saracen16 wrote...
Wow, you didn't even read my post, did you? Re-read it again. Your choices do matter.
Modifié par 2Shepards, 16 mars 2012 - 11:04 .
Changing where the ending starts does not change the fact that the last 20 minutes or so of the game were poorly executed.Genera1Nemesis wrote...
The entire game was the end of the story, not just the last 5 minutes.
Total Biscuit wrote...
Why does this tiny, TINY minority of people keep making so many threads saying the exact same thing, as if they're vastly unpopular opinion is fact?
Why not just post in one of the other 2 percenters threads if your just going to trot out the same irrelevant arguments? I suppose it makes it look like there are more of them maybe? or just that the endings only appeal to people who don't really think things through or work logically, since that describes the endings too.
It's just so annoying to get this vocal little minority filling half the forum wih the same nonesense.
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
The entire game was the end of the story, not just the last 5 minutes.
Uezurii wrote...
Changing where the ending starts does not change the fact that the last 20 minutes or so of the game were poorly executed.Genera1Nemesis wrote...
The entire game was the end of the story, not just the last 5 minutes.
This, while during the game and right before Harbinger hits you, your choices do indeed matter. But then when you get up from Harbingers blast none of those choices mattered, because whatever you chose, you get the same sequence, and the same 3 cut scenes with slight changes like the different colours, or the soldiers dying, or cheering. And that isn't even based on your choices, but your EMS.2Shepards wrote...
saracen16 wrote...
Wow, you didn't even read my post, did you? Re-read it again. Your choices do matter.
No, no they don't, since the 3 choices given in the end are so invalid, so disconnected, so utterly freaking outta the blue, they have nothing to do with the choices and work you put into me1, me2, and certainly bare no meaning on all the stupid running around (and it indeed feels stupid to me now) you had to do to unite the galaxy in 3.
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
Total Biscuit wrote...
Why does this tiny, TINY minority of people keep making so many threads saying the exact same thing, as if they're vastly unpopular opinion is fact?
Why not just post in one of the other 2 percenters threads if your just going to trot out the same irrelevant arguments? I suppose it makes it look like there are more of them maybe? or just that the endings only appeal to people who don't really think things through or work logically, since that describes the endings too.
It's just so annoying to get this vocal little minority filling half the forum wih the same nonesense.
Wow; please read your own post again in Hitler sounding voice. So in your opinion a 'vocal little minority' doesn't have the sames rights as what you percieve to be the 'vocal large minority?" What if those who saw the positives in this game, who are satisfied that Shep's story is over and we got the conclusion to all plots and sub-plots: did not all feel the need to post in the forums because they have no desire to **** about the last 3 minutes of a fantastic game?
Ibecomedeath wrote...
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
The entire game was the end of the story, not just the last 5 minutes.
And the final 5 minutes of 1 game, invalidated the whole 3 games... You don't see that as an issue?
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
Uezurii wrote...
Changing where the ending starts does not change the fact that the last 20 minutes or so of the game were poorly executed.Genera1Nemesis wrote...
The entire game was the end of the story, not just the last 5 minutes.
20 minutes? I'm assuming you're talking about when you meet Catalyst? That was only like 5 minutes of dialogue, and then a 3 minute cutscene. And that still doens't mean that Mass Effect 3 as a WHOLE was not the end of the story. Throughout the game we were given resolution to every MAJOR and MINOR conflict that arose for out character since ME1. Just because you didn't like the Catalyst part or the three last choices in the end does not mean that your choices NEVER counted.
How many choices were you given at the end (last five minutes) of Mass Effect 2?
2Shepards wrote...
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
Total Biscuit wrote...
Why does this tiny, TINY minority of people keep making so many threads saying the exact same thing, as if they're vastly unpopular opinion is fact?
Why not just post in one of the other 2 percenters threads if your just going to trot out the same irrelevant arguments? I suppose it makes it look like there are more of them maybe? or just that the endings only appeal to people who don't really think things through or work logically, since that describes the endings too.
It's just so annoying to get this vocal little minority filling half the forum wih the same nonesense.
Wow; please read your own post again in Hitler sounding voice. So in your opinion a 'vocal little minority' doesn't have the sames rights as what you percieve to be the 'vocal large minority?" What if those who saw the positives in this game, who are satisfied that Shep's story is over and we got the conclusion to all plots and sub-plots: did not all feel the need to post in the forums because they have no desire to **** about the last 3 minutes of a fantastic game?
Usually because completeing something leaves you with a sense of accomplishment and pride.
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
The entire game was the end of the story, not just the last 5 minutes.
Also, some artists like their work to be liked, which seems to be incomprehsible to these 'Keep your "integrity" no matter what, Bioware' people.Gruzmog wrote...
saracen16 wrote...
Fine. Go for it. Boycott the company, but don't think for one second that BioWare should listen to you.
As Forbes stated, if enough people hate the game for it, and it seems they do, they should change it because it is in their own best interest to have satisfied costumers.
SeanThen1 wrote...
The gif posted above is pretty dead on, actually. Mass Effect 3 had an A, B, C ending and we were told that it would not.
I'm personally of the opinion that the current endings should not be invalidated. Instead, what is already there can be expanded upon by offering more options which would be better supported by additions to the game. Shepard has to realize that the destruction of the Mass Relays is the destruction of the Galactic Community. Whatever the starchild is, he wouldn't just roll over and take that were he given the chance.
What if the Crucible could be used to damage the Reapers in the immediate area, the bulk of their forces?
However, it doing so does NOT destroy the Relays. He must then place his trust in the remainder of his War Assets to fight and win against the remainder of Reaper threat throughout the galaxy. Shepard could choose to fight and win against these creatures on his own terms, not by what the enemy simply places in front of him.
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
Ibecomedeath wrote...
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
The entire game was the end of the story, not just the last 5 minutes.
And the final 5 minutes of 1 game, invalidated the whole 3 games... You don't see that as an issue?
Unless they have a clear vision of where they want Mass Effect 4 to be? All the 'doom and gloom' of assuming that it was all the worst possible outcomes is just that; assumptions. They said the ME universe isn't done yet, just Shep's story within it. So now you want to tell them where the next game should begin too?
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
Uezurii wrote...
Changing where the ending starts does not change the fact that the last 20 minutes or so of the game were poorly executed.Genera1Nemesis wrote...
The entire game was the end of the story, not just the last 5 minutes.
20 minutes? I'm assuming you're talking about when you meet Catalyst? That was only like 5 minutes of dialogue, and then a 3 minute cutscene. And that still doens't mean that Mass Effect 3 as a WHOLE was not the end of the story. Throughout the game we were given resolution to every MAJOR and MINOR conflict that arose for out character since ME1. Just because you didn't like the Catalyst part or the three last choices in the end does not mean that your choices NEVER counted.
How many choices were you given at the end (last five minutes) of Mass Effect 2?
I am actually talking about the point from Shepard recovering from the blast, while not as poorly done as the Catalyst, it was still off. After all, this is where the plot holes start.Genera1Nemesis wrote...
Uezurii wrote...
Changing where the ending starts does not change the fact that the last 20 minutes or so of the game were poorly executed.Genera1Nemesis wrote...
The entire game was the end of the story, not just the last 5 minutes.
20 minutes? I'm assuming you're talking about when you meet Catalyst? That was only like 5 minutes of dialogue, and then a 3 minute cutscene. And that still doens't mean that Mass Effect 3 as a WHOLE was not the end of the story. Throughout the game we were given resolution to every MAJOR and MINOR conflict that arose for out character since ME1. Just because you didn't like the Catalyst part or the three last choices in the end does not mean that your choices NEVER counted.
How many choices were you given at the end (last five minutes) of Mass Effect 2?
Modifié par Uezurii, 16 mars 2012 - 11:19 .
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
2Shepards wrote...
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
Total Biscuit wrote...
Why does this tiny, TINY minority of people keep making so many threads saying the exact same thing, as if they're vastly unpopular opinion is fact?
Why not just post in one of the other 2 percenters threads if your just going to trot out the same irrelevant arguments? I suppose it makes it look like there are more of them maybe? or just that the endings only appeal to people who don't really think things through or work logically, since that describes the endings too.
It's just so annoying to get this vocal little minority filling half the forum wih the same nonesense.
Wow; please read your own post again in Hitler sounding voice. So in your opinion a 'vocal little minority' doesn't have the sames rights as what you percieve to be the 'vocal large minority?" What if those who saw the positives in this game, who are satisfied that Shep's story is over and we got the conclusion to all plots and sub-plots: did not all feel the need to post in the forums because they have no desire to **** about the last 3 minutes of a fantastic game?
Usually because completeing something leaves you with a sense of accomplishment and pride.
Reapers gone, galaxy can now set it's own rules on how to develop instead of using reaper tech to build everything. How is this bad?
Allen Spellwaver wrote...
Who know the telephone number of CH? I gonna talk with him on and on until he change his mind.
Asnine112 wrote...
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
Uezurii wrote...
Changing where the ending starts does not change the fact that the last 20 minutes or so of the game were poorly executed.Genera1Nemesis wrote...
The entire game was the end of the story, not just the last 5 minutes.
20 minutes? I'm assuming you're talking about when you meet Catalyst? That was only like 5 minutes of dialogue, and then a 3 minute cutscene. And that still doens't mean that Mass Effect 3 as a WHOLE was not the end of the story. Throughout the game we were given resolution to every MAJOR and MINOR conflict that arose for out character since ME1. Just because you didn't like the Catalyst part or the three last choices in the end does not mean that your choices NEVER counted.
How many choices were you given at the end (last five minutes) of Mass Effect 2?
Funny you mention this.
You know what the difference is?
The choice was framed within the context of what had happened earlier in the game. I'm pretty sure that if the 2 choices that came after the suicide run in ME2 were completely disassociated with the rest of the game people would've raged at ME2 as well.
And funnily enough, this Saracen personality , as always, continues to ignore the more well presented arguments against the ending. Master baiter if I ever saw one.
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
Asnine112 wrote...
Genera1Nemesis wrote...
Uezurii wrote...
Changing where the ending starts does not change the fact that the last 20 minutes or so of the game were poorly executed.Genera1Nemesis wrote...
The entire game was the end of the story, not just the last 5 minutes.
20 minutes? I'm assuming you're talking about when you meet Catalyst? That was only like 5 minutes of dialogue, and then a 3 minute cutscene. And that still doens't mean that Mass Effect 3 as a WHOLE was not the end of the story. Throughout the game we were given resolution to every MAJOR and MINOR conflict that arose for out character since ME1. Just because you didn't like the Catalyst part or the three last choices in the end does not mean that your choices NEVER counted.
How many choices were you given at the end (last five minutes) of Mass Effect 2?
Funny you mention this.
You know what the difference is?
The choice was framed within the context of what had happened earlier in the game. I'm pretty sure that if the 2 choices that came after the suicide run in ME2 were completely disassociated with the rest of the game people would've raged at ME2 as well.
And funnily enough, this Saracen personality , as always, continues to ignore the more well presented arguments against the ending. Master baiter if I ever saw one.
ME3 story is about stopping Reapers.
ME3 ending saw the Reapers stopped. Did I miss something?
Retour en haut