pdHades wrote...
Well, if Indoc is wrong, it does't change the fact that the writers left plot holes galore, and tried to be artys for arts sake at the cost of an entire franchise.
To actually trick players with the indoctrination?Makatak wrote...
Why stop at just the ending of ME3?
Modifié par shurryy, 16 mars 2012 - 06:35 .
Lethys1 wrote...
Anyone who so emphatically rejects it and claims there's no legitimate backing just lacks an understanding of the theory. It's fine, no one can prove it's correct or false, but it certainly makes sense and has proof behind it.
Modifié par MintyCool, 16 mars 2012 - 06:41 .
Noatz wrote...
Indoctrination theory is far from crackpot. It actually makes a lot of sense given the evidence we see in the game.
That said, I still don't believe it.
kw0lf wrote...
They are the third stage of grief ... bargaining. I'm still in stage two. You are obviously at stage five ... kudos to you sir. I hope to get there soon.
http://en.wikipedia....bler-Ross_model
Modifié par Smiley556, 16 mars 2012 - 06:42 .
MintyCool wrote...
Lethys1 wrote...
Anyone who so emphatically rejects it and claims there's no legitimate backing just lacks an understanding of the theory. It's fine, no one can prove it's correct or false, but it certainly makes sense and has proof behind it.
Truthers 9/11, Holocaust Deniers, etc.
With your logic the above organizations are legit. Don't try to flock your feathers with your intellectual superiority unless you have an understanding with wtf you're talking about.
Speak more multi-syllable words in a random order; I enjoy it puppet.
Checkmate.
TheScott1987 wrote...
Indoctrination has, at least, been established ME canon and has been mentioned several times. That makes it better than a Star Child that magically popped up at the end without any mentioning of it before. Sadly, there is more evidence it's indoctrination than there is that a Space Child controls the Reapers.
Established canon > new nonsensical stuff
Modifié par Count Viceroy, 16 mars 2012 - 06:42 .
pdHades wrote...
Well, if Indoc is wrong, it does't change the fact that the writers left plot holes galore, and tried to be artsy for arts sake at the cost of an entire franchise.
Makatak wrote...
Noatz wrote...
Indoctrination theory is far from crackpot. It actually makes a lot of sense given the evidence we see in the game.
That said, I still don't believe it.
My point is, you can find "evidence" that suggests anything if you look hard enough. If I designed a graph that had "TV sales by unit" and "global warming", I could theorize that the invention of the TV is what's causing global warming. Look, evidence supports it -- both have gone up significantly since 1960!
Just because people are forming their own conclusions and suddenly stopping at the first idea that pops in their head because it's supported by the illusion of evidence doesn't mean that it's canon. As you can see, there's evidence out there that suggests that Shepard was Indoctrinated from the first moment he met Sovereign on Eden Prime, supported by the idea of how Indoctrination even works. It's feasibly possible if you fill in blanks with headcanon. Does that mean it's right? Absolutely not.
Much the same with the current popular "Indoctrination theory." Is it feasibly possible? Yes. But again, did the invention of the TV cause global warming?
Just because "evidence suggests" something when you look at it from a certain angle doesn't mean that the facts are there. Troll I may be, but ignore not the message by the look of the messenger's horse.kw0lf wrote...
They are the third stage of grief ... bargaining. I'm still in stage two. You are obviously at stage five ... kudos to you sir. I hope to get there soon.
http://en.wikipedia....bler-Ross_model
I'm well in to stage 5. You should join me. The water is nice.
PlumPaul82393 wrote...
They're too invested with the ridiculous theory to actually face reality. There was no deeper meaning in the ending.
Retour en haut