Aller au contenu

Photo

Any Gay (Or Gay-Friendly) Players Out There?


1717 réponses à ce sujet

#1601
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

CrimsonN7 wrote...

BurningLiquor wrote...

theillusiveman11 wrote...

This thread, in reference to the newb friendly thread.


The newb-friendly thread was a troll thread and was locked.


I would take this thread out for an expensive dinner.:wub:


After our dinner first Image IPBImage IPB

#1602
CrimsonN7

CrimsonN7
  • Members
  • 17 258 messages

ifritanshiva wrote...

CrimsonN7 wrote...

BurningLiquor wrote...

theillusiveman11 wrote...

This thread, in reference to the newb friendly thread.


The newb-friendly thread was a troll thread and was locked.


I would take this thread out for an expensive dinner.:wub:



And you wouldn't take me?!?!?! :crying:


Nah it's not like that I swear, yunno I love ya baby!:innocent:

#1603
DarkFaerie316

DarkFaerie316
  • Members
  • 2 689 messages

CrimsonN7 wrote...

ifritanshiva wrote...

CrimsonN7 wrote...

BurningLiquor wrote...

theillusiveman11 wrote...

This thread, in reference to the newb friendly thread.


The newb-friendly thread was a troll thread and was locked.


I would take this thread out for an expensive dinner.:wub:



And you wouldn't take me?!?!?! :crying:


Nah it's not like that I swear, yunno I love ya baby!:innocent:



:D:D  I know sweetie lol

#1604
Bryan Johnson

Bryan Johnson
  • BioWare Employees
  • 4 042 messages
This topic is not for a telephone game

This is a warning

#1605
BurningLiquor

BurningLiquor
  • Members
  • 3 356 messages

Bryan Johnson wrote...

This topic is not for a telephone game

This is a warning


Bryan you should just lock this thread. It was dead anyway. Got necro'd for no purpose at all.

#1606
CmnDwnWrkn

CmnDwnWrkn
  • Members
  • 4 336 messages

BurningLiquor wrote...

Bryan Johnson wrote...

This topic is not for a telephone game

This is a warning


Bryan you should just lock this thread. It was dead anyway. Got necro'd for no purpose at all.


This post is SO not fabulous <_<

#1607
BurningLiquor

BurningLiquor
  • Members
  • 3 356 messages

CmnDwnWrkn wrote...

BurningLiquor wrote...

Bryan Johnson wrote...

This topic is not for a telephone game

This is a warning


Bryan you should just lock this thread. It was dead anyway. Got necro'd for no purpose at all.


This post is SO not fabulous <_<


I lol'd. :lol:

#1608
Pablo Cavalieri

Pablo Cavalieri
  • Members
  • 178 messages
This thread are so pink, so heterophobic lol
You need gaypeeps in a game?...lol get a life for this.

#1609
YIRAWK

YIRAWK
  • Members
  • 684 messages
I REVIVE THIS THREAD!!!

#1610
Imperator_Prime

Imperator_Prime
  • Members
  • 297 messages
Imperator Prime on xbl, got a mic.


For all the people saying "what's the use of a thread like this," seemingly oblivious to online homophobia, here's a really basic explanation. Whether we use it or not, whether we limit ourselves to it or not, some of us appreciate a "safe list" of people we can play online with so that if we get talking about our offline lives over the mic (as plenty of people do) we don't have to put up with childish ****s yelling "****" if we mention, for example, our significant other.

It's not so much about "shared interests"-- just because I'm gay doesn't mean that I want to chat with other gay guys about stereotypically 'gay interests' crap like interior design and fashion-- it's about making your experience online more agreeable by selecting a peer group (which is everyone's prerogative) that you can reasonably expect not to treat you like bigoted jagoffs. And while I haven't run into a lot of those, I have PUGed with some in the past. I'd like to hedge my bets against getting them again.

Frankly I think it would be much better to have a "name & shame the racist/sexist/homophobic douchebags" thread where, instead of treating the agreeable people as the exception, we published a list of the disagreeable people we encounter online so that anyone who wants to avoid them can... what? Does xbox or any of the other systems support "ignore lists" and PUG exclusion of the people on them? If not, then maybe this kind of "looking for X" thread is the best we can do.

But the point remains, if you're in the privileged position of never having felt discriminated against or slandered online-- not for how you play but for who you are-- then you aren't fit to judge the selective grouping behaviour of people who aren't. There are in fact plenty of ignorant, hateful idiots online and nobody who prefers to avoid them owes anyone else an explanation or an apology. If you aren't one of those unpleasant people then by all means, join the "in group," but don't make excuses for them or pretend that they aren't out there, because it's unjust to everyone who's encountered them and had a lousy time of it.

Modifié par Imperator_Prime, 24 décembre 2012 - 05:19 .


#1611
Cole Jones

Cole Jones
  • Members
  • 533 messages
Huh Interesting thread, No I'm not gay but i really hate Homophobes.

#1612
Felhand

Felhand
  • Members
  • 1 295 messages
Cause if someone wants a big pink batarian they can damnit, on a unrelated note what the hell is a "telephone game"?

#1613
Guest_Rubios_*

Guest_Rubios_*
  • Guests
Anyone for U/U/P right now?

#1614
SOMETHING_FOR_NOTHING

SOMETHING_FOR_NOTHING
  • Members
  • 2 189 messages

Felhand wrote...

Cause if someone wants a big pink batarian they can damnit, on a unrelated note what the hell is a "telephone game"?




WHEN I WAS in school k-5

all the students would sit together to form a circle about 20-30 kids one kid would whisper anything to the next student ear and that kids would do the same until it came back to the original kid...then the kid would stand up and repeat what was said to him USUALLy its pretty hilarious.

For example...i would say potato, and usually i would get something like "so and so person has a crush on so and so person who likes to take so-so person out for a patato date"

#1615
spudspot

spudspot
  • Members
  • 2 447 messages

Imperator_Prime wrote...

Frankly I think it would be much better to have a "name & shame the racist/sexist/homophobic douchebags" thread where, instead of treating the agreeable people as the exception, we published a list of the disagreeable people we encounter online so that anyone who wants to avoid them can... what?


If you want to play with people who share certain characteristics with you, then feel free to open a thread or post one like you are doing now. That's entirely ok, though not everybody seems to get why you would want to play with somebody you actually enjoy talking to - for whatever reason. 

Naming and shaming people is an irritating concept however, there's the report function for that. There has also been a thread around here where XBLers had a contest about who had the most negative reputation, so such a system doesn't seem to work as intended at all...

#1616
Felhand

Felhand
  • Members
  • 1 295 messages

SOMETHING_FOR_NOTHING wrote...

Felhand wrote...

Cause if someone wants a big pink batarian they can damnit, on a unrelated note what the hell is a "telephone game"?




WHEN I WAS in school k-5

all the students would sit together to form a circle about 20-30 kids one kid would whisper anything to the next student ear and that kids would do the same until it came back to the original kid...then the kid would stand up and repeat what was said to him USUALLy its pretty hilarious.

For example...i would say potato, and usually i would get something like "so and so person has a crush on so and so person who likes to take so-so person out for a patato date"





So basically what your saying is in prehistoric times word of mouth was not known for its consistency , check.

:P

#1617
Kogia

Kogia
  • Members
  • 1 156 messages

Imperator_Prime wrote...

Imperator Prime on xbl, got a mic.


For all the people saying "what's the use of a thread like this," seemingly oblivious to online homophobia, here's a really basic explanation. Whether we use it or not, whether we limit ourselves to it or not, some of us appreciate a "safe list" of people we can play online with so that if we get talking about our offline lives over the mic (as plenty of people do) we don't have to put up with childish ****s yelling "****" if we mention, for example, our significant other.

It's not so much about "shared interests"-- just because I'm gay doesn't mean that I want to chat with other gay guys about stereotypically 'gay interests' crap like interior design and fashion-- it's about making your experience online more agreeable by selecting a peer group (which is everyone's prerogative) that you can reasonably expect not to treat you like bigoted jagoffs. And while I haven't run into a lot of those, I have PUGed with some in the past. I'd like to hedge my bets against getting them again.

Frankly I think it would be much better to have a "name & shame the racist/sexist/homophobic douchebags" thread where, instead of treating the agreeable people as the exception, we published a list of the disagreeable people we encounter online so that anyone who wants to avoid them can... what? Does xbox or any of the other systems support "ignore lists" and PUG exclusion of the people on them? If not, then maybe this kind of "looking for X" thread is the best we can do.

But the point remains, if you're in the privileged position of never having felt discriminated against or slandered online-- not for how you play but for who you are-- then you aren't fit to judge the selective grouping behaviour of people who aren't. There are in fact plenty of ignorant, hateful idiots online and nobody who prefers to avoid them owes anyone else an explanation or an apology. If you aren't one of those unpleasant people then by all means, join the "in group," but don't make excuses for them or pretend that they aren't out there, because it's unjust to everyone who's encountered them and had a lousy time of it.



Nice well written explanation, if anyone else pops in to act displeased or confused about the point of the thread, direct them to this.

#1618
SOMETHING_FOR_NOTHING

SOMETHING_FOR_NOTHING
  • Members
  • 2 189 messages

Felhand wrote...

SOMETHING_FOR_NOTHING wrote...

Felhand wrote...

Cause if someone wants a big pink batarian they can damnit, on a unrelated note what the hell is a "telephone game"?




WHEN I WAS in school k-5

all the students would sit together to form a circle about 20-30 kids one kid would whisper anything to the next student ear and that kids would do the same until it came back to the original kid...then the kid would stand up and repeat what was said to him USUALLy its pretty hilarious.

For example...i would say potato, and usually i would get something like "so and so person has a crush on so and so person who likes to take so-so person out for a patato date"





So basically what your saying is in prehistoric times word of mouth was not known for its consistency , check.

:P


PREtty much, we would do this all the time for gym class before we started to play and stuff

#1619
Shephard-Commander909

Shephard-Commander909
  • Members
  • 260 messages
I am (so far as i know) straight but I hate homophobes so much it's as bad as racism or sexism in my opinion.

#1620
GeneralMoskvin_2.0

GeneralMoskvin_2.0
  • Members
  • 2 611 messages
Image IPB

Oops, I mean....

Image IPB

#1621
NoForgiveness

NoForgiveness
  • Members
  • 2 538 messages
hey one my best friends is gay... or he was my friend until i moved halfway across the country... but still!

#1622
born2beagator

born2beagator
  • Members
  • 3 082 messages

BurningLiquor wrote...

Bryan Johnson wrote...

This topic is not for a telephone game

This is a warning


Bryan you should just lock this thread. It was dead anyway. Got necro'd for no purpose at all.


Do you have any idea the $%^&storm the people on this thread would create if they closed this?

#1623
xyzmkrysvr

xyzmkrysvr
  • Members
  • 813 messages

BurningLiquor wrote...
Bryan you should just lock this thread. It was dead anyway. Got necro'd for no purpose at all.


False. It was just hibernating - it needed some beauty sleep. :P

Glad to see there's renewed interest in this thread! Since it's been "necro'd" I've been contacted by several new players who support the goal and purpose of this thread. I've already played several matches with some of them and am looking forward to more =) 

#1624
billy the squid

billy the squid
  • Members
  • 4 669 messages

Imperator_Prime wrote...

Imperator Prime on xbl, got a mic.


For all the people saying "what's the use of a thread like this," seemingly oblivious to online homophobia, here's a really basic explanation. Whether we use it or not, whether we limit ourselves to it or not, some of us appreciate a "safe list" of people we can play online with so that if we get talking about our offline lives over the mic (as plenty of people do) we don't have to put up with childish ****s yelling "****" if we mention, for example, our significant other.

It's not so much about "shared interests"-- just because I'm gay doesn't mean that I want to chat with other gay guys about stereotypically 'gay interests' crap like interior design and fashion-- it's about making your experience online more agreeable by selecting a peer group (which is everyone's prerogative) that you can reasonably expect not to treat you like bigoted jagoffs. And while I haven't run into a lot of those, I have PUGed with some in the past. I'd like to hedge my bets against getting them again.

Frankly I think it would be much better to have a "name & shame the racist/sexist/homophobic douchebags" thread where, instead of treating the agreeable people as the exception, we published a list of the disagreeable people we encounter online so that anyone who wants to avoid them can... what? Does xbox or any of the other systems support "ignore lists" and PUG exclusion of the people on them? If not, then maybe this kind of "looking for X" thread is the best we can do.

But the point remains, if you're in the privileged position of never having felt discriminated against or slandered online-- not for how you play but for who you are-- then you aren't fit to judge the selective grouping behaviour of people who aren't. There are in fact plenty of ignorant, hateful idiots online and nobody who prefers to avoid them owes anyone else an explanation or an apology. If you aren't one of those unpleasant people then by all means, join the "in group," but don't make excuses for them or pretend that they aren't out there, because it's unjust to everyone who's encountered them and had a lousy time of it.


So, do you advertise your sexual prefrence online? Because that just screams attention wh0re and you're likely to be abused because you conciously drew attention to it, especially if the person is homophobic. If not, then how the hell do they know? More likely it's the typical juvinille or tongue in cheek insults thrown for no reason other than because they can. Nothing more satisfying than trolling the douchebags. The reactor hazard exists for a reason.

#1625
born2beagator

born2beagator
  • Members
  • 3 082 messages

xyzmkrysvr wrote...

BurningLiquor wrote...
Bryan you should just lock this thread. It was dead anyway. Got necro'd for no purpose at all.


False. It was just hibernating - it needed some beauty sleep. :P

Glad to see there's renewed interest in this thread! Since it's been "necro'd" I've been contacted by several new players who support the goal and purpose of this thread. I've already played several matches with some of them and am looking forward to more =) 


Actually if you look at the post that bumped it, it had nothing to do with the purpose of the thread.  

Modifié par born2beagator, 24 décembre 2012 - 06:25 .