I loved every second of it up until the last ten minutes or so. My only quibble was going to be the confusing quest journal.
Just a small sample of what I loved: The whole mission on Tuchanka was brilliant from start to finish. The flashlight sequences with the tinge of survival horror feeling were creepy as hell. I loved seeing the ancient krogan art and architecture (of
course they worshipped the queen of the thresher maws!). Seeing a sand worm take down a reaper was fantastic, and, as EDI pointed out, demonstrated that the reapers could be beaten by the technologically inferior. Mordin's death made me cry--the first time a video game has ever done that. His death was sad, but emotionally satisfying. I loved Eve. She gave me hope that the krogan people could find their cultural renaissance.
All of the crew interaction, either with each other or with Shepard, were incredibly fun. I loved that they wandered around the Normandy or the Citadel and talked to each other. The strong, well-developed characters is one of the main reasons I replay the ME games. I really liked seeing all the surviving crew from ME2 (and yeah, I played a 'perfect' mission for my import, so I would see them all). I liked how they added to your assets, making me even happier I got them through the Suicide Mission.
The resolution to the quarian and geth conflict. I was able to talk both sides down and bring peace between them. That was one of the most satisfying moments I've had in all three games. I had loved Legion in ME2, and I cried for his sacrifice in ME3. I came out of those missions hopeful that the quarians and geth would grow together in peace and cooperation.
And why the ending was dissatisfying:All in all, I went into the endgame with a lot more hope than I had expected to. We knew a reaper weak spot, their 'eye' when open, and we'd seen a lowly--if immense--worm defeat one. Heck, we can take down a reaper with just the Cain during the London battle.
I liked being able to talk the Illusive Man into shooting himself--it was a poetic nod to Saren and felt like something Shepard could do.
Then the Catalyst appears and the game lost me. It was an abrupt shift in tone and genre. (One example I've read is: it's like ending Star Wars with the ending for 2001. Both good movies, both ostensibly in the sci-fi genre, yet completely incompatible universes with entirely different tones.) It took the story from the individual struggle, the band of brothers (esp. in ME2), to the cosmically grand. While that fits with some sci-fi, Shepard's story in both previous games was that of the hero who can triumph against all odds (or die trying). All through ME2 people tell Shepard that the mission is a suicide mission. Yet, if you pay attention and get to know the strengths and weaknesses of your crew, you can make the right decisions and make it out alive.
Now, I knew going in to ME3 that the scale would be bigger, that Shepard would most likely have to make some noble sacrifice. I figured she'd probably die (I had some small hope for a high paragon, did every mission in the game, did some secret thing somewhere, do all that and maybe Shep lives option, but I didn't expect it). I knew that and accepted it, so long as it was worth it. I have no problem with the hero dying in the end.
Where the game lost me was the Catalyst. He tells Shepard the reason for the reapers' existence and what her choices are.
There's only one problem: the Catalyst is
wrong.
Shepard forged peace between the geth and the quarians. Shepard can befriend EDI and encourage her to grow and even romance an organic. Why can't Shepard argue this with the Catalyst? Shepard simply accepts what the Catalyst says, and in all three games Shepard has
never "simply accepted". The Catalyst brings a stark Calvinist view to a series that has always celebrated free will.
I didn't trust the Catalyst, and I couldn't figure out why Shepard
would. When he speaks of the reapers, he says "we", for cryin' out loud.
Then there's the choices:
- Kill the reapers, but also kill your friends and allies, EDI and the geth. Not to mention leave a pile of reaper corpses all over the place, which as we all know from ME2 is a Very Bad Thing.
- Control the reapers, but die in the process (how is that NOT a trap?).
- Or merge with the reapers and all other synthetic life. Hm... wasn't that Saren's fate in ME1? "I am a vision of the future, Shepard. The evolution of all organic life. This is our destiny. Join Sovereign and experience a true rebirth."
Synthesis is repellant. It is forcing your will upon bodies of every lifeform in the galaxy. It is accepting the reapers' "technological future" that Legion speaks of in ME2, the one the true geth rejected in favor of making their own future. One look at Joker's creepy Illusive Man eyes is enough to tell me that's the worst decision of the three.
Then, no matter which choice you make, Joker is shown fleeing from the color beam and then crashing on a garden planet with (at least in my case) the crew members who were on the ground with Shep in London. Heck, wasn't the entire squad on the ground? You could speak to each right before the final push. How did they get on the Normandy, and why on earth would Joker abandon the fight?
Not to mention the chunks of the Citadel falling to earth (if you didn't choose 'control') and likely plunging it into an ice age. Plus all the fleets stranded in human space, including quarians and turians who will likely starve. Plus Wrex stranded on earth, never to see his babies or bring the krogan into the future you worked so hard to get for them. And that's all hoping the relays don't destroy all life in their systems when they blow up, as the one in Arrival did. That'd just be doing the reapers job for them, only more efficiently.
The other option is that Shepard is hallucinating this whole ending as a last fever dream as she lies broken and dying at the feet of Harbinger (speaking of which, where
was Harbinger all this time? It had been
obsessed with Shepard all through ME2...). It certainly does have a dreamlike quality. But that's a copout ending (not to mention
insanely depressing).
Or maybe the indoctrination theory is true. I like that theory, and it fits. But... if it was, wouldn't the writers have made it more apparent? I mean, they're clearly good at their job, judging from how great the first 95% of the game was. Ambiguous endings in novels and movies are one thing (though it rarely works well in those mediums either). For a video game, I don't want to be told to go to the Imaginarium and dream up my own ending. It doesn't suit the genre.
Maybe life continues in the next cycle, free from the reapers. But tbh, that wasn't what
my Shepard was fighting for. She fought for
this cycle's right to survive and grow. This ending means all the characters and societies you've grown to love over the course of the games are gone. No more galactic society. Everything that made the universe so cool, just gone. It has ruined my desire to replay the games. I'd replayed ME1 and 2 many times over, and was looking forward to replaying ME3 many times over with my different Sheps and classes, trying for the best outcome.
Now I have no desire to replay when I know none of the decisions I make will have much impact on the ending at all. What's the point? Even with the highest assets, the galaxy is screwed. And it's no fun playing for so long just to be screwed.
Modifié par Paper Cake, 15 mars 2012 - 05:30 .