Aller au contenu

Photo

[removed]


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
21 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Atomsk Rex Pirata

Atomsk Rex Pirata
  • Members
  • 62 messages
[post removed]

Modifié par Atomsk Rex Pirata, 18 novembre 2013 - 09:17 .


#2
legion999

legion999
  • Members
  • 5 315 messages
But then the Reapers would destroy them...

#3
GBGriffin

GBGriffin
  • Members
  • 2 259 messages
It's a lesson: Hard work never pays off. Just like in real life.


Wait, what? o_O

#4
clonedoriginzero

clonedoriginzero
  • Members
  • 618 messages
after suffering through that block of text.
it still doesnt make any sense?

#5
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages
Heh, another thought to add to the pile. But yeah, the more troops you unite and bring to Earth, the more you're stranding there forever.

#6
CRISIS1717

CRISIS1717
  • Members
  • 1 597 messages
Maximum survived? by the end of the game my galaxy map had near enough every single place as a Reaper occupied territory and I assume if you don't do side missions that is the same as well, wouldn't that signify those species lost the battle anyway?

#7
Atomsk Rex Pirata

Atomsk Rex Pirata
  • Members
  • 62 messages

clonedoriginzero wrote...

after suffering through that block of text.
it still doesnt make any sense?


Yes. Also that.

#8
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

CRISIS1717 wrote...

Maximum survived? by the end of the game my galaxy map had near enough every single place as a Reaper occupied territory and I assume if you don't do side missions that is the same as well, wouldn't that signify those species lost the battle anyway?


Newsflash: Earth is Reaper occupied territory too, and the game assumes there are enough survivors to make "take back Earth" still valid (then again we all know the ending invalidates that anyway).

#9
rma2110

rma2110
  • Members
  • 795 messages
I think an EMS of 3000 or so means that the Earth is not destroyed. I also doubt that the future of the ME universe is as bleak as we imagine, unless BioWare want the next Mass Effect game to post-apocalyptic.

#10
Atomsk Rex Pirata

Atomsk Rex Pirata
  • Members
  • 62 messages

CRISIS1717 wrote...

Maximum survived? by the end of the game my galaxy map had near enough every single place as a Reaper occupied territory and I assume if you don't do side missions that is the same as well, wouldn't that signify those species lost the battle anyway?


Given Anderson's multiple references to the Reapers "focusing on city centers" a Reaper showing up doesn't mean instant death for everyone. Plus, they would have been more effective defending their own systems without commiting forces to Shepard.

#11
SyxxByNyne

SyxxByNyne
  • Members
  • 49 messages
What are you assuming is the "best" ending?

#12
Stygian1

Stygian1
  • Members
  • 1 284 messages
.... but, I like green....red is icky....

#13
dsl08002

dsl08002
  • Members
  • 1 778 messages
In a certain point of view all the endings in me3 is a victory for
the reapers

#14
aimlessgun

aimlessgun
  • Members
  • 2 008 messages

Atomsk Rex Pirata wrote...
Yes, your decisions and building your fleet do matter...they make the ending WORSE.


Wow I didn't even think about this...this is a really good point :blink:

#15
ZacE7

ZacE7
  • Members
  • 42 messages
i dont understand your point

i had low a EMS so all of earth and my alliance troops were vaporized with the destroy choice

with a high EMS, earth survives the destroy choice as well as many of the alliance troops

with a very high EMS, Shepard survives the destroy option, and so do earth and alliance troops

Modifié par ZacE7, 15 mars 2012 - 10:39 .


#16
Baronesa

Baronesa
  • Members
  • 1 934 messages

ZacE7 wrote...

i dont understand your point

i had low EMS so all of earth and my alliance troops were vaporized with the destroy choice

with a high EMS, earth survives as well as many of the alliance troops

with a very high EMS, Shepard survives the destroy option



And MORE troops/ships get stranded on Earth... while they could be closer to their home planet, since the Reapers were destroyed Galaxy wide, they could return to their homeplanets and rebuoild there, instead of being trapped on  earth

Modifié par Baronesa, 15 mars 2012 - 10:41 .


#17
Atomsk Rex Pirata

Atomsk Rex Pirata
  • Members
  • 62 messages

ZacE7 wrote...

i dont understand your point

i had low a EMS so all of earth and my alliance troops were vaporized with the destroy choice

with a high EMS, earth survives the destroy choice as well as many of the alliance troops

with a very high EMS, Shepard survives the destroy option, and so do earth and alliance troops



A high enough EMS to ensure that the first option you mentioned doesn't occur, but low enough that you don't needlessly strand more people on Earth.

Understand also that tounge is firmly planted against cheek in this post.

#18
Atomsk Rex Pirata

Atomsk Rex Pirata
  • Members
  • 62 messages

SyxxByNyne wrote...

What are you assuming is the "best" ending?


This is the best setup for the ending. As for the ending itself, what's your favorite color? I like red.

#19
pharsti

pharsti
  • Members
  • 1 010 messages
Wait... then id have to suffer throu how many hours of that bland multiplayer >_>?

#20
Taleroth

Taleroth
  • Members
  • 9 136 messages
People are just staring at me. They think I've finally snapped. For the past couple of minutes I've just sat here with head in my hands laughing.

The moral of the story is that hard work dooms everyone.

#21
swinburnian

swinburnian
  • Members
  • 18 messages

ZacE7 wrote...

i dont understand your point

i had low a EMS so all of earth and my alliance troops were vaporized with the destroy choice

with a high EMS, earth survives the destroy choice as well as many of the alliance troops

with a very high EMS, Shepard survives the destroy option, and so do earth and alliance troops



The OP's point is: the more allied fleets you bring to Earth, the more allied fleets you have stranded if Earth survives, which means more people on a planet with limited ability to sutain life.  And that  not only means that more people will starve, but they'll all starve SOONER.

So if you want the MOST people to survive the endgame, bring as FEW people as possible to Earth.

Not sure how right OP is, but it's certainly an interesting perspective.

#22
Atomsk Rex Pirata

Atomsk Rex Pirata
  • Members
  • 62 messages

Not sure how right OP is, but it's certainly an interesting perspective.


I would prefer to be wrong on this.