This.2484Stryker wrote...
But I thought my Shepard reconciled the Geth and Quarians?
Because the advanced civilization would've crated new synthetics the next day?desert116 wrote...
Here's a question; why don't the Reapers just destroy the offending synthetics if they want to protect organic life, instead of, you know, destroying organic life.
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
"Plus, as that guy said above, if the reapers were created and just killed off every synthetic race that began, THAT would save species from "possible" synthetic attacks."
What if that AI was too sophisticated for the Reapers to destroy?
No, Shep said "maybe". And if you pick Destroy ending, then you're basically making a choice that you don't believe in technological singularity Reapers/Catalyst believe in.Darknessfalls23 wrote...
His logic isn't what bother me, it was Shepard accepting it.
They deemed humans as the strongest race of the cycle thus the representation of evolutionary peak of the cycle, I mean, wasn't it clear in ME2 already? Harbinger couldn't stop talking how humans' genetic code was great and how capable human were and how other races were inferiorDarknessfalls23 wrote...
Also what was the obsession with creating a human reaper over any other race.
suusuuu wrote...
I believe this depends on your playthrough, because in my game, he never said something even remotely similar to what you're claiming.Genera1Nemesis wrote...
Also, in ME3; when Legion is
uploading himself; he says that the death of the creators is the only solution;
and depending on Shep's interference that is what happens.
Might just go in and check but I'm sure I would notice if he said something like that.
Well they obviously destroy any existing AI anyway. Otherwise what happened to the AI of the Metacon War the protheans waged, and there must have been other AI in other cycles. Otherwise there would be no reason for the reapers to have even come into existence, according to the Star Child's reasons for them existing. Yet the only ones we encounter, or even mentioned in the present tense, other then the reapers are those that were created during the current cycle.Genera1Nemesis wrote...
"Plus, as that guy said above, if the reapers were created and just killed off every synthetic race that began, THAT would save species from "possible" synthetic attacks."
What if that AI was too sophisticated for the Reapers to destroy?
Modifié par AusitnDrake, 15 mars 2012 - 10:03 .
If you think so then just pick destroy ending. I mean, it's rather clear that's what this is forMesina2 wrote...
Sorry but Legion, EDI and Shepard resolving Geth-Quarian conflict with peace and alliance between both race, pretty much kills Catalyst's logic.
Darknessfalls23 wrote...
His logic isn't what bother me, it was Shepard accepting it. If you solved Geth and Quarian and talk to legion in the server where it proved that the Geth had and still have no wish to destroy organics , You should be able to prove the space baby wrong. Also what was the obsession with creating a human reaper over any other race. The whole ending seems like they saw the reboot of Battle star Galactica and wanted to copy the idea( since at least two of voice actors were chosen exclusively because of the show it doesn't surprise me). They should of stuck to the Dark energy Idea at least that sort of worked. Kind of like the plot of the Spin books by Robert Charles Wilson.
IsaacShep wrote...
If you think so then just pick destroy ending. I mean, it's rather clear that's what this is forMesina2 wrote...
Sorry but Legion, EDI and Shepard resolving Geth-Quarian conflict with peace and alliance between both race, pretty much kills Catalyst's logic.
aristaea wrote...
I don't really care about Star Child's logic. Why? Because:
1. Star Child is an AI.
2. AIs are created.
3. Someone created Star Child.
4. Star Child killed its creators.
This argument must be true, otherwise Star Child's logic is invalidated by its existence. This is proof of a homicidal AI that thinks it is right, not proof that is actually is right; we know that AI can be wrong, as evidenced by the geth heretics. Maybe Star Child's logic circuits are corrupt. Either way, time to blow up an AI core!
aristaea wrote...
I don't really care about Star Child's logic. Why? Because:
1. Star Child is an AI.
2. AIs are created.
3. Someone created Star Child.
4. Star Child killed its creators.
This argument must be true, otherwise Star Child's logic is invalidated by its existence. This is proof of a homicidal AI that thinks it is right, not proof that is actually is right; we know that AI can be wrong, as evidenced by the geth heretics. Maybe Star Child's logic circuits are corrupt. Either way, time to blow up an AI core!
But what about permantley?2484Stryker wrote...
But I thought my Shepard reconciled the Geth and Quarians?
desert116 wrote...
Here's a question; why don't the Reapers just destroy the offending synthetics if they want to protect organic life, instead of, you know, destroying organic life.
Modifié par ZacE7, 15 mars 2012 - 10:11 .
Iztiak wrote...
It's still absolutely terrible logic.
He's killing off entire species, as a synthetic, so that later on they aren't "possibly" killed by synthetics they create. It's obtuse and idiotic.
Because synthetics aren't always hostile... Honestly, in all situations BUT the reapers, they were friendly. The geth never acted as aggressors, and forgave the quarians and helped them back on the homeland as absolutely soon as the quarians stopped attacking.
Plus, as that guy said above, if the reapers were created and just killed off every synthetic race that began, THAT would save species from "possible" synthetic attacks.
Truly a terrible ending.
Retour en haut