bioware is not changing the ending, so at least, please explain this one!!
who is the kid?
who built the reapers?
what event caused the builiding of the reapers?
who are the keepers?
I don't want a new ending, I want to UNDERSTAND the current!!
Débuté par
filetemo
, mars 13 2012 07:29
#1
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:29
#2
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:29
Ew. I'd rather forget about FutureChild.
#3
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:30
You pretty much understand it.
Your mind is just trying to reject it and look deeper because it is that bad.
Your mind is just trying to reject it and look deeper because it is that bad.
#4
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:33
The Kid is a Guilt Driven Reaper Image.
We don't know but we do know from every interaction they want us dead and turned in to goo.
Some race in past society trying to make Synergy.
The little bugs running around the Citadel maintaining it.
We don't know but we do know from every interaction they want us dead and turned in to goo.
Some race in past society trying to make Synergy.
The little bugs running around the Citadel maintaining it.
Modifié par Shunt Mcblunt, 13 mars 2012 - 07:33 .
#5
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:34
It's the cut, butchered remains of the real ending... explanation given.
http://www.gamefaqs....fect-3/62230265
http://www.gamefaqs....fect-3/62230265
#6
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:36
No one knows, not even Bioware's writers.
#7
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:36
theres nothing else to understand. and that is the very reason why we dont understand it. you see? the shallowness of the ending is nothing like the deeply explained story and former endings of the series.
theres nothing more to understand before what we dont understand will never be explained since its not there. unless they finally give us the ending we want.
theres nothing more to understand before what we dont understand will never be explained since its not there. unless they finally give us the ending we want.
#8
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:37
Yes, let Bioware just explain it if the ending is good. Where does the Normandy crash, why was it in a relay jump, didn't explosing relays destroy the planets around them, etc.
#9
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:37
What you ought to be doing is signing the various petitions and expressing your discontent so we can get actual closure.
#10
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:37
The ending is as superficial and shallow as it seems.
It's just bad writing or rushed writing.
It's just bad writing or rushed writing.
#11
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:41
WarBaby2 wrote...
It's the cut, butchered remains of the real ending... explanation given.
http://www.gamefaqs....fect-3/62230265
Holy sh**! What is the original source for this? This would have been infinitely better.
#12
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:41
even bad endings have to make sense, the current ones do not.
#13
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:42
Can't understand something that doesn't make any sense.
#14
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:42
mike gamble said they wouldn't "pull a Lost" and that we would know about the origin and motives of the reapers. Way to go.
#15
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:42
WarBaby2 wrote...
It's the cut, butchered remains of the real ending... explanation given.
http://www.gamefaqs....fect-3/62230265
Is this backed up with proof (or at least very good evidence) other than Anderson's and Joker's cut dialog?
#16
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:43
fight with it OP, do not SURRENDER !
#17
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 07:44
http://social.biowar...index/9727423/1
Very good theory supported with in game evidence.
Beat you Mr. Woo!!!! haha
Very good theory supported with in game evidence.
Beat you Mr. Woo!!!! haha
Modifié par Prince Keldar, 13 mars 2012 - 07:50 .
#18
Posté 13 mars 2012 - 08:04
WarBaby2 wrote...
It's the cut, butchered remains of the real ending... explanation given.
http://www.gamefaqs....fect-3/62230265
You know, I can actually believe this. It's infinitely better than the garbage we got, anyway.





Retour en haut







