https://twitter.com/#!/jessicamerizan
Modifié par MJF JD, 16 mars 2012 - 02:49 .
Modifié par MJF JD, 16 mars 2012 - 02:49 .
So when she says something I can read it hereMJF JD wrote...
then why are you in a spoilers forum?
https://twitter.com/#!/jessicamerizan
MJF JD wrote...
then why are you in a spoilers forum?
https://twitter.com/#!/jessicamerizan
Modifié par Aesieru, 16 mars 2012 - 03:13 .
MJF JD wrote...
then why are you in a spoilers forum?
https://twitter.com/#!/jessicamerizan
ToastPants wrote...
Someone with a public twitter account please tweet her that 90% is not an arbitrary number, it's based on polling a sample size of around 50,000 people.
Modifié par makenzieshepard, 16 mars 2012 - 03:16 .
comanche warior wrote...
All it sounds like is that she is giving people the run around why would I follow her?
KorPhaeron wrote...
MJF JD wrote...
then why are you in a spoilers forum?
https://twitter.com/#!/jessicamerizan
I don't for a moment think there are any other endings, this was a hallucination, etc. Bioware/EA is letting these speculations go on for two reasons. First, they are letting people vent. Secondly, they are weighing options.
Years ago, I worked for a PR damage control team and everything right now is going by the book. First, re-affirm and ignore (also known as doubling down), then try and define the detractors in the mainstream with things like "this is all a big mistunderstand", etc. while remaining civil in the hopes the detractors go rabid. Meanwhile go dark and use countermeasures through third part sources to prop up your position and brand the outcry as driven by hacks, haters or a minority trying to wear out the detractors on these outlets or "shock troops" while protecting the corporate core. Next, offer something distracting (notice SWTOR is free this upcoming weekend) known as the "faux olive branch"/ask the angry people to explain their concerns (without agreeing to commit to a compromise), buy more add time (definitely going on right now), and hope it dies down. If the pressure is still on, determine the economic viability of 1) ignoring the outcry and banking on the fickle nature of consumers to get over it or 2) determining if we can make money off of fixing it.
If it is any consolation, the decision whether or not there is a fix DLC, etc, won't be made by the writers so illusions to things they wanted to convey don't matter much atm (to wit: the leads comments yesterday). I suspect he's been called in and politely told by the PR guys to not do that again. This is now a corporate problem, not an artistic struggle with fans. Somewhere in the EA bunker, attorneys, PR guys, writers and brass are sharing numbers b/c in the end this will come down to hard currency.
As one who despises the endings, I'm hoping the suits tell the visionaries that the customers are loud enough and numerous enough to swollow their pride and get them out of this storm. For those that love them, I readily accept your position and respectfully disagree.
Why waste my time ?
KorPhaeron wrote...
I don't for a moment think there are any other endings, this was a hallucination, etc. Bioware/EA is letting these speculations go on for two reasons. First, they are letting people vent. Secondly, they are weighing options.
Years ago, I worked for a PR damage control team and everything right now is going by the book. First, re-affirm and ignore (also known as doubling down), then try and define the detractors in the mainstream with things like "this is all a big mistunderstand", etc. while remaining civil in the hopes the detractors go rabid. Meanwhile go dark and use countermeasures through third part sources to prop up your position and brand the outcry as driven by hacks, haters or a minority trying to wear out the detractors on these outlets or "shock troops" while protecting the corporate core. Next, offer something distracting (notice SWTOR is free this upcoming weekend) known as the "faux olive branch"/ask the angry people to explain their concerns (without agreeing to commit to a compromise), buy more add time (definitely going on right now), and hope it dies down. If the pressure is still on, determine the economic viability of 1) ignoring the outcry and banking on the fickle nature of consumers to get over it or 2) determining if we can make money off of fixing it.
If it is any consolation, the decision whether or not there is a fix DLC, etc, won't be made by the writers so illusions to things they wanted to convey don't matter much atm (to wit: the leads comments yesterday). I suspect he's been called in and politely told by the PR guys to not do that again. This is now a corporate problem, not an artistic struggle with fans. Somewhere in the EA bunker, attorneys, PR guys, writers and brass are sharing numbers b/c in the end this will come down to hard currency.
As one who despises the endings, I'm hoping the suits tell the visionaries that the customers are loud enough and numerous enough to swollow their pride and get them out of this storm. For those that love them, I readily accept your position and respectfully disagree.
Why waste my time ?
GOODKyle wrote...
@JessicaMerizan I think red is my fave. Why oh why do we have to sacrifice the Geth & EDI though
Actinguy1 wrote...
ToastPants wrote...
Someone with a public twitter account please tweet her that 90% is not an arbitrary number, it's based on polling a sample size of around 50,000 people.
I'm on the side of those enraged by the ending, but this is not a scientific poll. It's what's called a "self-selecting sample." It's a sample of the sort of person who goes onto a gaming website and votes on the ending. For a scientific sample, they would have to (for example) randomly call at least 1,000 people who bought ME3 and ask them about the ending. (1000 is a generally accepted sample size in the scientific community, provided that you truly are choosing participants randomly.)
Modifié par ToastPants, 16 mars 2012 - 03:20 .