157 réponses à ce sujet

[Foregone_Conclusion]

tenojitsu wrote...

I wish someone who likes the ending can tell me how one of my final squad mates ends up on the Normandy

 "That hasn't been revealed yet" - Bioware person on twitter

 DLC... in a month or so.. maybe sooner, I'd wager. 

[dynastyhan13]

I like the ending but dislike my squad mates so I couldn't tell you how they end up there, sorry!

perhaps someone who dislikes the ending but likes the squad mates could answer that question!

[AJRimmsey]

Vaktathi wrote...

AJRimmsey wrote...

Jagatay wrote...

So if i open a new thread calling people "child" who likes the ending or find the ending logical. Those people should not answer me?

I can see why you guys like the ending.

errm you do realise you need to proof read before posting,as i think half you retoric stays in your head and doesnt end up on the page.

you make no sense

Says the poster who avoids actually directly addressing arguments.

thats because you are just looking to start an arguement.

which also makes no sense,so i ignored you.

[Foregone_Conclusion]

Okay theory?

Assuming that some how our beloved hero/heroine can surivive a reaper blast, when ships, tanks and other armored infantry can't... oh wait... Answer? Ending never happened.

[thunderhawk862002]

AJRimmsey wrote...

thunderhawk862002 wrote...

AJRimmsey wrote...

thunderhawk862002 wrote...

Funny you don't dismiss my claims of false advertisement.  The product was advertised as having radically different endings which they weren't.  It was advertised as bringing closure to the franchise and not leaving questions unanswered when if fact it was being developed specifically to do that purpose.  He said there wouldn't be definitive A, B.C ending scenarios and there were.  The ending to the game was supposed to be based from your decisions through the previous three games and it wasn't.

false advertisment is just a reason to return a game.

if theres one thing games these days dont do is truthful advertising,if they did i wouldnt have mafia 2 and DA2 rotting in my cupboard.

so pardon me for ignoring that line of reasoning as game content is never written in stone until after release..

And if you didn't call them out on it you're just letting them get away with it.

not really,i did call them out...
yet those games are still rotting in the cupboard.

but i do now vet games before buying them.

which has saved me a fortune.

Through what channels?  If it's just on the message boards or e-mail of course you'd get blown off.   Now if you tried going to the FTC and the BBB that would be a different story.  If you did that with proper evidence and a good argument then the system failed.

[tenojitsu]

Foregone_Conclusion wrote...

tenojitsu wrote...

I wish someone who likes the ending can tell me how one of my final squad mates ends up on the Normandy

 "That hasn't been revealed yet" - Bioware person on twitter

 DLC... in a month or so.. maybe sooner, I'd wager. 

So a bioware person really said that? Sounds like an admission that there are holes there, perhaps purposely. Would love to just hear how they fill in the gaps. Ats good news

[Foregone_Conclusion]

I have not heard or seen ANY post from Bioware here yet saying that this wasn't exactly what they intended. If someone has, do show us.

Left us gaps and an obvious answer to the riddle already.

[tenojitsu]

dynastyhan13 wrote...

I like the ending but dislike my squad mates so I couldn't tell you how they end up there, sorry!

perhaps someone who dislikes the ending but likes the squad mates could answer that question!

What does disliking squad mates have to do with anything? If you're saying that I should be happy that my squad ate ended up there and not someplace worse, I am. Just wanna know how he/she got there

[Vaktathi]

AJRimmsey wrote...

Vaktathi wrote...

AJRimmsey wrote...

Jagatay wrote...

So if i open a new thread calling people "child" who likes the ending or find the ending logical. Those people should not answer me?

I can see why you guys like the ending.

errm you do realise you need to proof read before posting,as i think half you retoric stays in your head and doesnt end up on the page.

you make no sense

Says the poster who avoids actually directly addressing arguments.

thats because you are just looking to start an arguement.

which also makes no sense,so i ignored you.

*Argument* as in a discussion involving differing points of view; debate ; a process of reasoning; series of reasons



You know, a flow of reasoning back and forth?

You have been steadfastly avoiding actually directly addressing most of the points made and cherry picking things out or going completely elsewhere. 

One of my posts you quoted for example. You took one tiny little piece of a larger argument (again: as in a process of reasoning) and took it somewhere completely different, rather than actually addressing the point I was trying to make.

You're basically evading and redirecting, not actually addressing or discussing anything. 

You haven't had a logic/philosophy class ever have you?

And are you *really* going to tell me, with your OP post, that you weren't intending to start an argument, with name-calling and accusations being the primary content of that post?

Modifié par Vaktathi, 16 mars 2012 - 08:05 .

[CroGamer002]

Ziguehart wrote...

I am good with blue ending if this happen =D

i4.photobucket.com/albums/y133/aimlessgun/bestblue.jpg

You just made me love Control ending.

[Farbautisonn]

Vaktathi wrote...*Argument* as in a[color=rgb(51, 51, 51)"> ] [/color]involving[color=rgb(51, 51, 51)"> ] [/color]points[color=rgb(51, 51, 51)"> ] [/color]view;[color=rgb(51, 51, 51)"> ] [/color]process[color=rgb(51, 51, 51)"> ] [/color]reasoning;[color=rgb(51, 51, 51)"> ] [/color]of reasons



You know, a flow of reasoning back and forth?

You have been steadfastly avoiding actually directly addressing most of the points made and cherry picking things out or going completely elsewhere. 

One of my posts you quoted for example. You took one tiny little piece of a larger argument (again: as in a process of reasoning) and took it somewhere completely different, rather than actually addressing the point I was trying to make.

You're basically evading and redirecting, not actually addressing or discussing anything. 

You haven't had a logic/philosophy class ever have you?

And are you *really* going to tell me, with your OP post, that you weren't intending to start an argument, with name-calling and accusations being the primary content of that post?

*Golfclap* 

Bravo.

[AJRimmsey]

Vaktathi wrote...


And are you *really* going to tell me, with your OP post, that you weren't intending to start an argument, with name-calling and accusations being the primary content of that post?

ok.i`ll give you this one chance,and one chance only.

who did i call a name or accuse of something ?


remember,get this wrong or try arguing again and i`ll just add you to ignore as a troll.
i cannot say fairer than that.

[StabGuy]

I knew what he was going to say without even opening the thread.

It's a form of natural selection me thinks.

Majority think ( A ), the logical conclusions, discovered with hive mind mentality of trail and error.
Minority think ( B ) , internal mechanisms strive to find purpose/acknowledgement to extreme levels due to obsessive subconscious self-reflection over their rank in the human pack. Taking stance ( B ) is a way to bypass norms to create an alpha stance on an idea which has already been proven - unfounded - but they continue down this path of doom and destruction anyway.

Let’s say we move this into real world scenario. End of the world 'food menu'.

Majority eat ( A ) tastes good, is known to be healthy.
Minority eat ( B ) polar The Majority opinion deliberately, eat food that tastes bland, potentially a carcinogen.

Everyone who sided with The Minority, acted out different for the sake of 'being' different and all died of cancer. While the majority lived on, until a new minority splintered off and the cycle is infinitely repeated until the human race became extinct.

[Ex-Cerberus]

and if i wasnt stoned when i registered ME2 you wouldnt even see that on this account.

How ironic. A drug-addict is talking down to people. 

Maybe you just enjoyed the ending because... you were... on drugs? 

[Farbautisonn]

AJRimmsey wrote...

disgusted with the so called fans who moaned.

-Overgeneralisations and at the very least an implied ad hominem. Derogative commenting and steriotyping. Not inflammatory at all, noeh...

a game of this quality gets ragged on by internet children ?,
makes me sick to my stomach..

-Gee wiz. Your definition of "quality" isnt at all subjective nor is the very term "quality" subjective. And "internet children"? See the above.

.well bollox to them,ungrateful spoiled children,give them nothing more as they deserve nothing.

-Inflammatory, derogative, typecasting, condescending, patronising etc

this "endings" fracas is nothing more than a reaction to a great series ending by paedantic people with nothing in thier lives better to focus on.

-Do I really need to keep going? 

Modifié par Farbautisonn, 16 mars 2012 - 08:23 .

[AJRimmsey]

Ex-Cerberus wrote...

and if i wasnt stoned when i registered ME2 you wouldnt even see that on this account.

How ironic. A drug-addict is talking down to people. 

Maybe you just enjoyed the ending because... you were... on drugs? 

so because you mistook stoned [which in my culture means drunk] you call me a drug addict ?

now THATS ironic

[Vaktathi]

AJRimmsey wrote...

ok.i`ll give you this one chance,and one chance only.

who did i call a name or accuse of something ?


remember,get this wrong or try arguing again and i`ll just add you to ignore as a troll.
i cannot say fairer than that.

Umm...

a game of this quality gets ragged on by internet children  

this "endings" fracas is nothing more than a reaction to a great series ending by paedantic people with nothing in thier lives better to focus on. 

You see no name calling/accusations in there at all?

I see several. You're calling anyone who doesn't like the endings those things. sounds like name calling to me. 

Modifié par Vaktathi, 16 mars 2012 - 08:48 .

[Farbautisonn]

AJRimmsey wrote...

so because you mistook stoned [which in my culture means drunk] you call me a drug addict ?

now THATS ironic

-So not only is he childish and stupid he also has to be omniscient and know the intricacies of your cultural application of certain nouns and verbs in slang? Really? 


Do you know what Ironic means?

Modifié par Farbautisonn, 16 mars 2012 - 08:29 .

[RHINOK 9]

AJRimmsey wrote...

Ex-Cerberus wrote...

and if i wasnt stoned when i registered ME2 you wouldnt even see that on this account.

How ironic. A drug-addict is talking down to people. 

Maybe you just enjoyed the ending because... you were... on drugs? 

so because you mistook stoned [which in my culture means drunk] you call me a drug addict ?

now THATS ironic

alcoholic? Anyway, this thread is going nowhere fast. Majority rules. Case closed

[kamikazekeeg]

I think some people are taking abit too far, but the endings are still pretty bogus. I'm not even against the actual choices myself, the endings for them were just rushed and confusing. No one can say other wise, it's pretty damn obvious.

[tufy1]

Dear OP: sadly, you posted in "no spoilers" area, so we'll have to do this by touch.

What I would like to ask you is the following: Can you honestly and without any reservations claim that Mass Effect 3 with current ending is better than the game would be, had it ended approximately 10 minutes earlier after the pre-elevator scene?

The ending isn't that bad if you take it out of context and watch it as is (other than some things not making sense), but turns into a disaster if you look at it from the perspective of the game. For more detailed analysis, we'll have to move this into the spoiler section.

[goten11756]

Guys, stop feeding the troll. He obviously has a God complex, and he is unable to reason since hes backed into a corner. This thread needs to be closed...

[Tazzmission]

AJRimmsey wrote...

disgusted with the so called fans who moaned.

a game of this quality gets ragged on by internet children ?,
makes me sick to my stomach..

@Bioware...thanks,quite a ride.
make no more,because if this so called "furor" is the reward for all this work..well bollox to them,ungrateful spoiled children,give them nothing more as they deserve nothing.

@Children..,<deleted> you dont even deserve comment.


this "endings" fracas is nothing more than a reaction to a great series ending by paedantic people with nothing in thier lives better to focus on.

+1 seriously im glad we see eye to eye that people are over reacting to the endings

[TUHD]

Reported topic and topic creator for flaming, hating and trying to incite a flame war. Won't further return to this thread.
TUHD - avoids further feeding the troll

[Doctor Uburian]

AJRimmsey wrote...

disgusted with the so called fans who moaned.

a game of this quality gets ragged on by internet children ?,
makes me sick to my stomach..

@Bioware...thanks,quite a ride.
make no more,because if this so called "furor" is the reward for all this work..well bollox to them,ungrateful spoiled children,give them nothing more as they deserve nothing.

@Children..,<deleted> you dont even deserve comment.


this "endings" fracas is nothing more than a reaction to a great series ending by paedantic people with nothing in thier lives better to focus on.

First of all, be more polite. Lots of people can take your comment as an offense.

On this forum, anyone can express his personal opinion about the endings, but you must respect the others opinions too.

And here, nearly no one is saying that the game in self is bad, the game is amazing, Bioware has done an amazing work. The real problem is that the endings are out of place.

As a customer that has expended hundreds of euros on a product, i can expect the product i paid for, can't i?