Aller au contenu

Photo

Article on Gamefront supporting our position!


350 réponses à ce sujet

#26
FlyingCow371

FlyingCow371
  • Members
  • 182 messages
Anybody remember interviews like this one from pre-release:
http://www.oxm.co.uk...-sophisticated/ 

"We have the ability to build the endings out in a way that we don't have to worry about eventually tying them back together somewhere," Hudson explained."This story arc is coming to an end with this game. That means the endings can be a lot more different. At this point we're taking into account so many decisions that you've made as a player and reflecting a lot of that stuff. It's not even in any way like the traditional game endings, where you can say how many endings there are or whether you got ending A, B, or C."It's more like there are some really obvious things that are different and then lots and lots of smaller things, lots of things about who lives and who dies, civilizations that rose and fell, all the way down to individual characters. That becomes the state of where you left your galaxy. The endings have a lot more sophistication and variety in them."


It doesn't sound like he was playing the same game at all. Either he was lying, or he didn't actually play through the end of the game or talk to anybody who played through the ending, or bioware already created other alternate, better, endings with some closure and not dooming everybody who came to fight for Earth.

#27
AlexXIV

AlexXIV
  • Members
  • 10 670 messages
I hope this is a devopment towards our cause. If more and more official sites give the ending a second glance they may find that it is inevitable to talk about the flaws of it.

#28
CheeseEnchilada

CheeseEnchilada
  • Members
  • 1 213 messages
This is a great read, and I love that every point is fully explained, rather than it just being a quick list.

#29
Nobrandminda

Nobrandminda
  • Members
  • 1 289 messages
Very nice.

#30
MattFini

MattFini
  • Members
  • 3 573 messages
Good stuff. And stories like this will continue to give us momentum.

#31
Goose1004

Goose1004
  • Members
  • 152 messages
Nice article

#32
SilencedScream

SilencedScream
  • Members
  • 853 messages
Great article by an intelligent writer.

I'm sick of the publications that are insulting us - the people that READ them! - over the issue. Cover it. That's fine. Express displeasure. Express disappointment. But please, don't insult the very people that read your articles...

#33
Vaktathi

Vaktathi
  • Members
  • 752 messages
A perfect and well illustrated position of the issues we as fans have with the ending to this game. I hope it gets seen by more!

Holding.

#34
WhiteVV1ings

WhiteVV1ings
  • Members
  • 464 messages
Yes, great article. We must continue to HOLD THE LINE.

#35
Unit-Alpha

Unit-Alpha
  • Members
  • 4 015 messages
Also, thank you, Mr. Woo, for adding the Bioware tag to the thread; makes it a lot easier for people to find.

Modifié par Unit-Alpha, 14 mars 2012 - 02:45 .


#36
MPSai

MPSai
  • Members
  • 1 366 messages
Sums up the issues with the ending and how it affects the fans perfectly.

#37
Corrik Ronis

Corrik Ronis
  • Members
  • 367 messages
Always good to see more support.

#38
clonedoriginzero

clonedoriginzero
  • Members
  • 618 messages
nice to see an article who actually analyzed the reasons why people are upset.

alot of the other articles are "durr nerds are mad!"

#39
TheDove

TheDove
  • Members
  • 464 messages
Wisdom, this game journalist has it

#40
TheSneric

TheSneric
  • Members
  • 61 messages
very good read, completely agree with it

#41
zarnk567

zarnk567
  • Members
  • 1 847 messages
Hold the line people, we are gaining more support as we go along

Modifié par zarnk567, 14 mars 2012 - 02:43 .


#42
pomrink

pomrink
  • Members
  • 1 350 messages
very good article. it really captured all the arguments properly and didn't make a "strawman" of them. every single point in the article is what we've been trying to say on these forums and on all these social networking sites, and a large amount of gaming press has been ignore. A++

Also, mr woo and all moderators here, i want to thank you for being so (for the lack of a better phrase) permissive and open minded about all the bioware criticism, I know a lot of us, in your place, would just liberally ban and shut down threads, in all seriousness, thank you.

#43
Tequila Man

Tequila Man
  • Members
  • 647 messages

Unit-Alpha wrote...

Also, thank you, Mr. Woo, for adding the Bioware tag to the thread; makes it a lot eeasier for people to find.



Alpha, you're so win I would lose just to see you win, except I can't. Because, you see, you win.

#44
UrdnotGrunty2

UrdnotGrunty2
  • Members
  • 398 messages
Read this Bioware

#45
bitplane

bitplane
  • Members
  • 26 messages

VerdantSF wrote...

I loved this part:

"Legion immediately changes the synthetic/organic debate when you gain him as a character. Rather than furthering a Matrix-like view of a world in which machines eventually kill their creators, Legion proves that all forms of life can and do have value, and that it is absolutely possible for synthetic and organic life to co-exist peacefully. Throw in EDI from Mass Effect 3 and the debate changes radically again — now synthetic and organic characters aren’t just not killing each other, they’re actively hooking up of their own free will.

That doesn’t sound like a world in which the cylons are destined to nuke the humans. Mass Effect 3 even gives you a chance to redeem the quarians and the geth in their struggle and reunite creator and created, parent and child. These events, in the very same game, are fundamentally opposed to the philosophy of the ending and the themes it represents."


It doesn't though, given enough time the machines will win, regardless of whether they go to war with us or not they will outlive us and may well convert all life into non-thinking matter. I started a topic about this here.

#46
tay2208

tay2208
  • Members
  • 435 messages
An extremely well written article that hightlights every point that all of us are upset about.

#47
UrdnotGrunty2

UrdnotGrunty2
  • Members
  • 398 messages

Stanley Woo wrote...

Shameless bumping with no discussion is considered spam hereabouts. Please cut it out.


The only reason you want us to cut it out is because its right and points out even deeper flaws in the so called artistic ending

#48
Tryptomine

Tryptomine
  • Members
  • 32 messages

"But the majority of the ending is an exercise in increasing incomprehensibility, beginning with the abrupt appearance of The Illusive Man. Without any warning, he just kind of… shows up in the control room with Shep and Anderson. It is never explained how this is even possible; there isn’t even a cursory “Shepard, as you can see, I planned to save Yumanity by purchasing a penthouse here on the citadel. PEACE.”

What? While I am generally with the negative consensus about the ending, I never saw this bit as a problem. It was clearly stated that the Illusive Man knew that the CItadel was the Catalyst, and that he could use it to control the Reapers. It was also explicitly stated he fled to the CItadel the moment he realized this, right before the Reapers captured it. Granted, it was odd that he pops up suddenly in a super secret area no ones ever been to before (at least Shep and Anderson got there by special means), but I'm willing to chalk that bit up to creative lisence or Reaper influence.

#49
Esquin

Esquin
  • Members
  • 709 messages

Stanley Woo wrote...

Shameless bumping with no discussion is considered spam hereabouts. Please cut it out.


If your bosses stopped ignoring their fan base then we wouldn't need to bump anything. We deserve a comment on what happens next.

#50
Yalision

Yalision
  • Members
  • 1 057 messages
Awesome article. More exposure is a good thing.