[quote]Fallenfromthesky wrote...
[quote]Panicomatic wrote...
[quote]Zhijn wrote...
[quote]Panicomatic wrote...
No matter how long I think about it I just can't wrap my head around how they sent ME3 out the door thinking that the ending to the game is production worthy. All of this could have been avoided if they had spent more time developing the ending. I wonder how adversely the ending really is affecting their return on investment? I guess there is a silver lining though; Child's play donations are at about $64K right now.[/quote]
EA's march fiscal. Thats why. Out of time.
Deadlines. =(
[/quote]
You're right, as depressing as that is. Now the situation is so much more... complicated.
[/quote]
Ultimately everything boils down to profit. Massive demand for product but companies have no profit from product, product won't be supplied the law of supply and demand
What we need to do is to make our protest aims commercially viable or convince EA that fixing Mass Effect 3 is something they can profit from.
I know some people won't like that but there not really any other option if they don't think changing the ending is profitable they simply won't do it regardless of what we say.
[/quote]
People have been defending the ending saying that it's art. If the paintbrush was forced to paint an incomplete picture by the company, is the art still considered art? If the relationship between the art and the medium is effected by the investor, then isn't the art transformed into a product? As a consumer of that product are we not entitled to receive the product that was marketed and advertised to us?
Now don't get me wrong, this game is defintiely art. It has some very beautiful and gripping scenes, and I was enthralled. But under the logic used in this quote:
[quote]Panicomatic wrote...
No matter how long I think about it I just can't wrap my head around how they sent ME3 out the door thinking that the ending to the game is production worthy. All of this could have been avoided if they had spent more time developing the ending. I wonder how adversely the ending really is affecting their return on investment? I guess there is a silver lining though; Child's play donations are at about $64K right now.[/quote]
EA's march fiscal. Thats why. Out of time.
Deadlines. =(
[/quote]
would that not constitute that the art was manipulated by external sources prior to its creation? What is it that we are doing now? We're trying to manipulate the art after its creation, to extend and build upon what is already there. So as a point of being an art piece, does the boundary of acceptable change assert itself based on a timline? Is it still not the same thing to change art, regardless if the change happens prior to or after its creation? And if so how does being a consumer of a product fit into this equation -- because if the artist is censored by an investor and time constraints and profit projections does it not make the game more of a product then an artists creation? Which has more weight, and why?
Modifié par Panicomatic, 18 mars 2012 - 09:20 .