10 réponses à ce sujet

[psychologicall]

intel pentium dual cpu t3200 2.00ghz 200ghz graphic card ati radeon 2400 hd runs and 320 hard drive? actualy it runs but verry bad sometimes.. theres is a way i can run the game better?? sorry the bad ingles

[Gorath Alpha]

No chance without major expenditure. That CPU is at the minimum, and unless you can overclock it, is just plain slow (being able to overclock a CPU is normally limited by the contents of the Setup in the BIOS, and ordinary brand named PCs seldom have that option). The video card is below the minimum, and needs to be replaced with an n600 Mainline gaming card.

Gorath
-

Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 14 juin 2010 - 07:06 .

[psychologicall]

thx for the answear but i did not get the part "that cpu is at the minimum"?or do yo mean is the minimum i can put it at the maximum? and what is overclock? the video card i know is below the minimum i just have to changit.i am a litlle bit newbe in this matter...

[Gorath Alpha]

The Pentium Dual is a gutted out processor.  Most of the cache RAM that a Core normally has was removed, so it could be cheaper.  Many of them are sold with default core speeds too slow for this game.  The one you have is what is, in my opinion, the game's minimum.  It is doubtful if your PC has an overclocking option in Setup.  Whether you can replace the CPU  with a  faster one is something I can't know without taking the PC apart and reading the manual for the motherboard. 

One quality from the original Core parent design survived.  If the system setup (in the BIOS) allows for resetting the core speed, the Pentium Dual responds better at higher speeds (that's what overclocking is, but very few PCs from brand named makers have that option). 

Gorath
-

Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 14 juin 2010 - 07:08 .

[psychologicall]

thx man

[rumbur86]

CPU is one part, but most work is done by yours graphic card. You can have a dual core, just change your radeon for new one, or you can tweak it, you know, overcloaking and all. ATI got nice tool for it.

[Gorath Alpha]

rumbur86 wrote...

CPU is one part, but most work is done by yours graphic card. You can have a dual core, just change your radeon for new one, or you can tweak it, you know, overcloaking and all. ATI got nice tool for it.

When both major components are at, or under, the minimum, each in its own turn is ready to bottleneck the other if both aren't dealt with.  Yes, a medium level card will help some, and could be overclocked (low level cards don't take to an overclock at all well), if the CPU didn't also need overclocking, and probably cannot be, with a stock BIOS. 

IMO, the first thing to deal with is finding out the mainboard identificartion, and whether it will accept a better CPU.  The "Pentium Dual" isn't the same as a P4-D.  It started out as a C2D design, which is why is accepts overclocks readily.  But in exactly the way that Intel creates its Celerons, most of the cache RAM is taken out.  That makes them into a Celeron Dual, truth be told. 

Ideally, there is a C2D of some sort that will replace the current CPU. 

Gorath
-

[psychologicall]

how do i see my motherboard whitout have to open my pc

[Gorath Alpha]

Hello, again! 

There are several "inventory" programs that will examine your system and report back to you in detail.  Evergreen Home is one of the easiest to find, or AIDA32, its progenitor.  Almost any freeware / shareware library can make it available to you.  You install it, run it, and examine the report.  It will give you the model number and producer name for your mainboard. 

Gorath
-

[Gorath Alpha]

Gorath Alpha wrote...

That CPU is at the minimum, and unless you can overclock it, is just plain slow. The video card is well below the minimum, and needs to be replaced with an n600 Mainline gaming card.  There is also the GT 240 now.  nVIDIA popularized the numeric naming convention that identifies the various classes of graphics cards, and has now gone away from it. 
-

Compared to the practical minimum Radeon (for Medium textures), the 2400 has well below HALF of the performance:

www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php

For small textures, which the 2400 would handle somewhat better, here it is next to the Practical Minimum Xn00 generation Radeon:

www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php

It has only about 30% of the performance of that Radeon! 

The old HD 2400 was in the last Radeon generation using the added suffixes of "Pro", "XT", and "XT-Platinum".  It was very slow when it was brand new, but that was over four years ago.  In PC Gaming  terms, that is an eternity. 

Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 13 juin 2010 - 10:53 .

[Gorath Alpha]

Gorath Alpha wrote...

Compared to the practical minimum Radeon (for Medium textures), the 2400 has well below HALF of the performance:

www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php

One of the new arrivals yesterday wouldn't click on a LINK.  This was a side by side comparison chart, showing the various performance measurements. 

For small textures, which the 2400 would handle somewhat better, here it is next to the Practical Minimum Xn00 generation Radeon:

www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php

It has only about 30% of the performance of that Radeon!   This was another side by side comparison chart, similar to the first
one.

The old HD 2400 was in the last Radeon generation using the added suffixes of "Pro", "XT", and "XT-Platinum".  It was very slow when it was brand new, but that was over four years ago.  In PC Gaming  terms, that is an eternity. 

FYI, the suffixes trailed the code names that the graphics cards carried.  From least to most, they were in this sequence:  SE < GT < Vanilla < Pro < XT < XTP.  Vanilla means that there was no suffix in the name.  nVIDIA suffixes were different, and much more variable. 

Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 31 janvier 2011 - 05:00 .