Modifié par TcomJ, 14 mars 2012 - 05:55 .
Article on Gamefront supporting our position!
Débuté par
kunzite
, mars 14 2012 01:57
#251
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 05:54
#252
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 05:55
Ross Lincoln is my new Shepard, going boldly out on the media with a well written, thought out and more importantly explained and then counter explained with what questions others might throw him before there even asked...
and as per usual, has done the right thing and stated that 95% of the game is excellent aside a few bugs.
but like all things in the world, bad news wins VS good news, and no matter how good the rest of the game is, the bad ending mires the series with a myriad of new concepts unanswered ones and overall non effect of gamer action for end result.
and as per usual, has done the right thing and stated that 95% of the game is excellent aside a few bugs.
but like all things in the world, bad news wins VS good news, and no matter how good the rest of the game is, the bad ending mires the series with a myriad of new concepts unanswered ones and overall non effect of gamer action for end result.
#253
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 05:56
That article was full to the brim of winning.
#254
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 05:56
he did an amazing job of explaining it. another good journalist.
hold the line!
hold the line!
#255
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 05:57
Stanley Woo wrote...
Shameless bumping with no discussion is considered spam hereabouts. Please cut it out.
How is it shameful if somebody want to get a message out? It's free speech and it's really reasonably argued with no bias. :S
I gonna put it in a simple analogy:
You enjoy a wonderful three course meal...... but the last mouthful turns out to be fecal matter.
You then purge your stomach of ALL three courses.... and I paid them for this experience.
Not to mention canon already exists that blowing up a relay destroys all life in that system,... so all ending(s) result in the death of every system with a mass relay.
You end the reaper threat by destroying the entire galaxy? Really?
That isn't artistic... for a three title franchise, that is suicide.
And yet, the customers in the resteraunt don't get to complain? pfff
Modifié par TcomJ, 14 mars 2012 - 06:01 .
#256
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 06:00
very well written article!
#257
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 06:00
KainrycKarr wrote...
Stanley Woo wrote...
Shameless bumping with no discussion is considered spam hereabouts. Please cut it out.
Shamelessly false advertising for a product is considered poor business ethics. Please cut it out.
This was priceless..
#258
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 06:03
This is a fantastic article that I hope the people criticizing us will read. Copy this article and post it as a response to the likes of Kotaku, IGN videos, etc.
#259
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 06:06
I started posting this everywhere
#260
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 06:10
I'm glad to know that the truth of the matter is coming out. Gotta love the free market.
#261
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 06:14
More people need to spread the word about this one
#262
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 06:26
More people need to see this.. how is it falling so fast off the front page..
#263
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 06:33
It's on the FB Retake ME3 page with 235 likes, so I think it's getting some exposure. I've also posted it on one Kotaku article and the Destructoid Show comments.
#264
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 06:35
As a certain Krogan shaman once said, "Haha! I LIKE this human! He understands!"
HOLD THE LINE!
HOLD THE LINE!
#265
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 06:44
Perfect article. Explains all of the ending concerns clearly and succinctly, and leaves very little room for disagreement.
#266
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 06:46
Really great article. Ignoring the fact that he agrees with a lot of us, it's just very well written in general and brings a lot to the table to express his argument.
Take a look at this and then head over to IGN's response (via Colin) and laugh at how awful and childish his video comes off as. It's not about him disagreeing, it's how he doesn't even try to understand both sides of the argument and just labels fans as whiners and entitled brats.
This is real journalism vs. the crappy journalism so many of us see in the gaming industry in its current state.
Take a look at this and then head over to IGN's response (via Colin) and laugh at how awful and childish his video comes off as. It's not about him disagreeing, it's how he doesn't even try to understand both sides of the argument and just labels fans as whiners and entitled brats.
This is real journalism vs. the crappy journalism so many of us see in the gaming industry in its current state.
Modifié par Linus108, 14 mars 2012 - 06:48 .
#267
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 06:58
Nice to read something like this. People aren't alone in this. It's not just 'nerds raging' on forums and whining.
Bioware messed up here and many can see it.
Bioware messed up here and many can see it.
#268
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 07:08
That pretty much sums it all!
#269
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 07:10
Straight to the point, the End is totally wrong, it should be rewritten letter by letter.
#270
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 07:15
IGN should have steered clear.. now they face the same outrage that others are at this point.. It really annoys me the arrogance of all involved with defending Bioware.. IGN.. Kataku..Penny Arcade..
Gamefront hit the nail on the head.. Bioware royally screwed up here.. And for that they should own up to it or face the consequences just as Shepard would do..
Gamefront hit the nail on the head.. Bioware royally screwed up here.. And for that they should own up to it or face the consequences just as Shepard would do..
#271
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 07:20
A great article, at last a game journalist that acknowledges the flaws.
Modifié par Stamina Rose, 14 mars 2012 - 07:21 .
#272
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 07:31
Finally a game journalist is on our side. Hallelujah!
#273
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 07:32
One of the best articles in our defense so far.I'd like to see IGN try to bash that. Kudos.
#274
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 07:33
Mmmmaybe, but i read the article and found the points valid - and I can't recall what a single ad was for, or what they looked like, or even if they were there. I'm pretty blind to internet banners at this point.bitplane wrote...
Any "X nouns why thing is position" are nothing but advert-bait, those sort of titles are made to suck the maximum number of people in so that they view the ads.
#275
Posté 14 mars 2012 - 07:54
This was a good article that sums up how we feel and doesn't insult us on how we're all just being big babies.





Retour en haut




