Caelorummors wrote...
There are two things I will discuss here:
A) Reapers, synthetics of the first variety, are not the same as the second synthetics being stopped from killing organics.
1) Reapers are liquified organics deconstructed by nanobots, where the consciousness is kept intact.
2) The mind of the reaper is human, the body is synthetic.
3) If the geth were to kill us pre-resolved quarian conflict, it would be done with synthetic minded synthetic bodied beings which would eventually see us a threat and/or a parasite destroying the galaxy. There is a nonzero probability that organics will evolve to one day rise up against the synthetics, be it terrorists (Cerberus) or otherwise, and thus the only logical conclusion may be to kill all life.
4) The reapers, being organic minded synthetics,OMS, does not kill everyone they encounter. The harvesting process is used to uplift a species to immortality, by putting the minds of the masses into one synthetic body.
5) Reapers, being OMS, see killing us as saving all organic life in the future, and future ascensions to immortality, by destroying the present. They do not stop the SMS from killing US, rather, all organic life. It is not OMSynthetics killing organics so that SMSynthetics do not kill organics, it is OMSynthetics killing and uplifting some or the current organics so that organic life may continue instead of SMSynthetics wiping out all organic life.
6) Reapers do not kill sentient lifeforms, only Sapient lifeforms. This is due to the uplifting process requiring consciousness.
Given that the Quarian conflict can be resolved, many say the options are illogical. To this end we must consider:
1) The Quarian/Geth conflict is resolved by uploading the Reaper code.
2) This code does not exist in the first cycle, the first creation of the reapers, thus synthetics killing organics is still very much a real threat to the reapers.
3) Without the creation of the reapers, Geth could not be ascended to the point of "life" and trustworthiness.
4) The reaper code, as it is called, is made from the reapers collective consciousness which is made from the deconstruction of organics by nanobots and their reconstruction into one ship. (becoming the nation).
5) Thus the concept of Synthetic/Organic peace only comes about when one of the two is fused with the other.
I hope that is breif and coherent. Please discuss!
Sorry, I disagree. The synthetic/organic position of the catalyst remains nonsensical to me.
A) I can't recall any evidence that reapers retain the consience of the species that create them. The nascent human reaper certainly didn't seem to have any kinship to Shepard. The idea that organics are 'immortalized' in reaper form is something that the catalyst and reapers simply state, but neither we nor Shepard has any objective way of evaluating. Personally, I think that even if reapers did embody the consience of the species (and I think that Soverign had far fewer active programs than a species would be expected to have individuals) their 'ascendence' so twists the nature of the species that to say they are embodied rather than exterminated is a distinction without difference - everything that made the individuals of that species unique is destroyed.

The quarian geth conflict was ultimately resolved due to reaper code. However, this wasn't because the code made geth trustworthy - it's because it made them individually dangerous. Without that code, the quarians would have wiped the geth out; its dissemination to all geth is, in part, what allowed Shepard to get the quarians to back off and consider peace. Throughout the quarian/geth conflict, it was the organics that were aggressive and the synthetics that acted primarily in self defence. That conflict actually reprsents an inverse of the catalyst's theory.
Also, a salient point is that while we can theorycraft this, from the perspective of Shepard, all he/she is likely to think of is that he's just brokered peace between the most obvious organic/synthetic conflict, and that he has a trustworthy crewmate and friend AI. I can't accept that he somehow forgets or argues that away in order to accept the catalyst's theory and the three choices based upon it.
I find the argument as strong as ever, and the idea that Shepard would accept it frankly angers me.