48 réponses à ce sujet

[Walrusninja]

Wow, you slay those stereotypes!

[III Mav III]

Nightshade386 wrote...

III Mav III wrote...

I thought she had an ugly face too, you would have thought that they would know how to create human faces by now...hell they could copy an actual human face like they did with Miranda, it may create better results

They did copy a human face.  It's Jessica Chobot of IGN.

That was a joke.

[gotthammer]

I was personally fine w/ Allers/Chobot. If anything, I wish there were more dialogue options w/ her character.

Is she really a 'romance' option?

[Skirata129]

JeanLuc Awesome wrote...

GnusmasTHX wrote...

No that'd be too realistic given her VA.

Whew her voice acting.....wow was that bad. 

for a second I thought you had said VD.

[Banzboy]

Why did they give the option to kick her off the ship? It seemed kinda pointless since you could just say no to her or just ignore her completely.

[Marixus99.9]

Banzboy wrote...

Why did they give the option to kick her off the ship? It seemed kinda pointless since you could just say no to her or just ignore her completely.

Apparently Bioware cares more about minor choices than ending choices ..

[hunterdan1992]

SLPr0 wrote...

Wait..why would you even want to have sex with that? If I saw something that looked like Diana Allers standing on the street I'd cross the street to avoid any potential airborne transmission STDs.

:sick: This...

[Malanek]

I thought her voice acting was OK. She didn't have the best lines out of any character. Who is the real person anyway? Don't think I have ever heard of her. Minor actress?

[gotthammer]

Malanek999 wrote...

I thought her voice acting was OK. She didn't have the best lines out of any character. Who is the real person anyway? Don't think I have ever heard of her. Minor actress?

IGN game reporter person thingy

[mgoss]

She was a very small part of the game. Not enough to make it bad or change the quality of it.

[durasteel]

emp6 wrote...

I think she is more an advertiser for IGN to fullfill nerd fantasies than an journalist. She's not famous for doing her job well, she's is famous for licking PSPs in underwear.

That's her job, and she did it well. She presents game related media with sex appeal... duh.

She's hotter than you are. Don't hate.

[zimm2142]

Never have sex with a reporter, never go near a reporter. Have you not seen Thank You For Smoking ?

[Lexagg]

durasteel wrote...

emp6 wrote...

I think she is more an advertiser for IGN to fullfill nerd fantasies than an journalist. She's not famous for doing her job well, she's is famous for licking PSPs in underwear.

That's her job, and she did it well. She presents game related media with sex appeal... duh.

She's hotter than you are. Don't hate.

Her VA was the worst in the entire game. It felt like she was just reading the lines from the paper, without any acting involved. In fact, she pretty much admitted to being a ****ty voice actress.

[Jake71887]

I'd have sex with Chobot... I don't have very high standards  

[zimm2142]

durasteel wrote...

emp6 wrote...

I think she is more an advertiser for IGN to fullfill nerd fantasies than an journalist. She's not famous for doing her job well, she's is famous for licking PSPs in underwear.

That's her job, and she did it well. She presents game related media with sex appeal... duh.

She's hotter than you are. Don't hate.

I hate because her performance damages the virtual world I see in Mass Effect 3.
I hate her because I hate IGN for their bias.
I hate her because I can't punch her.
Someone being better/more sucessful at something then you does not protect them from criticism, if it did, we would have no reviews as very few reviewers can make a better game/movie then the people who did it in the first place. 
HOLD THE LINE!!

[BigBubbaBacon]

Kilshrek wrote...

... not sure if serious ...

I used her for her media connections.

My Male Shepard used her for the same thing.


Oh...wait...you were talking about her being a reporter. Nevermind.

Nothing to see here, folks.

[durasteel]

zimm2142 wrote...

I hate because her performance damages the virtual world I see in Mass Effect 3.
I hate her because I hate IGN for their bias.
I hate her because I can't punch her.
Someone being better/more sucessful at something then you does not protect them from criticism, if it did, we would have no reviews as very few reviewers can make a better game/movie then the people who did it in the first place. 
HOLD THE LINE!!

Her performance was perfect. Allers is a focus-group tested correspondent hired by ANN to present the news of the war in an appealing way - she actually tells you this if you talk to her. Chabot is perfect for the role, because that is who she is. With the exception of nailing her source, Allers is Chabot. Like the character or not, you can't say it was an unrealistic performance.

Chabot isn't IGN, she just works for them. Their bias is no more her fault than the festering turd of an ending to ME3 is the fault of Chris Priestly.

Who do you want to punch, Allers or Chabot? You're less wrong for wanting to punch Allers (since she's not real) but still... you want to be that guy? Seem like your issues go way beyond IGN or a cute on-screen personality.

Not saying any of the above should protect anyone from criticism, as long as it is reasonable criticism. Chabot and Allers are both focus group tested talking heads. You might find it objectionable to use sex appeal to drive tech show (or "Battlespace") ratings, and that's legitimate criticism. Hating on Chabot because she got an awesome job for being cute, articulate, and willing to prance around in her underwear is bull crap, though, because you know you would have jumped at that opportunity if it had been offered to you.

I guess my point is that while Allers is a digital character, Chabot is not. She has doubtless thousands of horney fanboys who would love to stalk her if given half a chance, and I'm sure she's really not going to get her feelings hurt over your insults, but still... We should have the basic decency to keep our personal criticism honest and appropriate.

Modifié par durasteel, 15 mars 2012 - 04:41 .

[Militarized]

HIT IT THEN QUIT IT.

Kind of like the ending. O.O

IT ALL CIRCLES BACK.

[Mabari Owns High Dragon The 2nd]

I don't get why Shepherd needs multiple strippers and aliens to bed.. The relationship part was good but the Kelly and this stuff is just overboard...

Modifié par Mabari Owns High Dragon The 2nd, 15 mars 2012 - 04:47 .

[D58]

Banzboy wrote...

Why did they give the option to kick her off the ship? It seemed kinda pointless since you could just say no to her or just ignore her completely.

I think it would have been hilarious if you could actualy see shepard kicking her off at citadel and then throwing her bags out

[zimm2142]

durasteel wrote...

zimm2142 wrote...

I hate because her performance damages the virtual world I see in Mass Effect 3.
I hate her because I hate IGN for their bias.
I hate her because I can't punch her.
Someone being better/more sucessful at something then you does not protect them from criticism, if it did, we would have no reviews as very few reviewers can make a better game/movie then the people who did it in the first place. 
HOLD THE LINE!!

Her performance was perfect. Allers is a focus-group tested correspondent hired by ANN to present the news of the war in an appealing way - she actually tells you this if you talk to her. Chabot is perfect for the role, because that is who she is. With the exception of nailing her source, Allers is Chabot. Like the character or not, you can't say it was an unrealistic performance.

Chabot isn't IGN, she just works for them. Their bias is no more her fault than the festering turd of an ending to ME3 is the fault of Chris Priestly.

Who do you want to punch, Allers or Chabot? You're less wrong for wanting to punch Allers (since she's not real) but still... you want to be that guy? Seem like your issues go way beyond IGN or a cute on-screen personality.

Not saying any of the above should protect anyone from criticism, as long as it is reasonable criticism. Chabot and Allers are both focus group tested talking heads. You might find it objectionable to use sex appeal to drive tech show (or "Battlespace") ratings, and that's legitimate criticism. Hating on Chabot because she got an awesome job for being cute, articulate, and willing to prance around in her underwear is bull crap, though, because you know you would have jumped at that opportunity if it had been offered to you.

I guess my point is that while Allers is a digital character, Chabot is not. She has doubtless thousands of horney fanboys who would love to stalk her if given half a chance, and I'm sure she's really not going to get her feelings hurt over your insults, but still... We should have the basic decency to keep our personal criticism honest and appropriate.

I would not punch Chobot IRL, that would be harmful/violent, would never want to do that. 
And you are correct actually, it is realistic, does not make the preformance better, but it is realistic. 

[vx SmOkEy xv]

"Hey commander I really enjoyed last night"
"GET OFF MY SHIP"

[Fl1xx]

Meer and Chobot? I can see that.

"Wow. You . Are. The. Best. I've. Had. Shepard."

"ALLEEEEERS"

[eveelClown]

Jessica Chobot is good looking and Diana Allers is not.