I don't think some people are supporting the "kid". I do think that they feel he's being truthful because they know what happens (when we've been saying that we're talking about what Shepard sees and not what the player ultimately knows) or they think you err on the side of just going along with the kid. Maybe not believing him, but not having a choice (well, you don't have any choice even with the 3 choices) or accepting what he says at face value because he hasn't been shown to want to hurt Shepard.
Ok, that last point makes me want to vomit. He is to be not trusted, but he is not to be not trusted because he isn't trying to kill a dying Shepard? So, we can now forget all the other attempst to kill Shepard and all the other people that are dying while the kid and Shepard are having a chat? Yes, we can because he's being nice to Shepard. Oh, and he really might mean well or maybe he's trying to do good things.
Ok, he's Mother Theresa with flamethrower Uzis the size of super huge skyscrapers, who isn't trying to kill someone who can help him (the very definition of an unselfish reason), but is killing thousands while he tries to get the dying person to help him. Yes, he's very not not trustable.
This is what people are really doing. They are not not trusting him based upon evidence he says is true. Contrary to this is the fact they fully did not not not trust TIM, who was under the kid's control and either got him to kill himself or shot him themselves. They also believe the reapers under the kid's control are evil maniacal killing machines and want to destroy them. So, it's far better to be the "kid" than to be someone or something under his control. Things under his control are evil and must be destroyed. On the other hand, he might be trying to do some good and so he must be not not trusted.
Modifié par 3DandBeyond, 06 juin 2012 - 01:46 .