Went back to review the endings. Don't know what to think of the Indoctrination theory now.
In a way, most details seem so well crafted that after proper examination, it is almost undeniable. The ghostly plants and trees from Shepard's dreams after he gets hit by the beam, the male and female shepard voices ringing alongside the Catalyst's, the slight change in music when you walk towards the synthesis/control OR destroy ending, the change in paragon/renegade colors to confuse the player, the awkward echoing of sounds, the "Last breath" cutscene in the destroy ending, etc...
All that points towards the theory being true or at least very close to the truth.
But then, there's the existence of the normandy crash and stargazer cutscenes and the "Shepard has become a legend by ENDING THE REAPER MENACE" message at the end. Why would that be there?
Maybe it could be a way of covering the actual cliffhanger, but I don't know.
What I think is that Mac and the team wouldn't create so many plot holes and contradictions in the ending of such an important franchise just like that. Perhaps they had an idea for a more majestic ending and needed more dev time, so they went this route.
Wait and see, we must. If all this turns out to be true, I'll bow my head and let them take my money.
EDIT: Another possibly meaningless, but interesting thing is that the guys at the Mass Effect twitter answered every single one of my questions, no matter how outrageous (which were a lot) right until I asked them about the Indoctrination Theory.
Modifié par xFyre1, 21 mars 2012 - 01:31 .