Aller au contenu

Photo

Why the Indoctrination theory doesn't work


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
249 réponses à ce sujet

#101
Smiley556

Smiley556
  • Members
  • 578 messages

MustacheManatee wrote...

Entire forums worth of observations, and evidence vs "The VI didn't detect him", and "you are wrong".


Dont forget the magic answer to everything: "Plotholes"
Its making it really hard to debate. As I said in another thread, "Plotholes" is to the god kid space magic theory what "God" is to creationism. The answer to everything because it always fits and cant be proven or disproven.

#102
MustacheManatee

MustacheManatee
  • Members
  • 266 messages
Scene by scene analysis of the ending.
Don't let Harbinger trick you!
http://social.biowar...5/index/9897684

#103
Naarad

Naarad
  • Members
  • 73 messages

Urumashi wrote...

MustacheManatee wrote...

Entire forums worth of observations, and evidence vs "The VI didn't detect him", and "you are wrong".


Head smashingly frustrating, i know. We've been counteracting people and trying to spread the theories for days, at some point it feels almost as progressive as trying to get the council to help you with something.


That alone should be the proof that, sadly, the idea is just that, an idea. You argue people has become enamored with whatever they didn't like about the ending, but you don't seem to be able to assume that perhaps you've ended enamored of the indoctrination idea exactly because you, too, refuse to accept the ending. 

#104
Urumashi

Urumashi
  • Members
  • 133 messages

mereck7980 wrote...

This entire point is moot, IMHO, because when you get to the end you a choice to counter the Reapers stated goals.

What other person has ever had a choice be indoctrinated? They just are. You don't have to pick Control or Synthesis. You can choose Destroy. Nothing in the ME lore leads me to believe that Indoctrination is that open ended.

BTW, the state of Shepard's indoctrination is irrelevant in at least a third of the endings because the Reapers all die.

It seems like people have been grasping at straws because they were shocked by how bad the endings are, so they are trying to figure out some way to justify what they have just witnessed.


Why is it that every person that tries to counter-argue the theories always uses one or both of the phrases "IMHO" or "grasping at straws"

The illusion of choice is the whole point, shep doesnt know he's indoctrinated, noone ever KNOWS they are indoctrinated, that's what makes it indoctrination and not mind controll. That's why you can convince seren to blow his own brains out. You don't actually pick an option to destory the reapers because you are never actually on the citadel to begin with, each choice is a reflection of shepard's mental battle with the reapers, the winning option being the destroy option because it goes against everything the reapers work for, thus the "wakeing up" bit at the end.

#105
Nightshade386

Nightshade386
  • Members
  • 88 messages

Naarad wrote...

You deny the endings to support the Indoctrination theory. But if that was really what was going on, believe me, the writers would have put plausible, easy to understand, proof of that being the case. That's not the case, they actually go all the way to show you indoctrination... on TIM.


Sorry man, not true.  I played though all of Knights of the Old Republic without a CLUE that I was Darth Revan, and in retrospect, the clues were there....I just wasn't looking for them.  This is why, despite my intintial "what the heck was that?!?!?" reaction, I now feel like the Indoctrination theory makes sense.  Bioware has done this to us before.  Just not right at the end, with no real closure.  If true, it's a cliffhanger.

FYI, It's cool not being alright with that.  It's cool not believing it yourself.  But until we hear from Bioware, it's hard to say one answer or the other is right or wrong.

#106
MustacheManatee

MustacheManatee
  • Members
  • 266 messages
I absolutely accept the ending and will be totally fine with it if it's just left open to interpretation. I think it was a great ending. My motivation to uncover information is not driven by a misplaced rage about the end. It just gives me a chance to nerd out on more Mass Effect. To be honest, I was skeptical at first too. Then I found a wealth of evidence and information that is quite compelling.

#107
NomadDC

NomadDC
  • Members
  • 130 messages

savionen wrote...

The only counter to the indoctrination theory is that it was all just "bad writing".

-Why is Commander Shepard the only one that pays attention to the vent boy? It seems like Anderson can't see him.
-Why does the vent boy say "You can't save me" when you first see him?
-Why does God Kid say "Wake up" softly instead of "Why are you here!?" if you have a high EMS score.
-How did the kid survive through a vent that says it's an electrical hazard?
-How did the kid survive even though he was in a building that got destroyed by Reapers?
-Why doesn't anyone help the kid get onto the shuttle? They completely ignore him. One of the guards is actually pointing his gun in the direction of the kid for a few seconds.
-Why is the vent boy also the god kid?
-Why is Shepard so jarred by this one kid even though he killed hundreds of thousands of batarians (including children)?



Yeah, awesome list, I got them all on mine.
Also can add:
-no more kids in-game (weak fact though)
-Harbringer-like voice in background, when at the top (??) of citadel
-There is no lght-magic elevators in cidatel, period.
-Shepard need oxigen to live, we found it out in ME2 (beginning)
-As well as he will die in vacuum w/o his armor (same place as previous)
-At some point, EDI says that Shepard is stressed much more, than even during Skyllian Blitz on Elisium (where he became hero in War hero biography)
-Shepard wakes up in London in one piece (ME2 tells us, that if he actually was on citadel, he wouldn't be in one piece anymore)
-Whole Shepard-TIM-Anderson scene looks like some kind of dream/hallucination (we can see some black image defects up there, they reminds me black figures from dreams)
-Voice in dreams sugeests Shepard to flee/give up/surrender/etc.
-Read indoctrination codex entry
-Also read Reapers weaknesses entry, they are not that badass hard to kill as we think.

#108
Urumashi

Urumashi
  • Members
  • 133 messages

Naarad wrote...

Urumashi wrote...

MustacheManatee wrote...

Entire forums worth of observations, and evidence vs "The VI didn't detect him", and "you are wrong".


Head smashingly frustrating, i know. We've been counteracting people and trying to spread the theories for days, at some point it feels almost as progressive as trying to get the council to help you with something.


That alone should be the proof that, sadly, the idea is just that, an idea. You argue people has become enamored with whatever they didn't like about the ending, but you don't seem to be able to assume that perhaps you've ended enamored of the indoctrination idea exactly because you, too, refuse to accept the ending. 


Ya know..i'm not a huge grammar natzi....but when you frak up so bad i can't even understand what you're saying..i have to draw the line. Can anyone translate what he just said for me, because i would be happy to respond given i could understand the premise.

"but you don't seem to be able to assume that perhaps you've ended enamored of the indoctrination idea exactly because you, too, refuse to accept the ending.  " lol

#109
Holoe4

Holoe4
  • Members
  • 613 messages
But there's so much evidence... so many plot-holes... It would clarify so much.

#110
Smiley556

Smiley556
  • Members
  • 578 messages

Naarad wrote...

Urumashi wrote...

MustacheManatee wrote...

Entire forums worth of observations, and evidence vs "The VI didn't detect him", and "you are wrong".


Head smashingly frustrating, i know. We've been counteracting people and trying to spread the theories for days, at some point it feels almost as progressive as trying to get the council to help you with something.


That alone should be the proof that, sadly, the idea is just that, an idea. You argue people has become enamored with whatever they didn't like about the ending, but you don't seem to be able to assume that perhaps you've ended enamored of the indoctrination idea exactly because you, too, refuse to accept the ending. 


You do realise there are plenty people, including me, who figured this one out on their own, and only had it confirmed by the forum right? Why would I refuse to accept the ending at any point if I figured out it was a hallucination the moment I played it the first time?

#111
Malanek

Malanek
  • Members
  • 7 838 messages

Naarad wrote...

While I understand there's plenty of people that just plain hate the ending in all its forms since the moment the Catalyst comes up, let's put this clear (IMO):

A theory that has as many assumptions and  outside justifications going around to give it sense is as bad as the ending itself for the lack of context.

If you bend it enough, you could even justify that Shepard is in fact a unicorn. Really, you can hate the ending all you want, but making up a whole justification that is based on one assumption after the other doesn't really give it validity.

It's a cool theory, I'll give you that, but sadly it lacks as much proof as the actual ending does lack context.

:blink:I came into this thread looking for a counter-proof and found the first post doesn't actually match the thread title. I expected the words "Why" and "doesn't" to be explained but they were completely ignored. 

#112
MustacheManatee

MustacheManatee
  • Members
  • 266 messages
What smiley556 said.

#113
Astarmos

Astarmos
  • Members
  • 100 messages
BTW for all those bringing up "SPACE MAGIC" : Citadel and mass relays themselves are "SPACE MAGIC". Protheans were able to build a mass relay which was one-way and a mako could be transmitted. So imagine how smart were the builders of Citadel and mass relays. For a human they are "SPACE MAGIC" and you don't need the Catalyst to see this.

#114
Nefelius

Nefelius
  • Members
  • 604 messages
I like how these theorists guys just blatanlty deny the lack of facts that prove their nonsense and make it all from piecing together their own speculation.
I like how they deny that even if after-vi-section-shepard-could-be-indoctrinated there are NO facts that lead to it.

Harbinjer shoots a big main gun laser to kill you? - INDOCTRINATIOOOOOON!

Anderson did not see the kid, ignoring the fact that he could not in any way see him from the angle he stood - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!

How come shepard live only in red option that spacebaby wizard gives you, ignoring the fact that u just cant be possibly alive after desintegration in other two magical choices, and tho u certainly can survive a blast - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!

The spacebabywizard telsl you not to pick a red pill, ignoring the fact that he does not, just hints that even if you do pick red it might result in war after all - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!

Spacebabywizard tells you that you will die after taking the red pill but you dont, ignoring the fact that he says only "even you are partly synthetic" - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!

Prothean VI is a phony liar - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!

Modifié par Nefelius, 14 mars 2012 - 08:31 .


#115
Smiley556

Smiley556
  • Members
  • 578 messages

Malanek999 wrote...

Naarad wrote...

While I understand there's plenty of people that just plain hate the ending in all its forms since the moment the Catalyst comes up, let's put this clear (IMO):

A theory that has as many assumptions and  outside justifications going around to give it sense is as bad as the ending itself for the lack of context.

If you bend it enough, you could even justify that Shepard is in fact a unicorn. Really, you can hate the ending all you want, but making up a whole justification that is based on one assumption after the other doesn't really give it validity.

It's a cool theory, I'll give you that, but sadly it lacks as much proof as the actual ending does lack context.

:blink:I came into this thread looking for a counter-proof and found the first post doesn't actually match the thread title. I expected the words "Why" and "doesn't" to be explained but they were completely ignored. 


Wishfull thinking, I'm afraid its just more 'you are wrong cause I say so', as all threads like these seem to be.

Modifié par Smiley556, 14 mars 2012 - 08:33 .


#116
MustacheManatee

MustacheManatee
  • Members
  • 266 messages
True. Magic is usually just science we don't understand yet. How does this counteract the indoctrination theory?

#117
Astarmos

Astarmos
  • Members
  • 100 messages

MustacheManatee wrote...

True. Magic is usually just science we don't understand yet. How does this counteract the indoctrination theory?

The whole Catalyst scene and the result of it is considered "SPACE MAGIC" and it is commonly used as the proof for indoctrination hypothesis - "it couldn't happen! SPACE MAGIC"

#118
Smiley556

Smiley556
  • Members
  • 578 messages

Astarmos wrote...

MustacheManatee wrote...

True. Magic is usually just science we don't understand yet. How does this counteract the indoctrination theory?

The whole Catalyst scene and the result of it is considered "SPACE MAGIC" and it is commonly used as the proof for indoctrination hypothesis - "it couldn't happen! SPACE MAGIC"


If you think this is the only evidence you clearly havent read a single indoctrination explenation. And the reason we refer to it as space magic is because bloody well everybody refers to it as space magic. We didnt come up with that wording, the people who hate the ending at face value did.

Modifié par Smiley556, 14 mars 2012 - 08:35 .


#119
MustacheManatee

MustacheManatee
  • Members
  • 266 messages
Ok I agree with you that that is stupid. There are far better facts to support the theory.

http://social.biowar...5/index/9897684

#120
Plasma Prestige

Plasma Prestige
  • Members
  • 295 messages
 The theory has more credibility than your opinion because I've seen it well supported. Saying the other theory is wrong is meaningless without showing some deconstruction of the argument point by point.

#121
Thorem

Thorem
  • Members
  • 8 messages

Nefelius wrote...

I like how these theorists guys just blatanlty deny the lack of facts that prove their nonsense and make it all from piecing together their own speculation.
I like how they deny that even if after-vi-section-shepard-could-be-indoctrinated there are NO facts that lead to it.

Harbinjer shoots a big main gun laser to kill you? - INDOCTRINATIOOOOOON!

Anderson did not see the kid, ignoring the fact that he could not in any way see him from the angle he stood - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!

How come shepard live only in red option that spacebaby wizard gives you, ignoring the fact that u just cant be possibly alive after desintegration in other two magical choices, and tho u certainly can survive a blast - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!

The spacebabywizard telsl you not to pick a red pill, ignoring the fact that he does not, just hints that even if you do pick red it might result in war after all - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!

Spacebabywizard tells you that you will die after taking the red pill but you dont, ignoring the fact that he says only "even you are partly synthetic" - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!

Prothean VI is a phony liar - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!


you sound like a moron

#122
Astarmos

Astarmos
  • Members
  • 100 messages

Smiley556 wrote...

Astarmos wrote...

MustacheManatee wrote...

True. Magic is usually just science we don't understand yet. How does this counteract the indoctrination theory?

The whole Catalyst scene and the result of it is considered "SPACE MAGIC" and it is commonly used as the proof for indoctrination hypothesis - "it couldn't happen! SPACE MAGIC"


If you think this is the only evidence you clearly havent read a single indoctrination explenation. And the reason we refer to it as space magic is because bloody well everybody refers to it as space magic. We didnt come up with that wording, the people who hate the ending at face value did.

I said, it's commonly used, i didn't say it is the only one

#123
Reign Tsumiraki

Reign Tsumiraki
  • Members
  • 789 messages

Astarmos wrote...

Everything after you got hit by prothean beacon on Eden Prime is an illusion, a dream. Prove me wrong.


Well, actually, this entire game was just a story, told by an old man to a small child.

#124
Nefelius

Nefelius
  • Members
  • 604 messages

nedimlive wrote...

Nefelius wrote...

I like how these theorists guys just blatanlty deny the lack of facts that prove their nonsense and make it all from piecing together their own speculation.
I like how they deny that even if after-vi-section-shepard-could-be-indoctrinated there are NO facts that lead to it.

Harbinjer shoots a big main gun laser to kill you? - INDOCTRINATIOOOOOON!

Anderson did not see the kid, ignoring the fact that he could not in any way see him from the angle he stood - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!

How come shepard live only in red option that spacebaby wizard gives you, ignoring the fact that u just cant be possibly alive after desintegration in other two magical choices, and tho u certainly can survive a blast - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!

The spacebabywizard telsl you not to pick a red pill, ignoring the fact that he does not, just hints that even if you do pick red it might result in war after all - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!

Spacebabywizard tells you that you will die after taking the red pill but you dont, ignoring the fact that he says only "even you are partly synthetic" - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!

Prothean VI is a phony liar - INDOCTRINATIOOOOON!


you sound like a moron


That's the point.

#125
Urumashi

Urumashi
  • Members
  • 133 messages
Smiley556, You're one of the few others on this particular thread that seems to be willing to actually stand up for the theory and provide evidence as to why, for this i thank you. Endlessly. I'm leaving you in charge now, i'm going to go eat something since i've been trying to set these people down a decent path for the past 4 hours to effectively no avail. Happy hunting.