy.
Hell, I got almost 8000 EMS, lost no one in ME2, didn't lose Tali, didn't loose Miranda or Samara and what did I get for that? This would have been a much, much better ending.
#134
Posté 15 mars 2012 - 10:50
Well... seems like in these days everything could be possible, but
if even those were original endings why the f*** make a cutscene with stranded Normandy when with the same success (and avoiding lots of rage) they could show them on Earth after the color choice is made?
if even those were original endings why the f*** make a cutscene with stranded Normandy when with the same success (and avoiding lots of rage) they could show them on Earth after the color choice is made?
#135
Posté 15 mars 2012 - 10:57
I'd take the OP's words with a huge truckload of salt. He's a well known Bioware fanboy who likes the endings and does attempt to troll from time to time.
#136
Posté 15 mars 2012 - 11:11
Fake or not, the game would be better, if it was like he said...
#137
Posté 15 mars 2012 - 04:35
Another reason I like these endings better than the Indoctrination theory is that the Indoctrination theory implies that only one ending (the destroy ending) is the "right" one. This one is better because it has both positive and negative outcomes for each choice which are explained enough to satisfy, but enough still left vague so as to remain open to speculation. It would retain the emotional weight and sense of sacrifice, but still feel like a victory, and more importantly, it would MAKE SENSE.
#138
Posté 15 mars 2012 - 04:49
True or not better than what we have AND I can't think of any plot-holes present in this version unlike the one we got.
#139
Posté 15 mars 2012 - 05:27
Dont understand how paid writers for a game can only come up with what they put as the end of ME3 but random fans in the space of a week or so can come up with something like this.
#140
Posté 15 mars 2012 - 05:28
TexasToast712 wrote...
I don't believe anything Tazz says. His threads are always retarded. Saying you have proof when you actually don't is, well.....stupid, to be honest.
hows the tin foil hat working for ya?
it must suck having to live in paranoid thinking everything is a lie by everyone
#141
Posté 23 mars 2012 - 06:30
For a thread with a title like this you sure are low on solid proof. =P But it's a good story and perhaps it is true.
All I know is, the same people who wrote Mass Effect 1, 2 and the first 95% of 3 are freaking geniuses and there is no way in hell they would have even considered an ending like the one we got. Something went wrong bigtime.
All I know is, the same people who wrote Mass Effect 1, 2 and the first 95% of 3 are freaking geniuses and there is no way in hell they would have even considered an ending like the one we got. Something went wrong bigtime.
#142
Posté 08 avril 2012 - 10:03
There is no proof but this endings sound 100% better than the ones we have. I hope at that the Extended DLC will provide something similar or even better but still hesitate to believe it given the ending they decided to give us. And they don't want to remove the catalyst boy, so...
#143
Posté 08 avril 2012 - 10:41
Deklan_Caine wrote...
TheDove wrote...
The proof is in the pudding. This isn't pudding though.
LOL!





Retour en haut






